• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Paul C Skertich

Upon compiling with Nvidia SDK 3.3.1 - I get This Operator is not allowed as a constant expression

4 posts in this topic

I did post about this on the NVIDIA form but never got word back. When I would include the header and library - a intellisense error shows up:

This operator is not allowed as a constant expression.

 

Okay, so I looked at where the issue was gerenerating from PxPreprocessing.h line:
 

#if !defined(PX_APPLE)
PX_COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT(PX_OFFSET_OF(PxPackValidation,a) == 8);
#endif

So I looked at the PX_COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT macro defination.

#define PX_COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT(exp)	typedef char PxCompileTimeAssert_Dummy[(exp) ? 1 : -1]

I couldn't figure it out why I couldn't just include some headers and libraries from PhysX - so I commented out the PX_COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT since I'm not using Apple only Windows.

 

In the future though - how would I be able to over come this issue without having to comment out? Are there some preprocessing definations I'm missing to include inside my project?

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point is that the compile-time assertion actually is failing. Have you checked that? Note that maybe this assert was left over from an older version of the code and can be removed safely, but in any case, this kind of code is supposed to trip a compile error when the condition is not met. It won't generate a pretty error message, but it will fail the build.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point is that the compile-time assertion actually is failing. Have you checked that? Note that maybe this assert was left over from an older version of the code and can be removed safely, but in any case, this kind of code is supposed to trip a compile error when the condition is not met. It won't generate a pretty error message, but it will fail the build.

Yeah I uncommented this making it compile without the error. I should bring it up to Nvidia and check to make sure uncommenting the declaration was a safe idea. Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I've had that since switching to VS2013 (or 2012?). The assert is not failing, it's just a harmless IntelliSense false positive: you can either ignore it or comment it away.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm about a month late to the discussion, but I think I have the answer:

PX_OFFSET_OF uses the offsetof macro.

The C++ version of the offsetof macro in Visual Studio's stddef.h has a reinterpret_cast in it.

Visual Studio 2013 Intellisense does not appear to accept reinterpret_cast in a constant expression, while Visual Studio 2012 was able to handle it just fine.

I tested this with a plain struct, and when I wrote up a similar expression with a C-style pointer cast instead of the C++ style reference cast, it had no problem with it.

It also looks like it would work if the file with that header is compiled as C instead of C++, because there is a C-style version of the macro in the header file that gets used in that case.

Anyway, I believe offsetof should be usable for this sort of thing, and the problem appears to only occur with Intellisense, not the compiler, so I would complain to Microsoft, not NVIDIA.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0