• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
gchris6810

Multiple projection matrices

4 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I am creating an application with multiple viewports. I was researching methods as to how I could store multiple projection matrices and all I found was the glPushMatrix and glPopMatrix functions which don't seem to be adequate for what I need (although I may be wrong). Would computing the individual projection matrices each frame give a large performance loss? If so then what method can I use to store and recall them? If I have to use the aforementioned functions then could I please have an example of the implementation. I understand that the projection matrix stack can store a maximum of two matrices on some hardware. How would I circumvent this? Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What version of OpenGL are you using? glPushMatrix and glPopMatrix functions have long since been deprecated and full removed in OpenGL 4.0 and higher.

 

And no, computing a projection matrix for N viewports is not an expensive operation. Computing a projection matrix is essentially one cotangent call and a few multiplies and divides. And you should only need to do this once per viewport per frame. And if you truly suspect you're wasting a lot of time computing projection matrices, then you can go ahead and profile your application and see if that's indeed what is happening.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


and full removed in OpenGL 4.0 and higher.

Only in Core contexts.

 

Regardless, pretty much all OpenGL programs these days manage their own matrices. You generally provide them as uniforms to a shader, which gives you the freedom (and responsibility) to define them any way you like.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even in old-school GL you could store multiple matrices as arrays of 16 floats (each), then glLoadMatrixf them.  Example:

 

float pmatrix0[] = {...};

float pmatrix1[] = {...};

float pmatrix2[] = {...};

 

// some time later

glMatrixMode (GL_PROJECTION);

glLoadMatrixf (pmatrix0);

glMatrixMode (GL_MODELVIEW);

 

// draw some stuff and then:

glMatrixMode (GL_PROJECTION);

glLoadMatrixf (pmatrix1);

glMatrixMode (GL_MODELVIEW);

 

// draw some more stuff, then:

glMatrixMode (GL_PROJECTION);

glLoadMatrixf (pmatrix2);

glMatrixMode (GL_MODELVIEW);

 

Regarding performance, yes, there is going to be some (tiny) overhead from switching any kind of matrix in the scene, but also applies to modelview, texture matrices, etc.  The overhead is honestly going to be so small that you won't even measure it on any performance graph, unless you're doing something flat-out crazy (like switching the matrix per-particle in a particle system).

 

For a practical real-world example, GLQuake switched it's projection matrix twice per-frame and didn't suffer from it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. Seeing as the performance loss is negligible I think I will stick with what I have.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0