• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL opengl normal mapped objects alongside non-normal mapped objects

This topic is 1180 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

Relatively vague question here:

 

So, I've been toying around with normal mapping and am able to correctly render normal mapped objects in their own little program. However, when I try to implement this into another project, one that also has objects that don't use normal maps, the normal mapped objects don't render at all. The object is there, it just is rendered invisible/transparent. I don't receive any error at all, and am a little stumped where to begin debugging. After some brunt debugging attempts like rendering only the normal mapped object, and not calling the render function for the other objects (still has the same outcome) I'm beginning to wonder if I'm going wrong with the VAO when loading the objects. This is just a guess though. 

 

I've not posted any code here because even a simplified version would require two sets of building, rendering, and shading processes, since I'm really uncertain where I'm going wrong. If certain snippets would help, please let me know and I'll be happy to post them.

 

Anyhow, I was curious if anyone would know offhand why this may be a problem or has dealt with something similar. Should I be using separate VAOs, should I be clearing it between render calls or something along those lines? Does this perhaps have nothing to do with my VAO?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

So my post is similarly vague ...

 

How do you use the VAOs/VBOs? From the OP I assume that you generate 1 VAO, bind it, and let it alone forever. Then all handling of VBOs is to be done "manually" whenever a draw call is prepared, inclusive enabling/disabling of vertex attributes. Anyway, the entire relevant draw state should be specified with each (sub-)mesh to render, so that your low-level layer of rendering is able to compare what is needed with the current set-up (i.e. there is no rely on some draw state being set or being cleared). So (especially w.r.t. your case) switching VBOs and enabling/disabling the vertex attributes is done on a per mesh basis. If, on the hand, you use one VAO per VBO constellation, e.g. one for normal mapped and one for not normal mapped objects, things are not really different except that the draw state then is given with less parameters: It specifies the entire vertex assembly state by a single reference instead of a bunch of parameters.

 

How have you detected that "The object is there, it just is rendered invisible/transparent"? I meant, there is a difference between "no pixel is rastered", "all rastered pixels are discarded", and "the pixels are alpha blended with an alpha of zero". In all cases the objects is not on the screen, but the reasons are very different. For example, what happens if you take the normal mapping fragment shader and short-circuit all computations but simply put out a constant color with alpha 1? What happens if you short-circuit computations of the normals in the vertex shader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply. And no worries about a vague answer, especially since I didn't post any details, that's mostly what I was looking for anyhow (and you're still rather specific smile.png).

 

And, I should have been clearer with my comment "The object is there, it just is rendered invisible/transparent". Also, now when looking into this, I'm a little more confused. To explain, where the object ought to be rendered, there's a transparent hole in the game world in the shape of the object (you can see through the ground, characters, etc). However, it occurs to me now, the odd thing is that you see all the way to the skybox,..which confuses me as there is no difference I can see between the skybox and the ground, rendering-wise, so I'm not sure why that still shows behind, and not just the glClear color . The order of rendering the objects doesn't affect this.

 

It's probably important to note here, that I'm only outputting a vec3 for color in the normal-mapped object's shader, and not tinkering with the alpha. Whereas the other object's shader I do output a vec4 with the alpha value.

 

And, upon a little further investigation, the difference with the skybox and the skybox's shader, is that, unlike the other objects, I'm not using a texture array for it. 

 

It's rather late for me, but I'll try to pin things down more accurately tomorrow by using your suggestions with the shader's normal values. I have a few more ideas now, I'll test out to try to pin this down a little closer.

 

Thanks for the help Haegarr. If I still can't sort things out, I'll go ahead and post the whole shebang here (in a simplified form, of course). I realize it can be frustrating for anyone to help without seeing the code.

 

**Edit**

Alright, I toyed with things a little this morning, and it looks like it's probably a trivial error somewhere. In my simple program, I'm easily able to render an object with a normal map alongside an object without and they both display fine. My method is the exact same as my larger project, as far as I can tell, but obviously I'm making a small mistake somewhere. But, it shouldn't be in the way that I'm doing things. So, somewhere in my larger program I'm doing something that is resulting in the transparent object.

 

I'm kind of back to where I started, but at least I've ruled out that it's something to do with my method of rendering things. I'm still totally open to ideas though, as I would like to integrate normal mapping into my larger project, and I'm still at a bit of a loss where to look for the mistake (it's rather a large project, for me at least). I'll likely just start going through things with a fine toothed comb. But, first some food and family. Happy Thanksgiving all!

Edited by Misantes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, to update a little. I did test the shader to output an alpha value of 1.0f, as well as testing it to simply output a vec4(1,1,1,1), both to the same effect as before.

I should also correct my earlier statement about the render order not affecting things. If the objects are rendered after the normal mapped object, that is when they give the transparent "hole" appearance. But, if the normal mapped object is rendered first, then there's no visual indication that the object is rendered at all. 

 

An interesting development though:

I'm not sure if I'm "short circuiting" the vertex shader correctly, as I'm not 100% certain how to go about that. The vertex shader  transposes the vertex tangent, bitangent and normal in cameraspace and then multiplies that by the light direction. I've tried various inputs and outputs and none effectively change the outcome. However, I've cut out the normal calculations entirely and simply output the light direction tangents without multiplying them by the tangents/bitangents and normals (so, effectively just passing the light direction through the vertex shader) and interestingly, this makes the normal mapped object render at the location of the object rendered before it, and with the previous object's fragment shader. So...that confuses the hell out of me. Just to note, this happens whether I call glDisableVertexAttribArray() on the previous object's arrays or not. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement