alright tnx, this fortran thing (3rd link) is close * to what im searching for
(* almost exactly but would like some more such test to
build more solid view on this)
but is this reliable?
it contains some fortran binary and source, - i ran binary on my old core2duo and got 0.3 this is not much better than the p4 results listed - (i could compile the source in gcc if someone maybe will hint me how to quick compile this fortran stuf with gcc)
as to this result list the question is:
if this is reliable this is reliable but if this is nonreliable this is nonreliable, is this reliable? ;/
looks like reliable but i am not sure how far i can belive this
it shows for example if p4 run it 0.3 second pentiums 100 runs
it about 13 seconds (it is about 40 times longer - this is more
than i thought, incidentaly i got pentium 100 mhz years ago as home computer then p4 as a home computer too, p100 was
sh*t, p4 was quite pleasurable machine, but not sure if this was
whole 40 x faster, hard to say)
yet more difference is when comparing 386/25 this takes about 300 sekonds this is quite slow (would be about 26x slower than pentium 100 * this is also very big diff - i get no 386 in my life but also it seem to me more difference then i thought, maybe this is becouse this models had no fpu (?, if not i dont know and this test is fpu)
(* and about 900 x between p4 and 386 and p4)
486/33 looks about 3 times better than 386/25 and about 7-8 times slower than p100 (pentium 100 was a weak shit, this is the worse machine i got in my life, though i remember i can run quake 1 on it and it runs fluid and my school pal/colegue got 486 there and about 1/3 of fpe in quake so maybe this 7-8x may be reliable here
has some one maybe some more results like this so i could verify this estimations? (i know this is partial but as i said i want to build estimated view)