hello

i want to implement the trancparency in motion blur effect, i want to use for this purpose only the render states : BlendFactor ,DestinationBlend = Blend.InvBlendFactor and SourceBlend = Blend.BlendFactor, how can i do that?

Can you be more specific about the effect you want to achieve?

You can motion blur anything you want as a post process without too terrible overhead, but it will also appear to blur the stuff behind the moving transparent object, and that might not be what you want.

Otherwise, you'll need to use two different buffers to store your velocity information to apply motion blur to the scene and to all of your transparent items accumulated in another buffer, and then put them together.

That seems like it might be a bit heavy.

Are you sure a frame bleed won't suit your purposes? That's kind of like a cheap motion blur, and it will work on everything in your scene.

If not, then you can also do it with the texture and geometry itself, although it will increase the complexity of whatever you're blurring because you'll have to draw it twice (once opaque, once stretched in the direction of movement and partially transparent), and I'm not sure that looks great either.

There may be other methods too, but I'd have to know what you need it for.

EDIT: Your attachment didn't load for me before, but I'm not really sure what I'm looking at here. So you're using an alpha'd model on top of your other model to approximate motion blur with extra geometry?

i need a simple technique using trancparency decreasing

if you taken a look at my motion blur in the image, i have used that that technique but i did'nt love it

if you have a simple shader (verry verry simple) that describes the basics of a motion blur without errors when i convert it, please give it to me.

my image describe my scene with motion blut applied only to the sphere,

ya i have use the alpha blending technique , but i want a simple shader & a COMPLETE shader please,

i need a simple technique using trancparency decreasing

if you taken a look at my motion blur in the image, i have used that that technique but i did'nt love it

if you have a simple shader (verry verry simple) that describes the basics of a motion blur without errors when i convert it, please give it to me.

Thanks, I understand now.

Well, the method works more or less, but it never looks great in my opinion. Somebody else may have a counter-example of it done well, but I'm not familiar with anything real time.

I think you should probably go for a post-process motion blur.

That means rendering a buffer for velocity to use to apply a kind of blurring effect to the image.

What kind of physics system are you using?

You should be able to get the velocity for each of your vertices, and interpolate those to get each pixel, and create a velocity buffer from that. Think X Y Z = R G B, kind of like a normal map. 127 is stationary (relative to that axis).

Then just blur according to your buffer.

It's still not perfect, but the effects are pretty good.

GPU Gems has another method here, which seems to be better/more clever: http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems3/gpugems3_ch27.html

It's a little heavy for me, though.

http://john-chapman-graphics.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/per-object-motion-blur.html This might help.

If anybody can help explain exactly how those velocity buffers are created, that would help a lot.

As it stands, I need to do more research on that topic.

ok, thank's for your intention & intersting with me? but the problem is i use C# + managed directX.

I think that what the original poster really wants is a mechanism for just drawing the sphere a few times to blur it.

Yes, the trouble is that doesn't look very good.

If he's looking for a really simple (but slow) method, just blend together five or six frames (evenly) before displaying it (not frame bleed). That looks good.

Frame bleed is the next best thing, although it doesn't look awesome.

What he's doing is more or less comparable in appearance to frame bleed, just more complicated and expensive.

If you want it to be fast and look good, post-process is your only real option (until somebody comes up with something better).

I think you have that backwards. The fully opaque one should be drawn first, with the transparent ones on top of it. This is because you need the transparent overlay on the opaque sphere to create the appearance of it blurring.

i have used 21 frames & the traslation is from -0.2 to +0.2 (reference is 0) in the X axis