• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Input Mapping

3 posts in this topic

I am struggling to map inputs from different devices to actions (i.e jump).  Axes are giving me the majority of the issue.


I have started by creating an Action class.  The idea was Action can bind one action to one device button/axis by calling fcn Add().  The game code decides what device is active, so correct usage of Add() is left to the user.


The usage would be like this.


Action jump;



jump.Add(sf::Joystick::Axis::Y);               // Problem


The problem is an axis is not a button.  An axis has two max ranges and a button has one.  Should I add another thin layer to differentiate between this.  For example, Joystick::Axis::YMin and Joystick::Axis::YMax.  Or am I in this position, because of poor design choices?  Maybe I should not be trying to treat axes and buttons as the same.


I have included Action.h below, because I wanted to get some feedback.  I am concerned my approach may be incorrect.  Particularly, my attempt to hold each devices input type.  I have read a number of articles (including this one here at gamedev.net) , but the topic of input mapping seems to be glossed over.

class Action : public Event
   enum Type
      Trigger,  // one time use
      RealTime, // holds state (poll it)
      Range,    // axis 

   Action(Type type, const Event& gameEvent);

   void Add(sf::Keyboard::Key key);
   void Add(sf::Mouse::Button button);
   void Add(sf::Vector2i cursor);
   void Add(unsigned int button);
   void Add(sf::Joystick::Axis axis);

   void Remove(sf::Keyboard::Key key);
   void Remove(sf::Mouse::Button button);
   void Remove(sf::Vector2i cursor);
   void Remove(unsigned int button);
   void Remove(sf::Joystick::Axis axis);

   void HandleEvent(const sf::Event inputEvent);

   virtual SendEvent(); // inherited from Event

   const Type mType;
   const Event mGameEvent;

   sf::Keyboard::Key mKeyboardKey;
   sf::Mouse::Button mMouseButton;
   sf::Vector2i mMouseCursor;
   unsigned int mJoystickButton;
   sf::Joystick::Axis mJoystickAxis;

   static std::vector<Action*> mInputMapping;



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The article you linked specifically deals with precisely this problem.


You're missing a layer. There should be inputs from actual devices, a mapping layer, and [i]then[/i] the layer that actually responds to events/input axes from the mapping system.



The article should have code linked that gives a concrete example of the architecture.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the three layer summaries from the article.


1. The first layer gathers raw input data from the hardware, and optionally normalizes ranged inputs

2. The second layer examines what game contexts are active, and maps the raw inputs into high-level actions, states, and ranges. These are then passed on to a series of callbacks

3. The third layer receives the callbacks and processes the input in priority order, performing game activity as needed



My first layer passes SFML input data to my second layer.  My second layer handles input mapping and dispatching (context switching is ignored for the time being).  While I did not implement callbacks, I thought I had handled dispatching of input with my function SendEvent().  If a component is listening for a particular action it will be notified when it is occurs.  The third layer is the game code that handles the callbacks, or in my case each component's HandleEvent function.

Edited by Kanefa

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0