Sign in to follow this  

Geometry shader output ordering

This topic is 1438 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I have recently come across a technique implemented by NVIDIA to generate the mesh of an implicit surface via geometry shaders.

Given their implementation, they seem to assume that two different geometry shaders executed on the same data will stream out their result in the same order.

Is there any kind of official definition that specifies whether there is a connection between input-order and output-order when executing geometry shaders?

In the given scenario, each geometry shader execution (of either shader) generates exactly one out-vertex from one in-vertex, No conditions.

 

Knowing whether this was vendor-specific or actually specified somewhere would help me a great deal smile.png

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not an assumption, it's a required part of the spec. It's actually part of the reason why geometry shaders can be slow, and why you need to specify a max vertex count for your GS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks. It's nice to know I can rely on this, although I can see the issue with performance. Makes me wonder why there is no switch (that I know of) to disable this.

Regardless, many thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder why there is no switch (that I know of) to disable this.


Largely because it wouldn't work; as soon as you need to output a primative you have to have a contiguous set of data to form that primative. So in the case of a triangle you need all 3 next to each other in memory for later processing.

If you had 4 instances of a geo-shader outputting the data for one triangle at the same time then the order becomes utterly non-deterministic for the later stages as the order could be [1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4], or [1,2,2,3,1,4,1,1,4,3,2,3,4] or any other combination depending on how the memory accesses were ordered.

There is no way for later stages to make sense of that data to build a triangle to process.
You can't add an index buffer as it would require the same data order garentee as the current geo-shader setup, and the index skipping would then slow down later stages as they hopped about memory to find the data in question.

So, basically, given what the geo-shader can do there is no sane way to do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, from a pure CPU perspective, I would cache the result on a per-thread-basis and eventually consolidate the results from all the worker-threads, thus creating correct primitives but in an arbitrary order. But I guess on a massively parallel machine like a GPU different rules apply, so I am uncertain whether such a strategy was even possible, let alone effective. And it's moot to really ponder since it is as it is. I am just trying to explain how I came to the assumption the output was not ordered. Thx again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

that's why you have to specify the max amount of primitives you will output.

Geometry shader can run in parallel, you just end up with buffers of various sizes that need to be merged if you stream out, or you have to live with those 'bubbles' which make it less efficient for the rest of the pipeline, yet it still works.

 

if there would be just one GS running at a time, then the G80 (running shaders @ 1.35GHz) would be faster with geometry shaders than the latest GPU monsters (barely reaching 1GHz stock).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1438 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this