• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AODBAMF

Intersection distance of Ray and Plane

3 posts in this topic

Hi, I'm really confused about the returned values, for example: 

      Ray ray = new Ray(new Vector3(0, 12, 0), -Vector3.UnitY);
      Plane planeLow = new Plane(Vector3.UnitY, 1);
      Plane planeHigh = new Plane(Vector3.UnitY, 2);

      float distanceLow;
      float distanceHigh;

      Ray.Intersects(ray, planeLow, out distanceLow);
      Ray.Intersects(ray, planeHigh, out distanceHigh);

this returns 13 for distanceLow and 14 for distanceHigh, while I am expecting values of 11 and 10 respectively. The ray is at Y = 12 facing downwards, the planeLow is facing upwards with a distance of 1 to the origin, which is to me a distance of 11 along the ray where the ray and the plane intersects. When I lower the plane to -1 (so farther away from the ray origin), the value actually decreases to 11 (which I initially expected) instead of increasing to 13.

 

What am I missing? Thanks!

 

Edit: The solution appears to be that I simply just need to flip the D (distance) value of the plane temporarily while doing Intersection calculations, I just don't get why this is how it works, there must be a situation where it makes more sense this way?

Edited by AODBAMF
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your constructor for the plane gives you planes NOT at +1 and +2, but -1 and -2. The second parameter of the constructor is the distance along the normal to the origin. The direction of the normal is important. That is, a plane with the normal facing +y points to the origin at a distance of +1 only if the plane is at y == -1.

 

Change your constructors to (UnitY, -1) and (UnitY, -2) and see if that changes things.

 

EDIT: for clarity, if you want a plane at y = +1, the distance to the origin along the normal = (0,1,0) is -1 (i.e., 1 unit in the negative Y direction). To put it another way, if you travel along the direction of the normal by the signed distance, you will arrive at the origin.

 

I think, perhaps, you assumed the second parameter was the distance from the origin to the plane. The second parameter is, in fact, the distance from the plane to the origin. Again, the direction is important.

Edited by Buckeye
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright thanks, I assumed it was the other way around smile.png

Edited by AODBAMF
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've seen people stumble upon this occasionally. I guess it's implemented this way because the evaluation of a (homogenous) point will now be a 4D dot product, i.e.

vx * nx + vy * ny + vz * nz + vw * d == dot(v, plane)

instead of

vx * nx + vy * ny + vz * nz- vw * d (this is not a dot product)

This makes a plane "shader compatible", e.g. manually clipping in a pixel shader is just:
[tt]
clip(dot(position, plane));
[/tt]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0