# OpenGL Transform feedback and offsets?

## Recommended Posts

I'm currently working with transform feedback in OpenGL 3.3 and I'm having some trouble with the output varyings.

I have a few output variables that need to be quadrupled. Since I currently have roughly around 7, which may go up more, I'm worried that I will come close to maxing out. My max is 64 according to the value I get back from GL_MAX_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_INTERLEAVED_COMPONENTS .

In my current setup, I can get back data BUT
I need to skip over some spots when I write to the output buffer in order to read from it properly.

With my current l VBO, my data is setup to look like:
//VBO layout
POS0 , VELO0 , POS1 , VELO1 , POS2 , VELO2 , POS3 , VELO3 | POS4 , VELO4 , POS5 , VELO5 ....

//Actual data inside
320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0, 320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0, 320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0, 320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0 | 100.0, 100.0, 1.0, 1.0,....

When the transform feedback is activated and it is done writing to my buffer, I get the following output
//Actual data after transform feedback has run once; The position2OUT and position3OUT are written over the wrong spots in the buffer
320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0, 320.0, 250.0, 320, 250.0, 320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0, 320.0, 250.0, 1.0, 1.0 | 100.0, 100.0, 1.0, 1.0,....

It literally writes the data back how they are setup. Messing up the layout of the VBO originally created
Varying setup:
const GLchar *varyings[5];
varyings[0] = "position0OUT";
varyings[1] = "velocityOUT";
varyings[2] = "position1OUT";
varyings[3] = "position2OUT";
varyings[4] = "position3OUT";


Is there a way to setup an offset of some kind for output varyings?
So that my position1OUT, position2OUT, and position3OUT will be written to their correct spots?

The only other thing I can think of is just to write junk data to the buffer using an out array variable and getting it to work with the
transfomm feedback. Giving me more output varyings in the bank to use, at least I think this will happen

I was trying something like in my shader:
#version 330 core

in vec2 positionIN;
in vec2 velocityIN;

out vec2 positionOUT[4];
out vec2 velocityOUT[4];

void main()
{
positionOUT[0] = positionIN;
/* other setting code */
}

But I get errors when compiling. It complains that I 'cannot convert in 2-component vector of float to 2-component vector of float'.
So I'm not sure if the syntax is wrong or I really can't do that Edited by noodleBowl

##### Share on other sites

Transform feedback doesn't perform magic, its doing exactly what you tell it to do. If you don't want all the input vertices written to the transform feedback buffer, then don't write them.

##### Share on other sites

Transform feedback doesn't perform magic, its doing exactly what you tell it to do. If you don't want all the input vertices written to the transform feedback buffer, then don't write them.

I was afraid of this :(
Don't get me wrong, I need to write 4 position values and only 1 velocity value per 4 positions

I was hoping that I would not have to declare velocityOUT1, velocityOUT2, velocityOUT3 in the feedback because it is redudant and also I dont want to get to close to the max varying amount. Thats why having the out attributes as array would work (assuming they don't count against me) or even better would be doing an offset.

If was possible to have everything the way it is in my VBO and then read each position as its own vertex. Skipping over the velocity attributes since there is only one then that would work too

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
628345
• Total Posts
2982191
• ### Similar Content

• Hi all,

I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?

• Hi, New here.
I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc....
I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn?
How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want?
Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn.
So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started.
Thanks,
Dejay Hextrix
• By mellinoe
Hi all,
First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
• By aejt
I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
I have these classes:
For GPU resources:
Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).
And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
Factory classes for resources:
For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
Factory classes for assets:
Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).

Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
Thanks!
• By nedondev
I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
Thanks.

• 9
• 24
• 10
• 9
• 13