Advertisement Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Programming method (what do you think?)

This topic is 1791 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

For instance, say you wanted to create a calculator program and then you start your ide which presents an empty form with absolutely nothing on it. You then divide the form into different parts and then specify the names and functions of each of those parts.
Name: close_button Function: end
background_color: red

Name: textbox
function: {

operator (+, -, /, *)

name: add_button
function: add{int, double, float}
operator: +

name: subtract_button
function: subtract {
int, double, float}
operator: -

name: multiply_button
function: multiply {
int, double, float}

name: divide_button
function: multiply{
int, float, double}
operator: *

Say that's a calculator with a gui, is it too verbose?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I think it looks sparse.

There is not enough information provided to allow any decent amount of customization.


Also, the event handling looks much to rigid.. do buttons only ever fire off a single type of event? The textbox has two event? or does a single event fire two functions? If it has two events, which event does the first function map to and which the second? Is the order important?


I think you'd have trouble maintaining the code... if you dropped the project for two months and came back, would you really be able to remember exactly what everything actually meant? 


I don't mean to be hard on the code... I just think that this might be a case where Verbosity is a necessary nuisance, otherwise you'll end up with too much indecipherable information. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I actually forgot what gui meant because i've been programming in the console. That's why i was worried if the language design was too verbose because programming in the console is less like the code example.
After searching for something similar in Qt, i think it's good but needs improvement.
@paragon: order won't matter and the textbox won't have just two events. I just used as an example.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until you know what you are doing, and why things work ( and don't ) the way they do, you can't even begin to improve on them.


aka "You are not god's gift to binary."

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!