# OpenGL [Design Hiccup] Particles and Transform feedback

This topic is 1126 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

I am currently trying to finish up my particle system. The core of it is built, but I keep running into a major hiccup!

For my system I am targeting OpenGL 3.3 and using transform feedback in order to create a State Particle System.

Each of my particles in this current point in time have the following attributes: Current Position, Deviation from the Starting Position, Velocity, Starting Velocity, Acceleration, Current Lifetime, and Lifespan (starting lifetime). In addition to this, each particle is to be represented as a quad and have texture coords for their image.

My hiccup or major block comes in with the transform feedback and the output varyings.

In my particle update area, my transform feedback is using GL_POINTS to iterate over each particle where it outputs the new velocity, acceleration, etc. The major drawback/part in this update is that one run of GL_POINTS (one particle update) will output 4 positions (one for each corner of a quad). I do this to prevent floating point discrepancies between the positions, since they should be all the same and a single difference means I get a graphics glitch. After everything is said and done my VBO ends up looking like:

//All particle data is stored in the same buffer
//Particle1                                                                 //Particle2
[Position1, Position2, Position3, Position4, Velocity...][Position1, Position2, Position3, Position4, Velocity...]


My mega block / kicker

My hiccup comes in right here. While I can update the buffer above perfectly, the other major thing I need to do is read it for rendering.

This is the part I cannot seem to get down. Due to the VBO's data and its makeup, my shader cannot properly read in the data. It gets confused and ends up using a Velocity, Acceleration, etc as a position causing my particles to get rendered incorrectly

I thought about just having extra dummy data in my VBO, so that my Vertex Pointers would see my VBO data correctly.

Basically I decided to pad the attributes other than position:

//All particle data is stored in the same buffer
//Particle1                                                                                                                                                         //Particle2
[Position1, Position2, Position3, Position4, Velocity, DummyVelocity1, DummyVelocity2, DummyVelocity3...][Position1, Position2, Position3...


But I get left hooked by my transform feedback, since output varyings can only write the exact way they are configured and have no ability to offset or skip certain blocks of data. My attributes run over each other when updating, making me run into the same problem above.

I thought to combat this I could just write more/double up on my output varyings. But I get right hooked by the GL_MAX_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_INTERLEAVED_COMPONENTS limit as I easily am already close to the maximum.

Once I start using texture coords or even if I decide my particles need another attribute I will go over the max. Making this solution a no go

Now, I'm left kind of in the dark as to what to do. I thought about doing a double update pass, where I run though my "non render attributes" and update them, outputing the results to a VBO. Then running a secondary update, using results from the first update to update each particle's position and the output from this update would go to a third buffer and get used in the render. Something like:


//First pass: updating the velocity, acceleration, etc. Uses its own varyings
glBindBufferBase(GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER, 0, nonRenderVBO);
glBeginTransformFeedback(GL_POINTS);
glDrawArrays(GL_POINTS, 0, particleCount);
glEndTransformFeedback();

//Second pass: updating the positions. Uses its own varyings
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nonRenderVBO);
glBindBufferBase(GL_TRANSFORM_FEEDBACK_BUFFER, 0, positionVBO);
glBeginTransformFeedback(GL_POINTS);
glDrawArrays(GL_POINTS, 0, particleCount);
glEndTransformFeedback();

/*Later on: use the positionVBO in my render method*/



BUT I feel like this is a very horrible idea / poor solution.....

Any ideas on what I could do so I can get over this roadblock? Any help would be appreciated

Edited by noodleBowl

• 10
• 12
• 10
• 10
• 11
• ### Similar Content

• Good Evening,
I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on.
In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
Regards,
LifeArtist
• By QQemka
Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
Let's go:
Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
• By RenanRR
Hi All,
I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
#version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);
So, some doubts:
- Why use it like that?
- Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
-in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
- I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?

What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
it's right?

Thank you

• Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
// algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
extractedData /= 255.0f;

• While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?