• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
GuyWithBeard

Confused by the VTune profiling results

3 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I am running my application through VTune to try to find performance bottlenecks. Most of the things it points out seem logical to me, but a certain scenario looks very weird. I attached a picture showing what I mean:

 

vtune.png

 

I hope the image shows all you need, but please ask for more info if you need it.

 

My question is regarding the highlighted row. How can incrementing a float value accessed through a reference take that long? Is there something fundamentally stupid about the code above, performance-wise, that would cause the highlighted row to take that long? And if so, what should I do to make it faster? Or, are the profiling results perhaps somehow incorrect?

 

The build I am running is a release build with "normal" VS settings and debug symbols. Ie. I have not adjusted anything in particular that would come to mind.

 

Any help you can give me is greatly appreciated. Cheers!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The optimizer inlines, reorders and rewrites the code, so a line of C++ doesn't really have meaning anymore as the machine-code looks entirely different. The profiler tries to go backwards to find the C++ code that is responsible for execution time. It is probable that the generated code has everything reordered and the highlighted line is what causes any work to actually be done, so you can't really get anything more exact than adding 186 + 28 + 28 + 19 for the total loop cost.

You could go to ASM view to see what the assembly code looks like and get more exact readings.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, of course. I guess compiling that one cpp file with #pragma(optimize, off) would make the C++ more readable, but yes I should look at the asm as well. Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably, but then you wouldn't get very meaningful profiler results as it's the optimized code you want to know the performance bottlenecks for.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0