Hello Everybody:
Well, it took forever (huge demo for People I Can't Mention) but I finally got a new poll for November up on the Game AI site. This month's poll asks developers what language are they using to build their AI--the "standard" C/C++, Java, or something else? I'd love to hear what you're using--I get this question a lot and the field is always evolving.
Thanks for your time!
Ferretman
ferretman@gameai.com
www.gameai.com
From the High Mountains of Colorado
Edited by - Ferretman on November 9, 2001 11:28:36 PM
November Game AI Poll
Although I have always used C/C++ for all my professional work, I recently had to implement an idea that wasn''t certain to work having only just joined a new company.
I won''t go into details but the 3D engine at the time had no line drawing facility, the debugger was terrible (and I was new to it), the game compile and load times were considerable (especially touching certain header files I had no option but to touch) and I was new to the code base, which was 10 months down the line.
In the end I implemented the idea in a java testbed, using my own codebase from previous personal work, to check the idea was sound using tools I knew well. It was up and running within a few days and much of the code could be quickly copied (with obvious adjustments and rewriting where necessary) from Java to C++ for use in the actual game. Beyond that, as the idea that was being implemented was for optimisation of certain pathfinding ideas that weren''t designed to make obvious visible changes to the game, having the Java testbed with line drawing was useful when it came to showing the milestone to our external producer and explaining why I''d spent so much time on it.
The game engine now loads in a fraction of the time and I know the code and company tools a lot better (line drawing is still on its way), so I may not do this kind of testbed again, but its good to have the option.
Mike
I won''t go into details but the 3D engine at the time had no line drawing facility, the debugger was terrible (and I was new to it), the game compile and load times were considerable (especially touching certain header files I had no option but to touch) and I was new to the code base, which was 10 months down the line.
In the end I implemented the idea in a java testbed, using my own codebase from previous personal work, to check the idea was sound using tools I knew well. It was up and running within a few days and much of the code could be quickly copied (with obvious adjustments and rewriting where necessary) from Java to C++ for use in the actual game. Beyond that, as the idea that was being implemented was for optimisation of certain pathfinding ideas that weren''t designed to make obvious visible changes to the game, having the Java testbed with line drawing was useful when it came to showing the milestone to our external producer and explaining why I''d spent so much time on it.
The game engine now loads in a fraction of the time and I know the code and company tools a lot better (line drawing is still on its way), so I may not do this kind of testbed again, but its good to have the option.
Mike
I use C++. Simply because it can do everything I need, and I know how to work swiftly with it :-)
Author
quote:Original post by Ronin_54
I use C++. Simply because it can do everything I need, and I know how to work swiftly with it :-)
That's pretty much the same situation I've found myself in too. I know C/C++ and they work (and they've gotten much more dependable since STL) and haven't really needed to mess with anything else. I've always kinda wanted to dabble with Java but never really had the need or the time.
Ferretman
ferretman@gameai.com
www.gameai.com
From the High Mountains of Colorado
Edited by - Ferretman on November 10, 2001 11:43:40 AM
Author
quote:Original post by MikeD
In the end I implemented the idea in a java testbed, using my own codebase from previous personal work, to check the idea was sound using tools I knew well. It was up and running within a few days and much of the code could be quickly copied (with obvious adjustments and rewriting where necessary) from Java to C++ for use in the actual game. Beyond that, as the idea that was being implemented was for optimisation of certain pathfinding ideas that weren't designed to make obvious visible changes to the game, having the Java testbed with line drawing was useful when it came to showing the milestone to our external producer and explaining why I'd spent so much time on it.
The game engine now loads in a fraction of the time and I know the code and company tools a lot better (line drawing is still on its way), so I may not do this kind of testbed again, but its good to have the option.
Mike
Yeah, I think a lot of developers don't give enough thought to testing out their ideas using some other language or approach--if the game isn't ready [[]they aren't, and that's just not right. I know of at least two developers (myself included) who often "prototype" the AI and get its interfaces down using pure ASCII text files and simple 2D displays. If they work right there and I can define the interfaces that the other programmers are supposed to call, I can still work out the kinks and be testing without major portions of the game being active.
It's cool you've got that option, Mike.
Ferretman
ferretman@gameai.com
www.gameai.com
From the High Mountains of Colorado
Edited by - Ferretman on November 10, 2001 11:44:12 AM
Hrm, well, my realtime games are still in C++, although I don''t use templates, or operator overloading. Basicly, my C++ code looks like Java code. I don''t use any C++ features not found in Java (as prescribed). 
Now, all my _tools_ are written in Java. The AWT GUI system is quite nice for editors of all sort, rapid development of GUI applications. I would also write converters/parsers and generators in Java, in other words, non-real time apps: Java, realtime apps: C++..
--bart
Now, all my _tools_ are written in Java. The AWT GUI system is quite nice for editors of all sort, rapid development of GUI applications. I would also write converters/parsers and generators in Java, in other words, non-real time apps: Java, realtime apps: C++..
--bart
quote:Original post by Ferretman
I know C/C++ and they work (and they''ve gotten much more dependable since STL) and haven''t really needed to mess with anything else. I''ve always kinda wanted to dabble with Java but never really had the need or the time.
Is there any point trying Java for AI when you have C/C++? Not that I''m saying Java is a useless language - far from it - but I would think that it wouldn''t offer any AI-related benefits over any other similar procedural/OO language, such as C++. I''d think that playing with Prolog or Lisp could be more useful, but then I''m not much of an expert
My 2 cents worth...
I do almost all of my AI prototyping using Matlab, mainly because I can easily interface any existing C and/or C++ code into my Matlab project and because it provides both complex mathematical tools along with GUI tools. Many AI ideas that would otherwise take many pages of code are easily implemented in a few lines in Matlab.
Of course I must add that none of my AI work as gone into a production game. This doesn''t mean that others would not benefit from investigating Matlab for AI development.
Cheers,
Timkin
I do almost all of my AI prototyping using Matlab, mainly because I can easily interface any existing C and/or C++ code into my Matlab project and because it provides both complex mathematical tools along with GUI tools. Many AI ideas that would otherwise take many pages of code are easily implemented in a few lines in Matlab.
Of course I must add that none of my AI work as gone into a production game. This doesn''t mean that others would not benefit from investigating Matlab for AI development.
Cheers,
Timkin
I get to check out Matlab as part of my course later in the year. I will pay more attention now that someone else has recommended it
Author
quote:Original post by Kylotan
Is there any point trying Java for AI when you have C/C++? Not that I''m saying Java is a useless language - far from it - but I would think that it wouldn''t offer any AI-related benefits over any other similar procedural/OO language, such as C++. I''d think that playing with Prolog or Lisp could be more useful, but then I''m not much of an expert
Good point. I guess the biggest advantage is that you don''t have to compile it...just tweak and try again. I suppose you COULD also run it interpreted for development and then compile it for shipping (there are Java cmpilers out there I think)...that might let you tweak quickly while still gaining speed later.
Just a thought though. As I mentioned earlier I''ve always thought it would be neat to use Java without actually ever having done it myself...
Ferretman
ferretman@gameai.com
www.gameai.com
From the High Mountains of Colorado
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement