• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Acharis

Enemies of a dictator

6 posts in this topic

For a strategy game where you are a dictator.

 

Who are your enemies (especially internal)? I want to avoid the "population uprising and demanding beloved democracy" thing :D

Also, I don't necessarily want to portrait the dictator as the evil one, definitely not a saint or someone who would hesitate to kill some dissidents, but not necessarily opressing everyone all the time or being bad for his nation as a whole.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


A sub-portion of the population uprising and demanding beloved communism (i.e. Red Guard vs White Guard vs Imperialists, in pre-communistic Russia, or in pre-communistic China)
I don't know about China, but there never was any communistic revolution in Russia. The revolution was by "democratic" forces against monarchy, the democratic one won and established a government. Then there was a military coup by the communist faction who usurped the power and announced communist system. Then the propaganda rebranded these two separate military struggles into one "revolution of the masses" :D

 

My point is, population should be treated neutral/passive and only/mostly factions should be the enemy. Only if there is a big ecenomic discontent the general population would uprise. But under normal condition, the population should be treated as resource, you try to win their support (propaganda) and reduce support of the opposing factions/rebels.

 

Check the part of David_Galula (government vs insurgency + population as a resource):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-insurgency#David_Galula

 

Also Andean Abyss boardgame have it portrayed nicely, 4 factions (the governement (dictator), communist rebels, capitalist rebels (might help the government in fight against communists), narcotic barons):

http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/91080/andean-abyss

 

 

Religion & ethnic - I think these are too grim/dark for a game. No one would want to play a dictator who kill people for stupid reasons... Inevitable sacrifaces "on the way to the brigher future" is one thing, proactive extermination of population is another. I want to aim for a lighter mood :)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Tropico 4 (I havn't played the earlier ones), you are a dictator in a small "banana republic"

It's quite light hearted even though you can do things like order executions to stop strikes.

 

There most things you do will give you + and - on both internal and external factions.

 

Internal are groups like "communists, religious, military, environmentalists" and a few more.

Any of them can give you problems on their own, but you don't have to please everyone...

 

External are the super powers of the world, which you also have to please to get good prices for your exports and not get hit by sanctions...

 

Just wanted to drop the name here if you hadn't looked at it already.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Just wanted to drop the name here if you hadn't looked at it already.
I did :)

Actually the system they used is a copy of factions system of ancient Dictator from ZX Spectrum (remake here: http://www.nrtoone.com/dictator/ ). The thing is, in Tropico the faction system is too meaningless (you can ignore it and just go for general happiness of the population) while in Dictator it was too important (the only thing that mattered in the whole game was how supportive to you & strong a faction was). Both implementations kind of didn't grab my heart...

 

I try making something like: You have a population and care for their well being. Also you have various factions (some/most possibly only disruptive) that stay in your way. So there are two separate things you do in the game, economy & happines of population and dealing with powerful factions & rebels & usurpers & political enemies & dissidents & coups & assassinations. Kind of not make it one sided (only political as in Dictator, only economic as in Tropico). I feel the key to this might be separation of factions and population...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A sub-portion of the population uprising and demanding beloved communism (i.e. Red Guard vs White Guard vs Imperialists, in pre-communistic Russia, or in pre-communistic China)

I don't know about China, but there never was any communistic revolution in Russia.

I don't have much knowledge of either Chinese and Russian history, so you're probably correct. According to a quick glance at Wikipedia, the communists (or socialists?) overthrew the nation in 1917, but then the Russian Civil War between the communists (Reds) and anti-communists (Whites) broke out immediately afterward in 1918. The Reds were against the royal family, and I don't know if the Whites were either. So Reds overthrew the Imperials and the Whites attempted to overthrow the Reds but the Reds triumphed there also.
I might have it completely butchered - my historic interests lies elsewhere.

China was in the middle of civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists when war broke out with Imperial Japan in WW2 (the Communists were winning) - then they joined together to fight against Japan (a losing battle), before starting up the fighting again post-Japan, and the Communists quickly mopped up the Nationalists (they arranged it so that the Nationalists would take the worst of Japan's aggressions). I possibly have that butchered also.
 

My point is, population should be treated neutral/passive and only/mostly factions should be the enemy. Only if there is a big ecenomic discontent the general population would uprise. But under normal condition, the population should be treated as resource, you try to win their support (propaganda) and reduce support of the opposing factions/rebels.

Absolutely. Most of the population of any nation, including the USA, is middle-ground and shift their support around depending on what they perceive to benefit themselves or what they perceive to be morally good or good for the country as a whole. This is influenced by vocal groups trying to rally supported for their groups' agendas. Alliances and alignments are very fluid.
 

Religion & ethnic - I think these are too grim/dark for a game. No one would want to play a dictator who kill people for stupid reasons... Inevitable sacrifaces "on the way to the brigher future" is one thing, proactive extermination of population is another. I want to aim for a lighter mood smile.png

You asked who your enemies are. You cannot please every religion, and not even every sect of a single religion. So unless you tread very carefully, you (as a dictator) are bound to displease some group, even if your rule is a religiously-tolerated freedom-of-religion rule (like Saddam Hussein's mostly was).
And just because the dictator (you) and your ruling party isn't racist, that doesn't mean ethnic groups won't rise up complaining about favoritism.

You could use made up ethnicities, and have them be very close together in appearance. The game doesn't have to support murdering people who have different colored skins - it could be as simple as "Group A historically descended from the people on the north side of the river, group B historically descended from the people on the south side of the river", you could then have Northerners claim that Southerners are favored by your ruling party, because your Chief Economic Advisor happens to be of Southern descent, and because the new school you built happened to have been built in a predominantly Southern-populated block of town (the game could detect these kinds of situations, and use them as semi-legitimate complains that the opposition groups use to rally crowds). The minority Earterners could complain that they are being overlooked, and accuse the local Westerner officials of incompetence and corruption.

Call them Little Endians and Big Endians if you must. wink.png Edited by Servant of the Lord
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe let's try to bite it from the "factions" side. What kind of factions (powerfull enough to organize rebelion/coup against the dictator) exist inside a country?

 

I look especially for Central America theme (banana republics) or some dictators on Pacific islands. So no religion or ethnic problems.

 

 


"Group A historically descended from the people on the north side of the river, group B historically descended from the people on the south side of the river"
:D Yeah, fictional rasism sounds quite all right :D
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0