• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Saad Manzur

Visual Studio 2013 Graphics Debug

10 posts in this topic

Hi I am trying to use the Visual Studio 2013 Graphics debugger and tried to create an event group. Bute I ran into a problem while including d3d11_1.h header file . I copied the header to my include directory in June 2010 SDK's include file. But the following error pops up.

1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft directx sdk (june 2010)\include\dxgi1_2.h(1271): error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int

1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft directx sdk (june 2010)\include\dxgi1_2.h(1271): error C2143: syntax error : missing ',' before '*'

1>c:\program files (x86)\microsoft directx sdk (june 2010)\include\dxgi1_2.h(1275): error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'DXGI_RGBA'

I am have also copied over dxgi1_2.h in the include directory . What is causing this problem ? Is it a conflict problem ? Can any one give me any pointer on how to create this event group ?

I am including the directx sdk june 2010 version. And all inherited paths along with it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't just randomly splice the headers together from different SDK versions. You need to update wholesale to a recent version of the SDK.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't just randomly splice the headers together from different SDK versions. You need to update wholesale to a recent version of the SDK.

Where can I get the june 2013 sdk ? Silly question . I googled it but cannot find it . I know it is included in the windows sdk. But how can I include it ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visual Studio 2013 comes with Direct SDK built-in into Windows SDK.

In other words, you need only VS2013. Uninstall your DirectX June 2010 SDK (or whatever month it is).

However keep in mind that you will lose D3DX, which includes texture loading & other stuff.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

However keep in mind that you will lose D3DX, which includes texture loading & other stuff.

 

Then how do I load textures ? 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have to write your own loader or use a 3rd party library to do so . D3DX is a utility library and is really not required to use D3D, hence the removal in later version of the DXSDK.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

replace your header include to d3d11_1.h.

 

#include <d3d11.h> -> #include <d3d11_1.h>

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Then how do I load textures ? 

 

If you only care about *.DDS textures you can use the DirectX library's:

DirectX::CreateDDSTextureFromFileEx()
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Uninstall your DirectX June 2010 SDK (or whatever month it is).

 

There is no reason whatsoever to uninstall the old SDK. It's not clear why you would recommend that. If the poster has other applications that were built with it, a lot of valuable work could be lost.

 

Potential conflicts between the current SDK and older versions are eliminated by simply not using inappropriate references.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0