• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Martin Winged

OpenGL
WebGL - How to send an array of matrices to the vertex shader?

8 posts in this topic

I want to send an array of matrices (to be more specific: a dynamically changing between draw calls Float32Array of 4x4 Float32Arrays) to a vertex shader with multiple model matrices (size of this.modelMatrices depends on how many objects are moving, so there may be only one model matrix and just in the next frame there may be 30 of them).
 
When I just call:
gl.uniformMatrix4fv(program.mMatrixUniform, false, this.modelMatrices);
where this.modelMatrices is an Float32Array, and program.mMatrixUniform is declared like this:
program.mMatrixUniform = gl.getUniformLocation(program, 'uMMatrix');
it throws:
gl.INVALID_VALUE was caused by call to: uniformMatrix4fv.
 
In OpenGL uniformMatrix4fv there is an additional count attribute, which allows to specify the amount of matrices sent while in WebGL there isn't. Also, the question is, does dynamically changing this.modelMatrices causes a problem too?
 
What is a proper way of doing it in WebGL?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

depends on how many objects are moving, so there may be only one model matrix and just in the next frame there may be 30 of them).

You need to define in shader the static length of the uniform array of matricies, and since that, the array of floats you pass to uniform setting function cannot be shorter than that (but can be longer since some updates). There is also inablitity to specify offset in the array, so it will always fill the uniform from the begining of array (this is so silly its hard to believe, but I just cannot find the offset accepting functions in specs!)

 

But there are more ways to set matricies to shaders, you can simply create a vec4 array, and set that, and use it to construct the matricies or just use them as rows the raw way in shader, doting 4d vectors with them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JohnnyCode

I like the second method, but I'm not sure what would be more computational expensive - creating matrices from an array of vec4 on GPU or sending on each draw call filled Float32Array with let's say 32 matrices? Also I don't need to offset anything since I found a clever way of managing model matrices, so it is not a problem for now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't remember if I succeeded in sending Matrix4 arrays.

My engine is sending Vec4 arrays for now.

The reason behind this is that Transformation matrix can be 3x4 which spare you 1 Vec4 per matrix.

Considering you have a limit of uniforms in the vertex shader, this is mostly welcome!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In your shader code you need to create the array of elements you want to use

uniform mat4[4] uMMatrix;

In reality, webgl just created four seperate uniforms with the names uMMatrix[0], uMMatrix[1], uMMatrix[2],and uMMatrix[3]. You need to bind them seperately.

program.mMatrixUniform[0] = gl.getUniformLocation(program, 'uMMatrix[0]');
gl.uniformMatrix4fv(program.mMatrixUniform[0], false, this.modelMatrices[0]);

There is more discussion on the subject here

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending an array of floats and saving uniform vectors slots sounds more promising to me than sending ready matrices and binding every one of them separately, so I think I'd rather go that way.

 

BTW Is there a way to define size of an array in the vertex shader basing on MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_VECTORS value, so it would be more 'cross-hardware'?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

BTW Is there a way to define size of an array in the vertex shader basing on MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_VECTORS value, so it would be more 'cross-hardware'?

I would like to correct you here that you should establish as many vectors in a compiled shader as you need, not a single bit more.

If amount you expect shrinks or grows it will bogus up your API calls. (no count or offset parameters in webgl specs uniform setters)

 

So establish as many vec4a as you need, not more, and check with gl.getParameter(gl.MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_VECTORS)) to see if the current setup actualy even supports you least needed amount. If the MVUV provided in outer API of yours is smaller than your needs, you need to fallback on your own responsibility and pick lesser shaders - if even.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JohnnyCode

I'm a little bit confused now.

GLSL specification states - "If an array is indexed with an expression that is not an integral constant expression, or if an array is passed as an argument to a function, then its size must be declared before any such use."

 

So unless I'd make a long long if-else ladder (which is strongly dissuaded on older GLSL) which would look like this:

else if (matrixIndex == 1)
	return mat4(rawMatrices[12], rawMatrices[13], ..., rawMatrices[23], 0, 0, 0, 1);
else if (matrixIndex == 2)
	return mat4(rawMatrices[24], rawMatrices[25], ..., rawMatrices[35], 0, 0, 0, 1);
...
else if (matrixIndex == 63)
	return mat4(rawMatrices[756], rawMatrices[757], ..., rawMatrices[767], 0, 0, 0, 1); 

I'm bound to declare it's size first, and because of this I can't really see any advantageous solution which would establish as many floats as I need (because of the fact that the amount of needed floats would dynamically change at the runtime).

Edited by Winged
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

(because of the fact that the amount of needed floats would dynamically change at the runtime).

 

Ah I see what you ment. You want to maximize the array , as much as it can get.

Well if you want to declare an array size of unifrom declaration of a shader to be maximal on a system, you may call gl.getParameter(gl.MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_VECTORS)) and put this value to your shader code string, before you compile it (and also knowinng this value for your very aplication) .

 

Wheather this constant (MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_VECTORS) is available in GLSL code compiler I do not know .

 

But bare in mind that once shader gets compiled, the uniform array keeps its size, so change at the runtime will not be possible unless you recompile, but I do not see why would someone need to change an unifrom array length through runtime? (just fill the unsed rest always,  even bogus,  you cannot specify count in webgl so always pass conforming array of floats)

 

You can index vec4 array with an expresion in vertex shader I am sure.

 

like :

uniform vec4 u_vecs[256];

....

int ind = 6 ; // sixth matrix

mat4 themat=mat4(u_vecs[ind*4],u_vecs[ind*4+1],u_vecs[ind*4+2],u_vecs[ind*4+3]);

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
    • By Tchom
      Hey devs!
       
      I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.
       
      Vertex Shader
      uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
      precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
    • By yahiko00
      Hi,
      Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
      For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
      I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
      I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

      Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
      Any insight would be appreciated
  • Popular Now