Sign in to follow this  
Orymus3

Unity 2D or 3D physics for a top-down 2D ARPG in Unity?

Recommended Posts

Orymus3    18822

Hi,

 

I'm currently setuping my project in Unity. It will be a 2D action RPG.

Though all of the visual will be 2D sprites, I'm concerned that I want to implement features such as jumping over certain obstacles, have some bridges pass over the floor at different heights, and it currently feels like using 3D physics behind the scenes would be much simpler, despite the game being entirely 2D from a visual standpoint.

 

Anyone here tried doing anything a top-down game in Unity? What did you use and why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oolala    1102

You can use 2D graphics to emulate 3D objects, but it's really not going to work out for you if you're trying to use 2D physics to emulate 3D physics.  Sounds like you already know the answer to your question.

 

That, and unless you're going crazy with the number of objects that interact with one another, the performance gap between 2D physics simulation and 3D physics simulation isn't big enough to justify shooting yourself in the foot over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Orymus3    18822

So, you assessment is that, regardless of the actual visual output (2d in this case), dropping the Z axis is not a sufficient performance-gainer to justify limiting myself.

That being said, it does come with an added complexity that I need to handle to process collisions.

 

I just feel choosing 3d for a 2d game feels like refusing to use a set of tools optimized for most of what I'm trying to do save for a few things, so I end up handling everything in a 'custom' way because of the few situations that would benefit from that support...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patrick B    210

I'm by no means an expert in Unity so I'd like to recommend a little sodium chloride with this reply, but in my experience using 3D graphics for a top-down or side-scrolling (parallax) 2D game is unlikely to affect performance much. In fact, the effect would probably be an improvement. Here's my reasoning:

 

In any robust game engine or environment, graphics are usually mixed along alpha channels (etc.) during game play -- characters & obstacles layered on a separate background, etc. In 3D, this is complicated with the addition of a Z axis which requires additional depth management including clipping, occlusion, and so on.

 

At the same time, any 3D engine worth a spit will be efficient, meaning it will not waste too many cycles trying to figure out things like clipping when the graphics blocks are basically just flat planes perpendicular to the Z axis. In effect, the game is simply shifting around postcards on which you probably don't want to apply lighting effects, meaning much of the complexity of a full 3D environment is reduced.

 

Additionally, 3D engines tend to boast their polygon rendering abilities so you know roughly what kind of performance you're likely to get. And beyond this, 3D engines often make direct use of graphics hardware which can greatly increase both rendering speed and free up the main processor for other functions (handling A.I., collision detection, etc.) 2D engines usually use the main computer/device processor so they can boast greater compatibility, but at the cost of raw power and speed.

 

In Adobe Flash, for example, we have had robust 2D graphics since pretty much the inception. Many optimizations have been made to the software to make it efficient, and it was pretty darned good until Adobe introduced direct GPU support. As a result, frameworks like Starling popped up that boasted the same capabilities as Flash 2D but with the ability to handle a lot more while simultaneously freeing up the CPU. In other words, Starling is a 2D game engine that uses Flash's newer 3D capabilities, analogous to your question. The answer that Starling provides is quite clear: 2D games can realize significant performance enhancements (plus easier code/effects), by using a 3D engine.

 

Back to Unity, I'm fairly certain that the same GPU acceleration is used which would lead me to believe that you would be better off using the full 3D engine to create a 2D game; the performance improvements alone would be worth it. Also, as you mentioned, 3D engines tend to have a lot of functionality pre-built -- physics, collisions, etc. It's nice to know how these work but if you're more concerned with actually building the game, these topics are probably best saved until later.

 

My two cents smile.png

Edited by Patrick B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Orymus3    18822

Thanks, but I think my concern doesn't really lie with performance, but rather, ease of use for game logic (handling collisions, etc.).

Assuming I want to have stuff like jumping and overpass bridges/mezzanines, I felt 3D makes it easier to handle, but that would also mean I need to attach 3d collision boxes to actual 2d sprites, which feels a bit counter-intuitive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DiegoSLTS    2113

Try both, there's no wrong one.

 

Really, you're using Unity, it's really easy to try both approaches, you don't even need to remove one to create the other, just disable the 2D or 3D collision components and enable the others, you don't even have to replace code since each 3D collision callbacks has a different name in 2D (OnTriggerEnter and OnTriggerEnter2D, etc). Setup some test scenes with the things you have in mind (jumping over enemies, different heights, etc) and try them if you're not sure.

 

Anyway, for a 2D game I think I would go with 2D collision detection and use the z axis values or some flags to check if the collision should be considered or not, it doesn't look like too extra work and maybe you can prevent weird bugs related to the 3D collision volume that you wouldn't notice in a 2D view. Also, 3D and 2D physics use a different axis for gravity and that could lead to more weird bugs, so that's another reason I'll do it in 2D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Orymus3    18822


ust disable the 2D or 3D collision components

 

Wouldn't my code still run actual vector2D vs Vector3D ?

I'd still need to change the code to switch between the two, no?

 


Anyway, for a 2D game I think I would go with 2D collision detection and use the z axis values or some flags to check if the collision should be considered or not, it doesn't look like too extra work and maybe you can prevent weird bugs related to the 3D collision volume that you wouldn't notice in a 2D view. Also, 3D and 2D physics use a different axis for gravity and that could lead to more weird bugs, so that's another reason I'll do it in 2D.

Makes sense. I was going to do something along these lines in 2D.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DiegoSLTS    2113

 


ust disable the 2D or 3D collision components

 

Wouldn't my code still run actual vector2D vs Vector3D ?

I'd still need to change the code to switch between the two, no?

Even in 2D, Unity puts everything in a 3D world, so the game objects would have a position with x, y and z values in both cases (Vector3). You'll always see the 3 components in the editor, and if you change your scene view from 2D to 3D you'll see that the z value is being used.

 

Also, you can have one script that handles 2D collision and another that handles 3D collision so you don't need to change code, just enable/disable those too depending on what you're testing, and then call methods of another script that does the logic you want for a collision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Orymus3    18822


Also, you can have one script that handles 2D collision and another that handles 3D collision so you don't need to change code, just enable/disable those too depending on what you're testing, and then call methods of another script that does the logic you want for a collision.

 

Ok yes, that's what I meant. 

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dissid    172

Use 3d physics. 2d physics in Unity are more catered towards sidescrollers, for example gravity is either x or y axis so you would have to use kinematic rigidbodies and handle jumping yourself. Methods like transform.LookAt() don't work out of the box. etc. I made couple of top down prototypes a while ago, in the end I switched to 3d physics. The performance gain with 2d was so marginal it was not worth it even on mobile.

 

Also, there are things not available with 2d physics, like particle collision detection.

 

 

 

Thanks, but I think my concern doesn't really lie with performance, but rather, ease of use for game logic (handling collisions, etc.).

Assuming I want to have stuff like jumping and overpass bridges/mezzanines, I felt 3D makes it easier to handle, but that would also mean I need to attach 3d collision boxes to actual 2d sprites, which feels a bit counter-intuitive?

 

Forgot to mention that 3d physics with sprites felt a lot more comfortable to me, as you can give volume to the colliders.

Edited by dissid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Similar Content

    • By Spronx
      Hi guys,
      I'm Andy from StriX Interactive and we are
      LOOKING FOR A LEVEL DESIGNER
      to join us on this incredible adventure of developing Blood Oath. Open world fantasy 3rd person RPG in the style of The Witcher.
      We plan to launch a Kickstarter campaign by the end of the year. So it's not a paid job yet.
      We need someone capable of making terrain according to the world map that we have and over all level design. We have a great team and want YOU to be a part of it.
      Contact us on our facebook page https://www.facebook.com/StriXInteractive/

    • By Java Nigga
      Hi there!
      We are JN Studios, we are looking for people to work with us in our project.
      About US:
      JN Studios is a 2 people amateur studio. we have like 1 year making games, but this is our first professional project to show it to the public. We are a programmer guy(Me) and a 3d modeller.
      About the game:
      Strategist Sniper is a RPG/FPS game, yes RPG and fps :v you awake in the middle of the unknown and a small voice tells you that you have to go through the world killing other snipers to get out of there. the mechanics of the game are based on the basic controls of games like League of Legends and in FPS games like Counter Strike.
      What we are looking for?
      actually we are looking for another c# programmer, a musician and an artist(for game illustrations for the marketing of the game).
      Profits Share:
      when the game is in a stable alpha phase we will create a campaign in Idiegogo to obtain money to finance the game. each of the project participants will receive a percentage depending on the work done.
      How to apply?
      just send us a email with a portfolio and in what you can help our team -       trabajojava1@gmail.com


      Devblog1.mp4
    • By cursetalegame
      Hello! I am building the main scene in Unity for a 3D cards game. My goal is creating "card slots" to place the different cards from a deck and use it as "buttons". The image below represents somehow what I want to develop. I have been reading and I think that I have to generate a canvas and place in my scene the slots where I want to place the cards, but I am not sure about it. Also, to use the cards, I don't know if setting buttons is the best option (maybe I should use images instead).
      All recommendations and tips are welcome

    • By cursetalegame
      Hi! We are looking for a unity 3D developer to join our small "beginners" team. We are 3 artists (illustration, concept and 3D modeling), 2 designers and 1 programmer (me). We are developing an online video game that we have already designed. Our goal is to create a small studio and build up this game to take it to video game events around Europe and try to find publishers. Also we want to learn step by step how to develop games, so, is better if you don't have a huge experience in developing
      For more information, or any question, you can send us an email to cursetalegame@gmail.com 
      Cheers
    • By ilovegames
      The legendary UAZ SUV is off in an unprecedented expedition on the picturesque,
      yet rugged regions of Russia. Powerful domestic cross-country vehicles have to go through many trials in the expanses of the country! There are three game modes (Exploring the world, Delivery and Checkpoints).
      Explore the vastness of Russia, perform tasks, and feel the power of the legendary UAZ!

      Features:
      - Large Map.
      - Diverse terrain (mountains, villages, fields, etc.)
      - Modern graphics and effects.
      - Pleasant music.
      - 11 types of camera views.
      - Different weather conditions (fog, rain, etc.)
      - Game modes (Free Driving, Delivery & Checkpoints)
      - 3 models of the legendary brand.
      - And much more!
      Download https://falcoware.com/UazOffRoadNewHorizon.php




  • Popular Now