• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
brinsky

DX11
DX11 SwapChain present slow

5 posts in this topic

Hi!

I've exhausted every other way to solve the problem, so here I am. Hopefully somebody can point me in the right direction.

I'm building a deferred lighting engine on D3D11, C++. Rendering is done as follows:

- MRT (albedo, normal, depth)

- Light geometry

- G-Buffer

- Post-processing

 

These phases are fast and they're working rather well. The problem is at swap chain present call (no vsync). It takes forever. What's weird about it is that however complex the scene is, the present function takes a couple of times the time needed for all the rendering phases combined. To put things into perspective, here's an example (timings):

MRT: 2.35445 ms
Lights: 3.19276 ms
G-buffer: 0.0114392 ms
Post-processing: 0.00946387 ms
Full loop without swap chain present: 5.87718 ms
Swap chain present call: 25.6921 ms

-----

Full: 32.1059 ms
 

As you can see, that's far beyond unacceptable. My first attempt at it was to simplify all the pixel shaders to the point where they returned a fixed color value. Although the rendering phases timings drop dramaticaly, even below 0.01 ms combined, the present call takes up to 5ms. I had to strike out PS bottleneck, my next attempt was to change target formats to something simple like DXGI_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8_UNORM. To no avail. So now I'm just shooting in the dark trying this and that without the required knowledge how to approach a specific problem like that. I have never worked in depth with gpu profilers (other than PIX - saddly deprecated) therefore I have no idea how to splice open a present process and have a look at what's going on in there. Actually I'm puzzled this scenario is possible at all. Any insight is on swap chain and it's present method is appreciated. I'm working with both AMD and Nvidia graphic cards, so any official profiler help is most welcome. Also, I have the most recent drivers installed.

I doubt the above info is sufficient, I'll post what you need as we go.

 

Thank you in advance,

b

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, kauna. That makes a lot of sense. Meaning I do have a bottleneck either at the shader stage or at some other GPU command execution. Which leaves me with GPU profiling.  I will report about the culprit once I find it.

Thanks again!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A possible cause here is a mis-sized backbuffer, i.e. where your backbuffer size isn't the same as your window's client rect.  Calling GetClientRect on your window, then comparing with the backbuffer size will very quickly tell you if that's what you've got.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A possible cause here is a mis-sized backbuffer, i.e. where your backbuffer size isn't the same as your window's client rect.  Calling GetClientRect on your window, then comparing with the backbuffer size will very quickly tell you if that's what you've got.

Thank you for your input, mhagain. Just to be sure on that, before creating window I call WINAPI AdjustWindowRect, also I do not permit resizing the window at this stage, therefore the backbuffer size is safe.

 

 

essentially the driver won't let the CPU get more than N frames ahead of the GPU. So if the CPU is just spitting out lots of commands the GPU is taking a long time to execute them, the driver will start to block the CPU in Present once N frames have been buffered.

MJP, thank you. That makes even further sense. There has to be some synchronicity between CPU and GPU at some level. I'll dig into profilers.

 

Thank you everybody for your insight, I appreciate it. I have a good lead now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By lonewolff
      Hi Guys,
      I am just wondering if it is possible to acquire the address of the backbuffer if an API (based on DX11) only exposes the 'device' and 'context' pointers?
      Any advice would be greatly appreciated
    • By MarcusAseth
      bool InitDirect3D::Init() { if (!D3DApp::Init()) { return false; } //Additional Initialization //Disable Alt+Enter Fullscreen Toggle shortkey IDXGIFactory* factory; CreateDXGIFactory(__uuidof(IDXGIFactory), reinterpret_cast<void**>(&factory)); factory->MakeWindowAssociation(mhWindow, DXGI_MWA_NO_WINDOW_CHANGES); factory->Release(); return true; }  
      As stated on the title and displayed on the code above, regardless of it Alt+Enter still takes effect...
      I recall something from the book during the swapChain creation, where in order to create it one has to use the same factory used to create the ID3D11Device, therefore I tested and indeed using that same factory indeed it work.
      How is that one particular factory related to my window and how come the MakeWindowAssociation won't take effect with a newly created factory?
      Also what's even the point of being able to create this Factories if they won't work,?(except from that one associated with the ID3D11Device) 
    • By ProfL
      Can anyone recommend a wrapper for Direct3D 11 that is similarly simple to use as SFML? I don't need all the image formats etc. BUT I want a simple way to open a window, allocate a texture, buffer, shader.
    • By lucky6969b
      Q1:
      Since there is no more fixed pipeline rendering in DX11, for every part of rendering in DX11, do I need to create a brand-new vertex shader and pixel shader... or at least I have to find one relevant online. If you work on skinned meshes and other effects originally worked in DX9 fixed pipeline, do I have to rework everything by now?
       
      Q2:
      For assimp, if it originally was designed for DX9, like it is coupled to a DX9 device for creating meshes and materials etc. Do I have to add in the DX11 device in the assimp, or can I just leave the assimp to remain in DX9 and after the meshes are loaded, I just convert the vertex buffers and index buffers into DX11 buffers?
      Thanks
      Jack
    • By MarcusAseth
      This header is mentioned in the book I'm reading but there is no documentation on msdn... Is it like an... outdated and abandoned header?
      If so, what's the current default/recomended library for handling errors with directX?
  • Popular Now