• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
_w4r10ck

OpenGL
With OpenGL, should I use GLut or SDL?

5 posts in this topic

Hello GameDev.net community.

Operating System   : Ubuntu 12.04 LTS     
Currently Learning : OpenGL using GLut  

Languages : C/C++

"IDE": gedit + gnome-terminal

 

Trying to avoid being voluble, I settled that i would use a powerful and reliable graphics library which would give me support to 3D graphics and also flexibility using C++. After doing some research I turned to OpenGL, which gave me not just reliability but also facility on my operating system. Although It is a possible perfect choice, I still have some issues about using GLut, Would i achieve better performance using it or SDL? and what about the portability?  SDL is widely used not just with OpenGL but also to make games and applications. SDL is very powerful and not so specific as GLut. I am using GLut for studying and creating small applications, but I don't think it would be so powerful as SDL for creating games ( that is my goal =] ).

Am I interpreting GLut wrong? would it be better?

 

TIA.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your ultimate goal is to create games that you want to sell and redistribute, don't use GLUT (unless you absolutely HAVE to), and chances are you will not have any solid reasons to use it.  SDL has much more to offer as a game dev then GLUT does.  As it was already mentioned, GLUT is really old and is not actively maintained.  SDL, however, is and is much more suitable for games as it was largely inspired for such usage.

 

In my experience, I have experienced better control and performance using SDL.  GLUT is widely supported on nearly every OS, but implementing controls using GLUT is not feasible to say the least.  I wrote a very simple game using GLUT on Windows once, and thought it worked fine for the most part, but when I ported it to other OSes, the controls were not nearly as smooth for what a game should have, because they were not suited for games (the keyboard timestamp feature will annoy you and everyone else who plays your game; also, the mouse input is not very smooth or accurate enough).  SDL takes a bit more work to setup, but it's worth it.

 

Lastly, using GLUT, you are limited to legacy OpenGL, afaik.  With SDL 2.0, you can easily create a context for the latest OpenGL version you want/need.  This should be a deal breaker for GLUT in most cases alone.

 

Before I wrap up my response, I will give a small defense for GLUT.  I actually have my latest game using GLUT atm.  The reason why I chose GLUT (at the time at least) was because it was easy to setup, and my game in particular with it's mechanics were much easier to get up and running using GLUT.  Another reason is that GLUT's borderless window was proven invaluable when deving and debugging on MacOSX.  Lastly, I initially started writing my game on MacOSX, not knowing much of anything about OpenGL for Mac.  GLUT just felt right at that moment, and it ultimately saved me much time, energy, frustration and needless hassle (there are some features in my game I never would have considered if I didn't use GLUT), but ultimately, using GLUT in a commercial game comes with a price.  Since GLUT is not actively maintained, you are risking future compatibility with new OSes.  The same old glut32.dll or GLUT.framework is not guaranteed to be working on the next Windows or MacOSX, respectively, due to possible removal of a specific API or something.  That probably won't happen, but it can, and it's not worth the risk, IMO.  When it's time for the release, I will likely switch to SDL to avoid that potential land mine.

 

My recommendation to you is to learn the basics of SDL 2.0.  Don't bother with the deprecated SDL 1.x, and it's easy to get the two confused as many things have changed for the better, causing some functionality not to work (Example, if you want SDL 2.0 controller functionality, use this, not the legacy stuff because it won't work).

 

Don't worry about GLUT or legacy OpenGL.  If your card/drivers support it, start learning OpenGL 4.1 or later.

 

Shogun.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use SFML, but I think I'll change to SDL 2.X by the fact that I'm not using all SFML features (like OpenGL rendering) and was a pain in the ass to get working on VS2013 (I took an template from a guy at the library's forum). Again, nothing agaist SFML.

Edited by Irlan R.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 
@ilreh
I used  Windows in the past, and I tried to use Vim there (Not like a hardware Vim user). Saying goodbye to WIndows, I moved to Ubuntu, and after 4 months I have my Internet cutted off. After that, I noticed that I didn't install Vim on my Ubuntu and today I regret having to use gedit. There is a console version of Vim on my PC, but is not so good as the 'interfaced' one I used on Windows.
Now I just have Internet access at work, and I need to thank you for making me remeber to download it !
I will need to improve my linux-installing-fu to install it, because I am I Linux noob. And now I will need to install SDL too !

Thus, Thank you.

 

@Promit

Thank you!

 

@blueshogun96

Thank you!

 

" I actually have my latest game using GLUT."
You mean Loop-til?

 

@Irlan R.
Nothing against SFML, but I prefer Allegro over it, and SDL over Allegro.
Thank you!

Edited by _w4r10ck
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now