• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
cephalo

Question about depth bias.

5 posts in this topic

I recently used the depth bias field in the rasterizer state description to get rid of some z-fighting issues that I had. I drew some stuff, then changed the rasterizer state to a depth bias of -10, then drew other stuff. This eliminated any z fighting perfectly.

 

I have a question though. My next step will involving some more co-planer drawing, and I could simplify some things if I could allow these quads to overlap in places. Does the depth bias apply only to reads of the depth buffer? I'm not sure how to formulate this question... let me express what I want to do.

 

Can I, in the same draw call of many, possibly overlapping instanced quads, ensure that whatever is drawn after, or before, always wins the depth test? I just need one quad or the other to always win. It could be those drawn first or those drawn last. I'm unsure of exactly how the depth bias works.

Edited by cephalo
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I only want things to end up on top if they are co-planar or close enough to co-planar to cause z fighting. Thanks for the answer. That tells me what I need to do. If one wants to benefit from the depth bias setting, one must change the rasterizer state.

Edited by cephalo
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually end up organising my rendering code so that it happens like this:

 

Render Opaque Stuff (environments, characters, etc)

Turn z-write off, z-bias on

Render depth-biased decal stuff (blob shadows/bullet holes, etc)

Turn z-write back on, z-bias off

Render 1-bit transparent stuff (foliage, etc)

Turn z-write off

Render 8-bit transparent stuff (particles, etc)

 

By turning off the z-write while you render your decal stuff, you can stack lots of decals without having to increment the depth bias between each layer.

 

Edit: Also, I almost always z-bias by creating a new projection matrix that has a minutely narrower field of view. I find it tends to succeed better across different platforms.

Edited by C0lumbo
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your co-planar stuff uses the exact same vertices (and the same vertex shader), then there's no need for depth biasing -- just use the depth-test mode of less-than-or-equal and the latest pass will always win, or use equal for every pass after the first one. In this situation, there will never be any z-fighting.

 

If your decal's vertices don't line up perfectly, then yeah, you'll get z-fighting, which you can fix by z-biasing the decal towards the viewer (which modifies the decal's z values that go into the depth-test).

Alternatively you can depth-bias the entire first pass of the scene in the opposite direction, but that's a much less common choice wink.png

 

I prefer the first option because the right depth-bias value to use depends on the distance of the object from the viewer. The z-buffer units aren't evenly distributed (there's more precision near the camera), so a value of "-10" might mean -0.1mm when close to the camera and -1m when far from the camera wacko.png

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0