• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
DaviDeMo

OpenGL
GLSL normal mapping strange behaviour

10 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I was trying to add a normal map effect to a shader tutorial I have found here but it's strangely flickering O.O

The vertex shader code:

 

UPDATE 2:

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/654758-glsl-normal-mapping-strange-behaviour/?view=findpost&p=5141727

 

UPDATE 1:

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/654758-glsl-normal-mapping-strange-behaviour/?view=findpost&p=5141553

#version 330


in vec3 inPosition;
in vec3 vertNormal;
in vec2 vertTexCoord;
in vec4 vertNormalMapping;

out vec3 surfacePos;
out vec3 fragNormal;
out vec2 fragTexCoord;
out vec4 fragNormalMapping;

uniform mat4 modelViewProjectionMatrix;
uniform mat4 camera;

void main(){	
    fragTexCoord = vertTexCoord;
    fragNormal = vertNormal;
    surfacePos = vec3(modelViewProjectionMatrix * vec4(inPosition, 1));
    fragNormalMapping = vertNormalMapping;



    gl_Position  = camera * modelViewProjectionMatrix * vec4(inPosition, 1.0);

	
	
}

The fragment shader

#version 330

precision highp float;


uniform vec3 cameraPosition;
uniform mat4 modelViewProjectionMatrix;
uniform sampler2D tex;
uniform sampler2D normalMap; 



uniform float materialShininess;
uniform vec3 materialSpecularColor;

uniform struct Light {
   vec3 position;
   vec3 intensities; //a.k.a the color of the light
   float attenuation;
   float ambientCoefficient;
} light;


in vec3 fragNormal;
in vec3 surfacePos;
in vec2 fragTexCoord;
in vec4 fragNormalMapping;

out vec4 finalColor;

void main() {

	
	
	 vec3 normalMap;
	 
	if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){	//has a normal map?			
		normalMap =  texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0;
		normalMap.g = 1.0-normalMap.g;

		normalMap = normalize(normalMap);
	}else{ //No normal map texture so just normal calculation
		normalMap = normalize(transpose(inverse(mat3(modelViewProjectionMatrix))) * (fragNormal));
	}
	


   
   
    vec4 surfaceColor = texture(tex, fragTexCoord);
    vec3 surfaceToLight = normalize(light.position - surfacePos);
    vec3 surfaceToCamera = normalize(cameraPosition - surfacePos);
    
    //ambient
    vec3 ambient = light.ambientCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;

    //diffuse0.0
    float diffuseCoefficient =max( dot(normalMap, surfaceToLight),0.0);
    vec3 diffuse = diffuseCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;
    
    //specular
    float specularCoefficient = 0.0;

    if(diffuseCoefficient > 0.0){		
		specularCoefficient = pow(max(0.0, dot(surfaceToCamera, reflect(-surfaceToLight, normalMap))), materialShininess);       
	}
    vec3 specular = specularCoefficient * materialSpecularColor * light.intensities;
    
    //attenuation
    float distanceToLight = length(light.position - surfacePos);
    float attenuation = 1.0 / (1.0 + light.attenuation * pow(distanceToLight, 2));

    //linear color (color before gamma correction)	 
	vec3 linearColor = ambient + attenuation*(diffuse + specular);
   
    
    //final color (after gamma correction)
    vec3 gamma = vec3(1.0/2.2);

    finalColor = vec4(pow(linearColor, gamma), surfaceColor.a);
}

For better testing I'm using a plane with a one color texture and a bump texture

this is the result

ibahVfbbiKuHRO.jpg

The light is following the camera and I can see that the normal map is calculated correctly. But as you can see there is something wrong with the "shadows" and I really don't know what it is.

 

 

 

If I load objects without a bump map the result with the same shader is perfect.

ib01goUaO1QMeA.jpg

 

thank you everyone for the help =D

Edited by DaviDeMo
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't calculate surfacePos using the (wv-)projection matrix; transform only by the world-transform part.

seems like nothing changed.. oh, yes, the normal map changed but the lines are still there :|

Later I will post the other code. Thank you

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){	//has a normal map?			
		normalMap =  texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0;
		normalMap.g = 1.0-normalMap.g;

		normalMap = normalize(normalMap);
	}else{ //No normal map texture so just normal calculation
		normalMap = normalize(transpose(inverse(mat3(modelViewProjectionMatrix))) * (fragNormal));
	}

this seems suspicious to me. In case of no normal map, you tranform object space normal to projection space, but, in case of texture normal, you just sample from texture and do not transform it to projection space. You need to create tangent space matrix, and apply tangent*world*view*projection transformation to sampled normal from texture, unless you use object space normals in your normal map.

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. I edited the code, here is the new version

 

 

 

Vertex shader

#version 330


in vec3 inPosition;
in vec3 vertNormal;
in vec2 vertTexCoord;
in vec4 vertNormalMapping;

out vec3 fragVert;
out vec3 fragNormal;
out vec2 fragTexCoord;
out vec4 fragNormalMapping;
out mat3 TBNMatrix;

uniform mat4 modelViewProjectionMatrix;
uniform mat4 camera;

void main(){	

	vec3 tangent; 
	vec3 binormal; 

	vec3 c1 = cross( vertNormal, vec3(0.0, 0.0, 1.0) ); 
	vec3 c2 = cross( vertNormal, vec3(0.0, 1.0, 0.0) ); 

	if( length(c1)>length(c2) )
	{
		tangent = c1;	
	}
	else
	{
		tangent = c2;	
	}

	tangent = normalize(tangent);

	binormal = cross(vertNormal, tangent); 
	binormal = normalize(binormal);

	mat3 normalMatrix = transpose(inverse(mat3(camera * modelViewProjectionMatrix )));
	vec3 n = normalize(normalMatrix * vertNormal);
	vec3 t = normalize(normalMatrix * tangent.xyz);
	vec3 b = normalize(normalMatrix * binormal.xyz);
	TBNMatrix = mat3(t, b, n);

	

	fragTexCoord = vertTexCoord;
    fragNormal = vertNormal;
	fragVert = inPosition;
	fragNormalMapping = vertNormalMapping;


	gl_Position  = camera * modelViewProjectionMatrix * vec4(inPosition, 1.0);

	
	
}

Fragment shader

#version 330

precision highp float;


uniform vec3 cameraPosition;
uniform mat4 modelViewProjectionMatrix;
uniform mat4 camera;
uniform sampler2D tex;
uniform sampler2D normalMap; 



uniform float materialShininess;
uniform vec3 materialSpecularColor;

uniform struct Light {
   vec3 position;
   vec3 intensities; //a.k.a the color of the light
   float attenuation;
   float ambientCoefficient;
} light;


in vec3 fragNormal;
in vec3 fragVert;
in vec2 fragTexCoord;
in vec4 fragNormalMapping;
in mat3 TBNMatrix;

out vec4 finalColor;

void main() {

	vec3 surfacePos = vec3(modelViewProjectionMatrix * vec4(fragVert, 1));
    vec4 surfaceColor = texture(tex, fragTexCoord);
    vec3 surfaceToLight = TBNMatrix * (light.position - surfacePos) ;
    vec3 surfaceToCamera = TBNMatrix * (cameraPosition - surfacePos);



	vec3 normal = normalize(texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
	

	//ambient
	vec3 ambient = light.ambientCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;
	
	//diffuse
    float diffuseCoefficient = max(0.0, dot(normal, surfaceToLight));
    vec3 diffuse = diffuseCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;

	//specular
    float specularCoefficient = 0.0;
    if(diffuseCoefficient > 0.0)
        specularCoefficient = pow(max(0.0, dot(surfaceToCamera, reflect(-surfaceToLight, normal))), materialShininess);
    vec3 specular = specularCoefficient * materialSpecularColor * light.intensities;
    
    //attenuation
    float distanceToLight = length(light.position - surfacePos);
    float attenuation = 1.0 / (1.0 + light.attenuation * pow(distanceToLight, 2));

    //linear color (color before gamma correction)
    vec3 linearColor = ambient + attenuation*(diffuse + specular);
    
    //final color (after gamma correction)
    vec3 gamma = vec3(1.0/2.2);
    finalColor = vec4(pow(linearColor, gamma), surfaceColor.a);
	
}

There is no more flickering and I see something that someone can say "mhm... it seems like this should be a normal map" but the light is... seems random O.O

When I rotate the light rotate with me in another direction creating some very strange darker sides somewhere O.O

 

You see this line? yeah. Maybe tomorrow I see where I'm wrong

i5J3tdtjFF4gU.jpg

Edited by DaviDeMo
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){
        normal = normalize(texture(heightMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
    }else{
        normal = normalize(texture(heightMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
    }

Errr I think you have a typo  

 

You are sampling the height map in both cases, shouldn't one be the normal map?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){
        normal = normalize(texture(heightMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
    }else{
        normal = normalize(texture(heightMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
    }

Errr I think you have a typo  

 

You are sampling the height map in both cases, shouldn't one be the normal map?

 

woops sorry, I edited. I did this for compile the shader without changing the c++ code xD I had to use somewhere fragNormalMapping variable for compile it =D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update of the code
 
I have added a correct TBN matrix... or I hope.
 
 
vert shader

#version 330


in vec3 inPosition;
in vec3 vertNormal;
in vec2 vertTexCoord;
in vec4 vertNormalMapping;

out vec3 fragVert;
out vec3 fragNormal;
out vec2 fragTexCoord;
out vec4 fragNormalMapping;
out mat3 TBNMatrix;
out mat3 normalMatrix;

uniform mat4 transform;
uniform mat4 camera;
uniform mat4 proj;

void main(){	

	vec3 tangent; 
	
	
	vec3 c1 = cross( vertNormal, vec3(0.0, 0.0, 1.0) ); 
	vec3 c2 = cross( vertNormal, vec3(0.0, 1.0, 0.0) ); 
	vec3 b;
	if( length(c1)>length(c2) )
	{
		tangent = c1;	
	}
	else
	{
		tangent = c2;	
	}

	tangent = normalize(tangent);
	
	

	mat4 mv = transform  * camera;//modelview
	mat4 mvp = proj * camera * transform;//modelviewprojection
	mat4 mvi = transpose(inverse(mv));//modelview inverse (=gl_NormalMatrix)

	mat3 normalMatrix = mat3(mvi);
	vec3 n = normalize( ( normalMatrix *  vertNormal )  );
	vec3 t = normalize( ( normalMatrix *  tangent.xyz ) );
	b = cross(vertNormal, tangent); 
	b = normalize(normalMatrix * b);

	TBNMatrix = mat3(t, b, n);
	TBNMatrix = transpose(TBNMatrix);
	

	fragTexCoord = vertTexCoord;
    fragNormal = vertNormal;
	fragVert = inPosition;
	fragNormalMapping = vertNormalMapping;



	gl_Position  = mvp * vec4(inPosition, 1.0);

	
	
}

 
fragment shader
 

#version 330

precision highp float;


uniform vec3 cameraPosition;
uniform mat4 transform;
uniform mat4 camera;
uniform sampler2D tex;
uniform sampler2D normalMap; 



uniform float materialShininess;
uniform vec3 materialSpecularColor;

uniform struct Light {
   vec3 position;
   vec3 intensities; //a.k.a the color of the light
   float attenuation;
   float ambientCoefficient;
} light;


in vec3 fragNormal;
in vec3 fragVert;
in vec2 fragTexCoord;
in vec4 fragNormalMapping;
in mat3 TBNMatrix;
in mat3 normalMatrix;

out vec4 finalColor;

void main() {

	vec3 surfacePos = vec3(transform  * vec4(fragVert,1.0));
    vec4 surfaceColor = texture(tex, fragTexCoord);
    vec3 surfaceToLight = normalize( light.position - surfacePos)  ;
    vec3 surfaceToCamera = normalize( cameraPosition - surfacePos) ;



	vec3 normal;
	if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){
		normal = normalize(texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
	}else{
		normal = normalize(texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
	}

	//ambient
	vec3 ambient = light.ambientCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;
	
	//diffuse
    float diffuseCoefficient = max(0.0, dot(normal, surfaceToLight));
    vec3 diffuse = diffuseCoefficient * surfaceColor.rgb * light.intensities;

	//specular
    float specularCoefficient = 0.0;
    if(diffuseCoefficient > 0.0)
        specularCoefficient = pow(max(0.0, dot(surfaceToCamera, reflect(-surfaceToLight, normal))), materialShininess);
    vec3 specular = specularCoefficient * materialSpecularColor * light.intensities;
    
    //attenuation
    float distanceToLight = length(light.position - surfacePos);
    float attenuation = 1.0 / (1.0 + light.attenuation * pow(distanceToLight, 2));

    //linear color (color before gamma correction)
    vec3 linearColor = ambient + attenuation*(diffuse + specular);
    
    //final color (after gamma correction)
    vec3 gamma = vec3(1.0/2.2);
    finalColor = vec4(pow(linearColor, gamma), surfaceColor.a);
	
} 

The result is still wrong :-(

 

ior1DN7SXURAI.jpg

 

mhm... O.O

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing is first: you're not even using the TBN! :D You need to take the TBN and multiply it to your normal map, otherwise what's the point? tongue.png

 

A side note: I don't trust your TBN calculations as they don't actually use the triangle data, but some arbitrary directions. This isn't a trustworthy approach and even if you use it, I don't expect proper results from it.

 

Instead, try this in your fragment shader (pulled from my engine, you're welcome happy.png):

mat3 ComputeCotangentFrame( vec3 vNormal, vec3 vPosition, vec2 vTexCoord )
{
	vec3 ddxPos = dFdx(vPosition);
	vec3 ddyPos = dFdy(vPosition);
	vec2 ddxUV = dFdx(vTexCoord);
	vec2 ddyUV = dFdy(vTexCoord);

	vec3 vCrossVec1 = cross( ddyPos, vNormal );
	vec3 vCrossVec2 = cross( vNormal, ddxPos );
	vec3 vTangent = vCrossVec1 * ddxUV.x + vCrossVec2 * ddyUV.x;
	vec3 vBinormal = vCrossVec1 * ddxUV.y + vCrossVec2 * ddyUV.y;

	float fDotT = dot( vTangent, vTangent );
	float fDotB = dot( vBinormal, vBinormal );
	float fInvMax = 1.0 / sqrt(max(fDotT, fDotB));

	return mat3( vTangent * fInvMax, vBinormal * fInvMax, vNormal );
}

Inputs are vertex normal, world position and texture coordinates.

 

 

Next, why do you apply a transform matrix to the vertex position in the fragment shader? This is most definitely better done in the vertex shader and passed in.

 

And finally, what's the point of this:

vec3 normal;
	if(fragNormalMapping[0] == 1.0f){
		normal = normalize(texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
	}else{
		normal = normalize(texture(normalMap, fragTexCoord).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0);
	}

You're doing the same thing twice regardless of the branch, so why bother?

 

 

Once you get everything working, you can look into replacing the Cotangent stuff I supplied with standard tangent/binormal calculations on the CPU and pass them in as vertex attributes. Unless you don't mind the performance overhead of computing it all on the fly per-pixel (you'll gain some memory savings by not storing them ;D), or you're doing all shading/materials on the GPU in a procedural deferred pass like I am... which I highly doubt anyone is doing. tongue.png

Edited by Styves
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, thank you.

Sorry for the "fragNormalMapping", it is initialized and I have to use it somewhere for build the shader D= I need to change the c++ code, I know :-( I will do it when everything is working =D

 

Your code is very usefull, now I can make some testing. I have written the code (with the help of google and this guy www.terathon.com/code/tangent.html ) for make the calculatio in CPU, but for now let see if it's working with your code.

 

I have only a question that maybe... maybe it's a little stupid. The sampler2d normalMap variable is just a RGB as it is from the normal map texture. Do I have to normalize it to -1 and +1 via CPU or the code I have should work?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:D

 

Leave your normal map as is. Scaling it to -1,1 on CPU would require storage that supports signed data (so more than your standard RGB texture).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
    • By Tchom
      Hey devs!
       
      I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.
       
      Vertex Shader
      uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
      precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
    • By yahiko00
      Hi,
      Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
      For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
      I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
      I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

      Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
      Any insight would be appreciated
    • By afraidofdark
      I have just noticed that, in quake 3 and half - life, dynamic models are effected from light map. For example in dark areas, gun that player holds seems darker. How did they achieve this effect ? I can use image based lighting techniques however (Like placing an environment probe and using it for reflections and ambient lighting), this tech wasn't used in games back then, so there must be a simpler method to do this.
      Here is a link that shows how modern engines does it. Indirect Lighting Cache It would be nice if you know a paper that explains this technique. Can I apply this to quake 3' s light map generator and bsp format ?
  • Popular Now