• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tmason

Which is faster/better - glClearColor/glClear or glClearBuffer* ?

8 posts in this topic

Hello,

I have a quick question I am curious about.

I am used to using the combination of glClearColor + glClear to clear the color/depth buffers.

However I found another function, glClearBufferfv being one of them, which performs the exact same thing.

So I am curious to learn which practice is "better" or which should be used.

Is it just a stylistic difference or would there be a performance penalty, etc. on using one versus the other?

Thank you for your time!      

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey !

 

glClear/glClearColor resets the (bound/unbound) buffers to their preset value.

 

glClearBuffer resets the currentlly bound Buffer to a value you like 

 

so if your scene has dynamic changing buffers i would stick to glClearBuffer. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

glClearCOlor  does not clear anything

 

 

The glClearColor function specifies the red, green, blue, and alpha values used by glClear to clear the color buffers. Values specified by glClearColor are clamped to the range [0,1].

 

https://www.opengl.org/sdk/docs/man/html/glClearColor.xhtml

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd318377(v=vs.85).aspx

 

I understand the glClearColor itself doesn't clear anything; in my original post I specify glClearColor + glClear because I know you essentially use glClearColor to set the color and glClear to perform the actual clearing.

 

That may not be the most technical explaination but in theory that is what happens.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey !

 

glClear/glClearColor resets the (bound/unbound) buffers to their preset value.

 

glClearBuffer resets the currentlly bound Buffer to a value you like 

 

so if your scene has dynamic changing buffers i would stick to glClearBuffer. 

 

OK, so it seems like functionally they are identical but is there a difference in speed? In theory it seems like glClear is faster because you are only clearing and not setting any values.

 

I was searching around and I found this post: http://www.gamedev.net/topic/646400-speed-up-glclearbuffer/

 

I just wanted to know what others' real world experience was (as well as get opinions from those more experienced than myself).

 

Thanks again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory it seems like glClear is faster because you are only clearing and not setting any values

You are setting values - clearing a buffer just means setting each pixel to a pre-defined value.
 
In particular, you are setting the buffer to the values provided to [tt]glClearColor(...)[/tt] for [tt]GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT[/tt], and the value provided to [tt]glClearDepth(...)[/tt] for [tt]GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT[/tt] (and so on for other buffer types).

I was searching around and I found this post: http://www.gamedev.net/topic/646400-speed-up-glclearbuffer/

I'd take that topic with a liberal pinch of salt. It's not clear whether the measurements were accurate (glFinish is not a good way to take GPU-side timings), nor whether the operations as specified were actually equivalent. Edited by swiftcoder
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In theory it seems like glClear is faster because you are only clearing and not setting any values

You are setting values - clearing a buffer just means setting each pixel to a pre-defined value.
 
In particular, you are setting the buffer to the values provided to [tt]glClearColor(...)[/tt] for [tt]GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT[/tt], and the value provided to [tt]glClearDepth(...)[/tt] for [tt]GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT[/tt] (and so on for other buffer types).

I was searching around and I found this post: http://www.gamedev.net/topic/646400-speed-up-glclearbuffer/

I'd take that topic with a liberal pinch of salt. It's not clear whether the measurements were accurate (glFinish is not a good way to take GPU-side timings), nor whether the operations as specified were actually equivalent.

 

 

Thank you; so essentially they are functionally and performance wise identical, correct?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you; so essentially they are functionally and performance wise identical, correct?

They are not strictly speaking equivalent. As far as I can tell, glClearBuffer is intended for clearing framebuffer attachments, and the fact that it can be used to clear the backbuffer is just a side-effect of the standard's use of framebuffer 0 as the backbuffer.

 

In general, I doubt there's enough difference in the backbuffer case to warrant not just sticking to glClear.

 

If you are dealing with framebuffer attachments, then glClearBuffer gives you the additional ability to only clear specific attachments (which you can't do using glClear).

 

And if you really want to get into the ins and outs of performance here, you should benchmark both of these methods against ARB_clear_texture.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you; so essentially they are functionally and performance wise identical, correct?

They are not strictly speaking equivalent. As far as I can tell, glClearBuffer is intended for clearing framebuffer attachments, and the fact that it can be used to clear the backbuffer is just a side-effect of the standard's use of framebuffer 0 as the backbuffer.

 

In general, I doubt there's enough difference in the backbuffer case to warrant not just sticking to glClear.

 

If you are dealing with framebuffer attachments, then glClearBuffer gives you the additional ability to only clear specific attachments (which you can't do using glClear).

 

And if you really want to get into the ins and outs of performance here, you should benchmark both of these methods against ARB_clear_texture.

 

 

Thanks again for the in-depth response; I'll do a benchmark.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0