Sign in to follow this  
doubstract

OpenGL models, textures loading

Recommended Posts

doubstract    102

Hello everyone. I just have started learning OpenGL, and i have a problem. I am reading OpenGL SuperBible, i have all sample code, models, textures and other stuff from that book. I just have reached topic about textures, models and everything is okay, but models in samples are in "SBM" format, and textures are in "KTX". All i want to load models in other format(obj,3ds), and load textures in png or other popular format. How i can do it? Please, give me some code or something. I have downloaded all samples from here: openglsuperbible.com and I am programming with C++. Thanks for help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
arka80    1959

you can give a try at soil lib for image loading and assimp for models loading.

Unluckly, opengl is not a full framework like DX, it only cover the rendering side of the whole thing. You have to do yourself everything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
haegarr    7372

… and load textures in png or other popular format. ...

Don't confuse "popular for the web" with "popular for 3D". Notice that PNG and similar popular image formats are for other, typically general purposes. Not all of them support an alpha channel (PNG does, e.g. JPG does not), only a few allows to store HDR images, nearly none of them allows to store multi resolution images, nearly none of them allows to store MIP map levels, nearly none of them allows to store array layers, nearly none of them support storing of multiple faces natively, probably none of them allows to store image data pre-encoded with a GPU friendly compression, and none (to my knowledge) of them allows to do all at once. The reason to use especially KTX is that it is one of the very very few public formats that allows for all of that. For example, to represent a 1024^3 texel cube map with pre-computed MIP mapping, you would need to use 6 faces by ld(1024) = 60 (!) PNG files where a single KTX file would be sufficient (this is, of course, a strong example, but nevertheless not unrealistic).

 

A usual way of handling texture resources is to let the artist store the asset in an appropriate format. This may be PNG or the like as long as the format would preserve all necessary features. Professionally formats like OpenEXR are more likely to be used when the demands grow. The resource processing then will read in images in the chosen format and convert / integrate them internally to a texture. Insofar your request for loading other formats is not untypical. However, don't be trapped in thinking that textures are like "ordinary" images; they are not! They are special!

Edited by haegarr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now