• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ynm

Draw many independent objects

2 posts in this topic

Hi everyone,

 

I tried simulating tank track, and it seems the hardest work is drawing many objects (meshes) on screen. The physics is not the problem, e.g just cast several rays. There is other solutions to draw track, but I like drawing detailed track, and making it the main selling point (feature).

 

For example, each tank like US Abrams has about 80 pads, and exactly the same links between track. So each track has about 160 independent objects, and each tank has about 320 objects (detailed meshes), not considering other parts of the tank. For a game with about 16 players, I need 16 x 320 = 5120 objects

 

I used Unity engine, which is limited in many ways. So if I use another engine or write one my own, what is the best method to draw many independent objects like above mentioned? If I need to choose engine, which feature do I need?

 

I imagine something like using GPGPU could solve that, but for old computer, it is not available, and I am don't know for sure will it work or not.

 

Any advice?

 

Regards

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Draw calls and state changes are inherently expensive. Most games take big efforts to minimize draw calls.

You do not draw each link in a tread individually. For a tank tread, you would have animators come up with a small number of animation frames that move the treads (perhaps 6 or 8 or so frames) and use a single mesh. Your entire tank can be combined into a single object that is animated and drawn as single call, or if you cannot design around it, two calls. Not 160 draw calls.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you keep using Unity, and have a budget to spend, check out "Mesh Baker" in the asset store. Helped me with a similar problem, reducing my vehicles 14 individual Meshes to a single skinned mesh. Also it has functionality to bake different UV Textures into a single atlas, which is also something you will have to do.

It is now drawn in a single draw call (or at least with 14x less draw calls), thanks to that I can use more vehicles in the same scene, while still being able to move the parts of the mesh as if they would be individual objects.

 

If you lack the funds for the Mesh Baker, I guess you can get the same effect in any 3D Package like Blender or 3DS Max. Of course, then you need to know yourself how to bake a texture atlas and combine the objects into a skinned mesh, but I guess there are plenty of tutorials on that on the web.

 

 

And I wouldn't hope any engine will solve that problem for you. As frob already hinted at, its more a problem with the underlying abstraction layers like DirectX or OpenGL. So you would need to code to the metal if you wanted to get around draw call limitations (that is why mantle is such a big thing for some people).

 

It is certainly easier to invest more time in preparing your 3D Objects than coding such low level functions yourself.IMO of course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0