• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
nickyc95

Separating axis Theorem rotation issue

7 posts in this topic

Hello there, 

 

I am trying to get SAT working within my 2d game using Windows 8 and DirectX (DirectXTK).

 

However i have run into an issue which I cannot figure out.

 

(I have uploaded a video to youtube that demonstrates the issue)

 

When the boxes are AABB the collision works great, when i rotate the boxes the axis "flys" off and the boxes dont collide properly because of this.

 

 

YOUTUBE LINK : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7Nh0j7d_S0&feature=youtu.be

(IGNORE THE WHITE BOXES TO THE LEFT OF THE SCREEN)

 

If anyone has any ideas about what could be causing this please let me know. Also if you would like to see the code, please post and tell me.

 

Thanks! 

Edited by nickyc95
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post your code.  Looks like the way you are calculating the axis is wrong.

If you look at the top it looks like the Axis is being projected on the the X plane.

This is how I calculate the Axis.

[source lang="csharp"]

for (int x = 0; x < Points.Count; x++)
            {
                Vector3 p1 = Points[x];
                Vector3 p2 = Points[x + 1 == Points.Count ? 0 : x + 1];
                Vector3 edge = p1 - p2;
                var A = new Vector2(-edge.X, edge.Y);
                A.Normalize();
                Axis.Add(A);
            }

[/source]

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@nicky95

 

It's hard to tell exactly what goes wrong without seeing any code.

 

@CJThomas

 

It seems like you are doing vector normalization in your code. This isn't necessary and requires a lot of cpu time. Your code should work just fine even if you remove "A.Normalize();"

 

Cheers,

Mike

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


It seems like you are doing vector normalization in your code. This isn't necessary and requires a lot of cpu time

 

Just curious as I don't know and would like to - when I use dot product to project a vertex onto an axis in SAT, I use the fact that the axis vector is normalized to give me the distance along the axis as the simple result of the dot product. How do you retrieve this if the axis vector isn't normalized?

 

Is it just a case of dividing the result by the length of the axis vector? If so, you still need the length of the axis vector, which is the slow bit of normalization.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aardvajk. I don't actually calculate the distance, since it is not needed. If you want the distance, you need to solve the Pythagorean theorem, which means calling square root. It's getting late here in Europe so I won't go into a lengthy explanation on SAT, but here are some links you might find useful:

 

http://www.geometrictools.com/Documentation/MethodOfSeparatingAxes.pdf

 
Cheers,
Mike
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


@CJThomas



It seems like you are doing vector normalization in your code. This isn't necessary and requires a lot of cpu time. Your code should work just fine even if you remove "A.Normalize();"

Thanks for the Tip.  I have removed that line and it works fine

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Hi Aardvajk. I don't actually calculate the distance, since it is not needed.

 

Oh of course, you can compare the squared distances to check for overlaps. Doh! :)

 

Thanks for the links.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


It seems like you are doing vector normalization in your code. This isn't necessary and requires a lot of cpu time

 

Just curious as I don't know and would like to - when I use dot product to project a vertex onto an axis in SAT, I use the fact that the axis vector is normalized to give me the distance along the axis as the simple result of the dot product. How do you retrieve this if the axis vector isn't normalized?

 

Is it just a case of dividing the result by the length of the axis vector? If so, you still need the length of the axis vector, which is the slow bit of normalization.

 

Aardvark, your instincts are correct. The dot product gives: Dot(A,B) = |A||B|Cos(Theta), so ( Dot(A,B) ) / |B| gives the distance of A projected onto B, which simplifies to dot(a,b) when b is a unit length vector.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0