• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ZwodahS

Question regarding Box2D

7 posts in this topic

I had implemented a few platforming games (just to learn the basics), and had always use simple AABB collision test. 

If I just want to make a simple platformer game like say Mario or Megaman, the kind without complex Physics, is there any reason to use Box2D or is there any reason NOT to use Box2D ?

 

I have always been told by friends that I should use a physics engine instead of writing my own collision code, but I always have the impression that Box2D will be overkill for a simple platformer game. Advice?

 

 

 

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that, for a simple platformer game, using Box2D will be way harder than creating your own logic.

 

Box2D is great when you need fancy solid bodies physics. But all a simple platformer needs is usually gravity, basic friction and collision.

 

Look at this code:

https://code.google.com/p/box2d/source/browse/trunk/Box2D/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cpp

 

It is an example Box2D that creates a "Box" and a "Ground" rectangles and then, when the simulation starts, the Box falls to the ground. It spits its angle and positions to the console. As you can see, the code is an overly complex solution for a simple problem. Of course, that is just example code, as an overview of B2D general usage. This complexity surely pays off when the necessary physics are complex as well, but, for a 2D platformer, I'd keep it simpler.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for the reply. I thought so. What about using Box2D just for collision detection ? or it is just easier to do AABB.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used box2d to make Pong. That's overkill. But it was a fun experience, and helped me learn box2d and it's applications.

 

Saying box2d is overkill for a platformer means nothing if you don't have the full list of features of the game, and none of those features include anything remotely complex and related to movement, collision and collision response.

 

I'd say, try getting as far as you can without adding new movement/collision/response code. If you can implement your whole game without adding code for these things, you're golden. If you find yourself adding new code for these things because you need them, consider box2d.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about using Box2D just for collision detection ? or it is just easier to do AABB.

If you plan on using B2D for collision, there is no practical way to not use it for the rest.

 

It will need to do all the simulation and you'll still need to create all the body definitions and use world.Step(...) for it to detect the collisions. Or, you'd need to update the world by hand, by calling SetTransform and whatnot, every time a physical entity in your game moved...

Really, not the most practical approach. If you ever decide to use Box2D to detect the collisions, it would probably be wiser to go ahead and use it for the whole simulation as well.

 

 

Saying box2d is overkill for a platformer means nothing if you don't have the full list of features of the game

I answered based on what he said in the first post.

 

If I just want to make a simple platformer game like say Mario or Megaman, the kind without complex Physics
Edited by dejaime
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Saying box2d is overkill for a platformer means nothing if you don't have the full list of features of the game

I answered based on what he said in the first post.
 

If I just want to make a simple platformer game like say Mario or Megaman, the kind without complex Physics

I know, i wasn't replying to you. I also fully agree with what you said, i just gave a different perspective on the issue. :) I just find that even these seemingly simple games tend to get more complex as development continues, unless you have a very clearly defined goal and list of features.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be possible to write a separate character controller using the collision part of the library directly rather than having the controller part of the simulation, but it would be tough. Absolutely only worth it if you wanted a character controller interacting with a world that was otherwise a physics simulation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played around with it today and I realized that it is a full fledged physics simulation and I don't think I need the full feature of a physics simulation in my game.

I also think that it is overkill if I use it just for collision detection.

 

However, I will think about all the things that I will possibly need and see if any of them requires good physics engine.

 

Thanks for the discussion =D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0