• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Kiristu

Vertex shader value is not interpolated in pixel shader

6 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I'm developing a shader that will display parallax occlusion mapping and some other effects. To have it working I need to use normals and tangents.

 

My vertices contain normal information in the NORMAL semantic (am I using correct word here ?) and the tangents are stored in TEXCOORD1.

 

Since the result is not what I expect, I display the normals and tangent values as the output color.

 

When the normals are displayed, I get what I expect: a gradient between various colors representing the normal values.

But when I do exactly the same thing with tangent values, there is not gradient and each face has a constant color (even if faces have different colors).

So it seems like something prevents the interpolation to occur when the tangent values are used.

I send the given values to pixel shader via COLOR1 or TEXCOORD2 and get the same result. I've also tried some other TEXCOORDs and COLORs.

 

The code is something like (copied from my code but without many other things):

struct VS_OUTPUT_DIR
{
	float4 Position : POSITION;
	float2 TexCoord : TEXCOORD0;
	float4 Diffuse : COLOR0;
	float4 specular : COLOR1;
};


VS_OUTPUT_DIR vertexMain(in float4 vPosition  : POSITION,
						 in float3 vNormal    : NORMAL,
						 in float3 Tangent 	  : TEXCOORD1,
						 float2 texCoord      : TEXCOORD0,
						 float4 diffuse		  : COLOR0)
{
	VS_OUTPUT_DIR Output;
...

	Output.specular = float4(Tangent, 1);
	return Output;
}

float4 pixelMain( VS_OUTPUT_DIR IN) : COLOR
{
        ...
	return abs(IN.specular);
}

So any clue of what I could test or check would be very appreciated.

 

Note: I use Intel GPA tools to debug the shaders.

 

Thanks,

K.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are your tangents normalized? What color are you seeing? You could try debugging your C++ code where they are generated to verify the values are what you are expecting (perpendicular to normal, magnitude 1).There is also a semantic you can use specifically for tangents: TANGENT.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tangents are normalized.

The colors are those from the coordinates of the tangents ( (1,1,1) => pure white, (1,0,0) => pure red etc...).

I created a simple model and debugged the computation and it seems to be correct.

 

However, I noticed all the vertices of my simple model (4 vertices) are duplicated because the exporter (B3D from Blender) exports the model face by face, writing all their vertices each time. So my model is now 9 vertices.

 

As you suggested, the tangents computation will be the same for every vertex on a given face, giving this result.

 

Something I did not say is that I'm using the Irrlicht 3D engine and, if the normals are bound to NORMAL semantic, the tangents (for some reason) are put into TEXCOORD1 (not into TANGENT).

 

I guess this makes a difference because even if vertices are duplicated, the normal interpolation still occurs while tangent does not.

 

Well, finally I'm not sure the problem is really with the shader. Having this heavy vertex duplication seems to be the origin of it, and might be also a performance issue.

I would still be interested to (try to) understand why normals are interpolated and texcoord1 is not.

 

Thanks for your help.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for a single triangle, tangent vectors of its vertcies are identical 3d vectors. And if normals on the triangle's vertcies are smooth normals, you would spot a gradient happen between binormal vectors, since binormals are cross product of a (smoothed) normal and tangent.

 

 

 

Since the result is not what I expect, I display the normals and tangent values as the output color.

 

When the normals are displayed, I get what I expect: a gradient between various colors representing the normal values.

But when I do exactly the same thing with tangent values, there is not gradient and each face has a constant color

In case you are not seeing a smooth lighting for your mesh, I would make sure

 normals are smooth normals (what I suspect is true in your case), not the face normals, and if problem prevails, put your attention to computation of the binormal vector.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to UP that topic.

 

I just want to confirm that my problem was with the model itself and the exporter duplicating vertices. I removed duplicated vertices and tangents are correctly interpolated, and my problem is solved.

 

Thanks for your help.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0