• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
moeen k

best way to make game difficulty in video game

4 posts in this topic

I want to know if you were working on a fps game or a shooter game which way you had to choose to change different range of difficulty to your game.

 

In many game they just change player health. I think cod is a good example of it.  I think there is nothing just in veteran when an enemy shoots at you you die easier and faster.

 

in many games they add more or less enemies there or other games work on enemy health or I think that some teams do the hard thing and change the ai in different difficulties.

 

Now I don't remember an example. but now I'm working on a project that core idea is about ai. I'm trying to make a class of enemies that you cant kill them easily not only because they are only better armed than you but they can behave much better than you.

maybe there are places in games that make you stop in a place to kill just 2 enemies for half an hour because when you change your place for better aim they change their shelter too or when you move your head or move out your hide they shoot you with best accuracy and its great to make a feeling that player is weaker than ai enemies and i think if I make ai best I can it is a good achievement for me(I call it fps chess) but I think it makes my game less likeable.

 

As I'm a great fan of cod i think its sells most because everyone can play it. there is just an enemy gallery for you to shoot and die for you and it makes game faster but I want to do the thing against that.

I dont want to put an ai dificulty level there and i dont know how to make it that everyone enjoy even little age medicore gamers. thank you

Edited by jbadams
Edited post to be more readable. :)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think there would be a better way, or better a most less wrong way. Or better you need to decide in allotted time what to do and what could be done in time. Which often is a compromise. When is there the time to do it right. it's done when it done. 

 

Example of more health. Any thing could influence the gameplay. Health to more leeway to take huge risk. Faster pace more rushing. Other way  

like If enemies are less accurate, you just keep more distance but in close range it doesn't matter. Games could be linear and corridor based with lots to close encounters.

More health means. Much more time to react. Making wrong responsive decision don't weight that heavy. Having much more chance to get through a ambush. Wenn not you move slower and more observing to spot first the opfor dose you.

 

What this means if you go for action rich epic story regular game are hanging back. Might not be the game flow you intended.

 

I do think there is a right way but it's to costly to develop.

 

You also need to know very much about the gamer. Ask that when showing the difficulty screen. |then the game adopts to player in way he prefer.

 

If you are into deep story you want a good story flow game experience. So don't replay a part to much better not at all.

If you are a action gamer you want to have fun it's less about survival but more ammo rich environment. high number but effective weapons.

Then those very hardcore player who want to be challenged.

 

these kind of gamer exist in all skill levels but need different adoption.

 

Also mostly the game flow difficulty is very variable. While mid and end part should be going up they could be walk in the park, but there are point replayed dozen times.

 

A very costly to implement way could be. Taunting and reputation. If you are good the AI adapts to more care full approach. Calling reinforcements before they going in.

while if your barely move forward. The opposing force get more risky and let it know by letting you know your time has come and going after you without backup.

 

I more a games who want to shoot and just follow the story line. Having some core gameplay action. Without end bosses QTE or cut scenes.

 

Normally I choose Easy or normal. But some games Hard is easy.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Objective based FPS games such as GoldenEye 007, Perfect Dark, and TimeSplitters handled different levels of difficulty in similar ways. In harder difficulties, there were often more objectives that had to be completed. Sometimes this completely changed the way one would progress through a level - TimeSplitters in particular often placed the level exit closer to the starting point on easier difficulties so there were portions of the level you would only see on the harder difficulties. Also in all of these games, guards were given slightly more health, their reaction speed increased, their accuracy increased, and they did more damage. Pickups also were different - on easy difficulties, ammo is not a problem and guards drop plenty of it, but in harder difficulties ammo becomes a scarce resource that you must carefully manage. Harder difficulties also had fewer body armour placements.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the objective-based approach that Ludus mentions - give them additional challenges or handicaps to overcome. I like limiting resources or enhanced enemy AI (e.g. special tactics), I can deal with increased enemy numbers or toughness. I really hate turning every enemy into headshot kings. That falls into cheating/not fun territory for me. I feel that from a game narrative perspective it's always better if the player understands why and how they were killed in most circumstances, and has the opportunity to think about how to fix the problem. If your "fault" was that all enemies know your exact X/Y/Z co-ordinates and can fire perfectly in one frame... that breaks the narrative. There's no "what could I have done better?".

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0