• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Dynamic Ambient Occlusion

4 posts in this topic



So I'm trying to deepen my GPU knowledge and embarking on rendering a minecraft-style mesh with Dynamic Ambient Occlusion ala this GPU Gems article.



I guess the principle question I have is this:

When you are creating the AO shadow value per-vertex (element) in your mesh, do you then just follow that with a normal render and use normal fragment shader linear interpolation between adjacent vertex shadow values to actually shade the fragments?


i.e. does the process look something like this:

2 passes of the AO algorithm

1 pass of a normal render using a texture map output by the AO algroithm to get shadow values per vertex?


Or am I missing something in the article and you can actually do the screen render within the 2 AO passes?






Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can help you with this, but.. Please don't. Despite being fully aware of the limitations of SSAO, I actually implemented various SSAO variations.

They all had one thing in common: You can't find edges that aren't there, nor can you know one mesh REALLY isn't creating AO with another. It's going to be awful.

On models you usually bake in some fake AO to make them more detailed. On dynamic stuff, including just basic movement, it won't work well.


You have a wonderful opportunity to use your vertex attributes for something useful. Set aside a few 6-8 bytes for lighting.

You can use 4 channels for emissive light, 1 channel for shadows, 1 for AO (it being separated allows you to ramp it), and even brightness (from torches).

If you don't have anything so fancy, just set aside 2 channels: shadows and AO.


Using the classic blanket approach to shadows is going to end up with your caves being in half-shade just like the rest of your shadows. Not to mention, shadows are affected by atmospheric light as well. Easily accounted for in voxel worlds simply by finding the "ground level" in a post-process stage of your terrain.





And why not SSAO:


Edited by Kaptein

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is that article I posted actually SSAO though as opposed to an approximation of true AO? I thought it was the latter, not the former. My understanding is that a lot of SSAO implementations use the depth buffer hack for faster rendering but then you get jenky outcomes. The GPU Gems article, I think, is approximating global AO. Ya? Or am I just wrong on terminology?


Anyway, the AO for minecraft-like worlds is pretty great.


Just from a theoretical learning perspective though if you have the answer to my original question can you provide it?


Thanks :)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct. It is an interesting technique. I don't think it will work too well without some serious work in a minecraftian-style world. Too much stuff.

Definitely interesting though. Some things to consider: You need access to the atmosphere, as well as any nearby lights. You need to be able to efficiently represent vertices are disk-shapes, and I think that means you can't have quads with only 4 vertices.


No idea how well this is going to work out - how scalable it is. But it looks fancy.

Edited by Kaptein

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. so rambling on-wards. My central hangups are still just about implementation. I'm somewhat worried about performance but it's way easier to deal with that after implementation rather than obsessing about it now. Mostly I just want to learn this stuff; secondarily it's a bonus if it looks amazing and runs at framerate...


So here's my thoughts about implementation. Is anything in here either insane or just stupid because I don't know about some awesome GPU trick?


Basically, I think I can generate better results by generating AO data using the actual voxel cube faces, instead of their verts due to the fact that they are cubes and not a smoother mesh. Maybe this is wrong... Feedback appreciated :)


GPU 1 (generate our disks with which we will perform the AO algorithm described in the Gems 2 chapter)
vertex shader (pass-through)
geometry shader
at the center of each face of each block that is facing air
generate one point
generate the appropriate normal
transform feedback -> retrieve the list of points/normals
fragment shader: discard unless there is a way to just get the pipeline to stop after Transform Feedback?
CPU 1 (build the disk lookup data structure)
extracted points/normals go into textures
build out the hierarchical representation data structure within the textures
GPU 2 (First AO pass. Basically, render a single quad with UVs [0..1] to cover the whole data texture)
vertex shader (pass-through)
fragment shader
run AO pass #1 and store accumulated shadow data into a new texture
CPU 2 (here just to pass the texture back to the GPU for the second AO pass)
extract shadow info texture from GPU 2
Is there is a way to run the second GPU pass without coming back out to the CPU? If the texture is already bound from the previous render, I guess it's still in the same place?
GPU 3 (Second AO pass)
render a single quad with UVs [0..1] to cover the whole data texture.
vertex shader (pass-through)
fragment shader
run AO pass #2 and store accumulated shadow data into a shadow info texture
GPU 4 (render the actual scene)
vertex shader
geometry shader
for each cell center
generate the 2 triangles to render
fragment shader
in addition to normal logic, use AO data to shade mesh
because we generated AO data for faces, not verts, blend between up to nearest 4 face values as calculated in GPU 2+3

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
    • By mapra99

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now