• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Doublefris

Matrix "sign"

5 posts in this topic

These matrices ( A & B ) both qualify as being orthogonal.

 

\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \]

\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} -1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \]

 

Furthermore, my code says their quaternion representation is actually the same ( both the identity quaternion). glm gives me { 1/sqrt(2), 0, 0, 0 } for B curiously.

 

Also I know that det(A) = 1 and det(B) = -1

 

So I guess that orthogonal matrices have some sort of "sign" property to them, that gives the handedness of the basis? And how this work with quaternions? I suspect it might have some relation to the famous 'double cover' property of quaternions that people always mention. Basically the fact that Q and -Q correspond to the same rotation. I also wonder if this works for complex numbers as well as they're the 2d equivalent of quaternions.

 

Are there any other properties involving this 'sign'? I have a vague feeling it had something to do with the diagonal as well.

 

Maybe someone here has some deeper insights or facts to share about this smile.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That second matrix is not orthogonal and its determinant is zero. Did you mean this one?

\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} -1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \]

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That second matrix is not orthogonal and its determinant is zero. Did you mean this one?

\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} -1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \]

 

Corrected. Also did not know we could use latex in here.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


So I guess that orthogonal matrices have some sort of "sign" property to them, that gives the handedness of the basis?

Definitely no.

The math doesn't care where the thumbs are attached to your hands. "Handedness" comes into play when you visualize the results in real world, e.g. on the screen. The identity matrix always looks like your 1st matrix.

Your 2nd matrix performs a mirror operation. In general, if the determinant is negative, the transformation includes mirroring.

In this sense, there is a relationship between this "sign" and handedness: To project vectors from left- to a right handed coordinates, you can use a mirror operation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These matrices ( A & B ) both qualify as being orthogonal.
 
[background=#f7f7f7]\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} 1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \][/background]
[background=#f7f7f7]\[ \left [ \begin{matrix} -1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &1 &0 \\ 0 &0 &1 \end{matrix} \right ] \][/background]

So far, so good.

 

Furthermore, my code says their quaternion representation is actually the same ( both the identity quaternion).

I don't know what code you are referring to, but the second one cannot be represented by a quaternion, so things might not make a lot of sense.

 

glm gives me { 1/sqrt(2), 0, 0, 0 } for B curiously.

Perhaps the fact the quaternion you get doesn't have length 1 is an indication that something went wrong?

 

Also I know that det(A) = 1 and det(B) = -1

Correct.

 

So I guess that orthogonal matrices have some sort of "sign" property to them, that gives the handedness of the basis?

Yes. Orthogonal matrices are invertible, and the sign of the determinant of an invertible matrix is an important number. If you interpret the matrix as representing a change of basis, positive determinant means the bases have the same orientation.

 

And how this work with quaternions?

It doesn't. Unit-length quaternions can only represent rotations, whose determinant is 1.

 

I suspect it might have some relation to the famous 'double cover' property of quaternions that people always mention. Basically the fact that Q and -Q correspond to the same rotation.

I suspect you are wrong. smile.png

 

I also wonder if this works for complex numbers as well as they're the 2d equivalent of quaternions.

I am not sure what "this" is.

 

Are there any other properties involving this 'sign'? I have a vague feeling it had something to do with the diagonal as well.
 
Maybe someone here has some deeper insights or facts to share about this smile.png

No, sorry. I don't have anything deep to say about this.

EDIT: If you want to read something about it, this sign you are talking about is what separates the group O(3) into two halves, one of which is the subgroup of 3D rotations, SO(3). Edited by Álvaro
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0