Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Butabee

Roguelike / NetHack Clone

This topic is 1425 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

So I'm working on a somewhat roguelike game, with infinite procedural maps, while making it multiplayer for up to 4 players, and it will also have an online leaderbord. I'm drawing most things I want to put into the game from games like NetHack. As a more action based version, I'm wondering what people would like to see in a game like this? The main features I have atm are infinite procedural maps, along with infinite item and level progression. The main goal of the game is to climb the leaderboard. So what do you like/dislike about roguelikes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

one question that is kind of offtopic: how will you handle the multiplayer part as most roguelikes are turn based?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The game I have in mind will be action based. One of the key areas I'm doing differently, but will have some abilities on a cooldown, like trap search, and such.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I dislike about roguelikes would mainly be the lack of nice art, the lack of story, and the permadeath with no game+ feature.  The only roguelike I really like is Azure Dreams (PS1) because it had nice art, a home base town to level up, and when you died in the dungeon you just ended up in the home base with no loot, you didn't have to utterly start over.  There was even an actual end to the story. wub.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, my game isn't doing much in the graphics department, it has pixel art around nes/atari resolution but with more colors and hopefully, they're more readable and attractive. I think I remember you saying you don't like pixel art, but I love it and high quality 3D models are out of my ability.


I'd like to have something like a procedural quest generator, but something like that might have to wait for after release.


I like having a little direction also.


I don't really like perma death either, I don't think I'll have it in, but I would like to have a death penalty. I don't know about losing loot since in my game you won't be able to carry a lot. For gear you only have whatever is equipped, and have to make a choice to pickup a gear piece and leave the other behind or not, of the same slot. I could have experience loss or something.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that I dislike pixel art, you have a good memory.  I don't have any problem with 2D art, but it has to be fairly high-res, whether vector or anime raster or what.  But, I'm not a fan of roguelikes in general, so it probably doesn't actually matter what I like.  One thing though, have you played Rogue Legacy?  I've gotten 3 recommendations that I should play that in the past year alone, so it's probably something worth looking into in the field of rogue-likes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really play roguelikes, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt: some of the following may be less issues in roguelikes than a mismatch between what roguelikes offer and what I enjoy. That said:

 

The main thing that I dislike in roguelikes, I think, is the repetition: that the game seems to be built around the idea that the player will go through the various dungeons over and over again. For me, that can get rather boring, even if the levels are randomly generated.

 

I'm also not a fan of being at the mercy of the game's random number generator: I don't want the success of a run to depend on whether or not I get good loot, or whether I roll well on my attacks. Building on that, I really don't like combat that's based heavily on random numbers: I really, really don't like being told that I missed simply because the random number generator said so.

 

One point that isn't my own, but that might be worth repeating, is something that I recall TotalBiscuit bringing up in some of his reviews: roguelikes tend to have rather shallow combat mechanics, and on top of that tend to provide static bonuses far more than active abilities (the latter of which tend to provide more decisions for the player by providing more versatility).

 

In fact, it might be worth going to TotalBiscuit's channel and looking up reviews of some recent roguelikes and rogue-lites: I seem to recall that he gives a fair bit of detail in his thoughts on a given game. Risk of Rain in particular (if I'm remembering the right game) might be a good one to look at, since I think that I recall that he quite liked that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that I dislike pixel art, you have a good memory.  I don't have any problem with 2D art, but it has to be fairly high-res, whether vector or anime raster or what.  But, I'm not a fan of roguelikes in general, so it probably doesn't actually matter what I like.  One thing though, have you played Rogue Legacy?  I've gotten 3 recommendations that I should play that in the past year alone, so it's probably something worth looking into in the field of rogue-likes.

I like 2D Vector art too, but Unity doesn't support it natively, and I'm not really up to learning some third party plugin atm, and plus, I've been slaving away today on some animations :P

 

I might check out Rogue Legacy, I've seen it on steam but havn't been too inclined to get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really play roguelikes, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt: some of the following may be less issues in roguelikes than a mismatch between what roguelikes offer and what I enjoy. That said:

 

The main thing that I dislike in roguelikes, I think, is the repetition: that the game seems to be built around the idea that the player will go through the various dungeons over and over again. For me, that can get rather boring, even if the levels are randomly generated.

 

I'm also not a fan of being at the mercy of the game's random number generator: I don't want the success of a run to depend on whether or not I get good loot, or whether I roll well on my attacks. Building on that, I really don't like combat that's based heavily on random numbers: I really, really don't like being told that I missed simply because the random number generator said so.

 

One point that isn't my own, but that might be worth repeating, is something that I recall TotalBiscuit bringing up in some of his reviews: roguelikes tend to have rather shallow combat mechanics, and on top of that tend to provide static bonuses far more than active abilities (the latter of which tend to provide more decisions for the player by providing more versatility).

 

In fact, it might be worth going to TotalBiscuit's channel and looking up reviews of some recent roguelikes and rogue-lites: I seem to recall that he gives a fair bit of detail in his thoughts on a given game. Risk of Rain in particular (if I'm remembering the right game) might be a good one to look at, since I think that I recall that he quite liked that one.

I like having some luck involved gameplay, but I think the trick is finding the right balance of it. Like if you get a bad roll, you have increased chance of a good roll for the next one or two.

 

I agree that a succession of misses or fails is frusterating though, enough to make a rare string of good rolls to not be enough to balance it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As long as, it isn't too much luck and involve less player's decision.

Sword of the Stars: The Pit is the good simple of what I think it's bad, everything in game is pretty much luck based, all guns, no ammo or all health, no weapons. Ranged weapon is distance-based not direction-based, so if go into room filled with gun, you're pretty much dead, especially one of them can incapacitate you for very long turn.

My favourite one is One Way Heroics, that's quite balance in player's decision and randomness.

So, I think it should be player's fault instead of pure luck decided you should fail, also there should be at least minimum object for something, or at least something will drop.

And what if player died in multilayer? can they be revive or they just sit and watch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!