• Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By Jens Eckervogt
      Hello guys, 
       
      Please tell me! 
      How do I know? Why does wavefront not show for me?
      I already checked I have non errors yet.
      using OpenTK; using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; namespace Tutorial_08.net.sourceskyboxer { public class WaveFrontLoader { private static List<Vector3> vertices; private static List<Vector2> textures; private static List<Vector3> normals; private static List<int> indices; private static float[] verticesArray; private static float[] normalsArray; private static float[] texturesArray; private static int[] indicesArray; private static string[] lines; public static RawModel LoadObjModel(string filename, Loader loader) { if (!File.Exists("Contents/" + filename + ".obj")) { throw new FileNotFoundException("Error: wavefront file doesn't exist path: " + filename + ".png"); } vertices = new List<Vector3>(); textures = new List<Vector2>(); normals = new List<Vector3>(); indices = new List<int>(); lines = File.ReadAllLines("Contents/" + filename + ".obj"); try { foreach (string line in lines) { if (line == "" || line.StartsWith("#")) continue; string[] token = line.Split(' '); switch(token[0]) { case ("o"): string o = token[1]; break; case "v": Vector3 vertex = new Vector3(float.Parse(token[1]), float.Parse(token[2]), float.Parse(token[3])); vertices.Add(vertex); break; case "vn": Vector3 normal = new Vector3(float.Parse(token[1]), float.Parse(token[2]), float.Parse(token[3])); normals.Add(normal); break; case "vt": Vector2 texture = new Vector2(float.Parse(token[1]), float.Parse(token[2])); textures.Add(texture); break; case "f": texturesArray = new float[vertices.Count * 2]; normalsArray = new float[vertices.Count * 3]; verticesArray = new float[vertices.Count * 3]; indicesArray = new int[indices.Count]; int vertexPointer = 0; foreach (Vector3 vex in vertices) { verticesArray[vertexPointer++] = vex.X; verticesArray[vertexPointer++] = vex.Y; verticesArray[vertexPointer++] = vex.Z; } for (int i = 0; i < indices.Count; i++) { indicesArray[i] = indices[i]; } break; } } } catch (FileNotFoundException f) { throw new FileNotFoundException($"OBJ file not found: {f.FileName}", f); } catch (ArgumentException ae) { throw new ArgumentException("OBJ file is damaged", ae); } return loader.loadToVAO(verticesArray, texturesArray, indicesArray); } } } And It have tried other method but it can't show for me.  I am mad now. Because any OpenTK developers won't help me.
      Please help me how do I fix.

      And my download (mega.nz) should it is original but I tried no success...
      - Add blend source and png file here I have tried tried,.....  
       
      PS: Why is our community not active? I wait very longer. Stop to lie me!
      Thanks !
    • By codelyoko373
      I wasn't sure if this would be the right place for a topic like this so sorry if it isn't.
      I'm currently working on a project for Uni using FreeGLUT to make a simple solar system simulation. I've got to the point where I've implemented all the planets and have used a Scene Graph to link them all together. The issue I'm having with now though is basically the planets and moons orbit correctly at their own orbit speeds.
      I'm not really experienced with using matrices for stuff like this so It's likely why I can't figure out how exactly to get it working. This is where I'm applying the transformation matrices, as well as pushing and popping them. This is within the Render function that every planet including the sun and moons will have and run.
      if (tag != "Sun") { glRotatef(orbitAngle, orbitRotation.X, orbitRotation.Y, orbitRotation.Z); } glPushMatrix(); glTranslatef(position.X, position.Y, position.Z); glRotatef(rotationAngle, rotation.X, rotation.Y, rotation.Z); glScalef(scale.X, scale.Y, scale.Z); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, mesh->indiceCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, mesh->indices); if (tag != "Sun") { glPopMatrix(); } The "If(tag != "Sun")" parts are my attempts are getting the planets to orbit correctly though it likely isn't the way I'm meant to be doing it. So I was wondering if someone would be able to help me? As I really don't have an idea on what I would do to get it working. Using the if statement is truthfully the closest I've got to it working but there are still weird effects like the planets orbiting faster then they should depending on the number of planets actually be updated/rendered.
    • By Jens Eckervogt
      Hello everyone, 
      I have problem with texture
      using System; using OpenTK; using OpenTK.Input; using OpenTK.Graphics; using OpenTK.Graphics.OpenGL4; using System.Drawing; using System.Reflection; namespace Tutorial_05 { class Game : GameWindow { private static int WIDTH = 1200; private static int HEIGHT = 720; private static KeyboardState keyState; private int vaoID; private int vboID; private int iboID; private Vector3[] vertices = { new Vector3(-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f), // V0 new Vector3(-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f), // V1 new Vector3(0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f), // V2 new Vector3(0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f) // V3 }; private Vector2[] texcoords = { new Vector2(0, 0), new Vector2(0, 1), new Vector2(1, 1), new Vector2(1, 0) }; private int[] indices = { 0, 1, 3, 3, 1, 2 }; private string vertsrc = @"#version 450 core in vec3 position; in vec2 textureCoords; out vec2 pass_textureCoords; void main(void) { gl_Position = vec4(position, 1.0); pass_textureCoords = textureCoords; }"; private string fragsrc = @"#version 450 core in vec2 pass_textureCoords; out vec4 out_color; uniform sampler2D textureSampler; void main(void) { out_color = texture(textureSampler, pass_textureCoords); }"; private int programID; private int vertexShaderID; private int fragmentShaderID; private int textureID; private Bitmap texsrc; public Game() : base(WIDTH, HEIGHT, GraphicsMode.Default, "Tutorial 05 - Texturing", GameWindowFlags.Default, DisplayDevice.Default, 4, 5, GraphicsContextFlags.Default) { } protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { base.OnLoad(e); CursorVisible = true; GL.GenVertexArrays(1, out vaoID); GL.BindVertexArray(vaoID); GL.GenBuffers(1, out vboID); GL.BindBuffer(BufferTarget.ArrayBuffer, vboID); GL.BufferData(BufferTarget.ArrayBuffer, (IntPtr)(vertices.Length * Vector3.SizeInBytes), vertices, BufferUsageHint.StaticDraw); GL.GenBuffers(1, out iboID); GL.BindBuffer(BufferTarget.ElementArrayBuffer, iboID); GL.BufferData(BufferTarget.ElementArrayBuffer, (IntPtr)(indices.Length * sizeof(int)), indices, BufferUsageHint.StaticDraw); vertexShaderID = GL.CreateShader(ShaderType.VertexShader); GL.ShaderSource(vertexShaderID, vertsrc); GL.CompileShader(vertexShaderID); fragmentShaderID = GL.CreateShader(ShaderType.FragmentShader); GL.ShaderSource(fragmentShaderID, fragsrc); GL.CompileShader(fragmentShaderID); programID = GL.CreateProgram(); GL.AttachShader(programID, vertexShaderID); GL.AttachShader(programID, fragmentShaderID); GL.LinkProgram(programID); // Loading texture from embedded resource texsrc = new Bitmap(Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().GetManifestResourceStream("Tutorial_05.example.png")); textureID = GL.GenTexture(); GL.BindTexture(TextureTarget.Texture2D, textureID); GL.TexParameter(TextureTarget.Texture2D, TextureParameterName.TextureMagFilter, (int)All.Linear); GL.TexParameter(TextureTarget.Texture2D, TextureParameterName.TextureMinFilter, (int)All.Linear); GL.TexImage2D(TextureTarget.Texture2D, 0, PixelInternalFormat.Rgba, texsrc.Width, texsrc.Height, 0, PixelFormat.Bgra, PixelType.UnsignedByte, IntPtr.Zero); System.Drawing.Imaging.BitmapData bitmap_data = texsrc.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, texsrc.Width, texsrc.Height), System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.ReadOnly, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppRgb); GL.TexSubImage2D(TextureTarget.Texture2D, 0, 0, 0, texsrc.Width, texsrc.Height, PixelFormat.Bgra, PixelType.UnsignedByte, bitmap_data.Scan0); texsrc.UnlockBits(bitmap_data); GL.Enable(EnableCap.Texture2D); GL.BufferData(BufferTarget.TextureBuffer, (IntPtr)(texcoords.Length * Vector2.SizeInBytes), texcoords, BufferUsageHint.StaticDraw); GL.BindAttribLocation(programID, 0, "position"); GL.BindAttribLocation(programID, 1, "textureCoords"); } protected override void OnResize(EventArgs e) { base.OnResize(e); GL.Viewport(0, 0, ClientRectangle.Width, ClientRectangle.Height); } protected override void OnUpdateFrame(FrameEventArgs e) { base.OnUpdateFrame(e); keyState = Keyboard.GetState(); if (keyState.IsKeyDown(Key.Escape)) { Exit(); } } protected override void OnRenderFrame(FrameEventArgs e) { base.OnRenderFrame(e); // Prepare for background GL.Clear(ClearBufferMask.ColorBufferBit); GL.ClearColor(Color4.Red); // Draw traingles GL.EnableVertexAttribArray(0); GL.EnableVertexAttribArray(1); GL.BindVertexArray(vaoID); GL.UseProgram(programID); GL.BindBuffer(BufferTarget.ArrayBuffer, vboID); GL.VertexAttribPointer(0, 3, VertexAttribPointerType.Float, false, 0, IntPtr.Zero); GL.ActiveTexture(TextureUnit.Texture0); GL.BindTexture(TextureTarget.Texture3D, textureID); GL.BindBuffer(BufferTarget.ElementArrayBuffer, iboID); GL.DrawElements(BeginMode.Triangles, indices.Length, DrawElementsType.UnsignedInt, 0); GL.DisableVertexAttribArray(0); GL.DisableVertexAttribArray(1); SwapBuffers(); } protected override void OnClosed(EventArgs e) { base.OnClosed(e); GL.DeleteVertexArray(vaoID); GL.DeleteBuffer(vboID); } } } I can not remember where do I add GL.Uniform2();
    • By Jens Eckervogt
      Hello everyone
      For @80bserver8 nice job - I have found Google search. How did you port from Javascript WebGL to C# OpenTK.?
      I have been searched Google but it shows f***ing Unity 3D. I really want know how do I understand I want start with OpenTK But I want know where is porting of Javascript and C#?
       
      Thanks!
    • By mike44
      Hi
      I draw in a OpenGL framebuffer. All is fine but it eats FPS (frames per second), hence I wonder if I could execute the framebuffer drawing only every 5-10th loop or so?
      Many thanks
       
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL glBindTexture - what is the technical reason that it is slow?

This topic is 1140 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I've been looking all over the place for an answer to this question and I'm only getting bits and pieces of the answer. I learned the hard way a long time ago that calling glBindTexture is relatively slow; I found out from a friend of mine that it was because I was binding the texture every time I drew a triangle lol! The simple fact is that calling glBindTexture comes at a price, and minimizing calls is always the best choice!

 

Anyway, there's a reason it's slower than most other function calls that change the opengl states, and I'm looking for the technical answer.

 

So far, with my limited understanding of hardware in general, the main reason I think it's slow is because every time you call glBindTexture, the hardware copies the texture from Texture RAM into the Texture Cache because the Cache is faster to read from. Although the copy is fast in it's own right, copying larger textures should take longer than smaller textures, and if done enough times no matter the size of the texture, will become a performance bottleneck.

 

Yes/No? Is there more to it than that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
There's no copying going on, generally, unless your GPU is very memory constrained.

It's mostly a driver issue and more to do with flushing states out to the execution cores, how shaders are scheduled, how the resource binding tables are configured, flipping read/write states on textures automagically for you, swapping out sampler states (since those are embedded into the texture in older OpenGL versions), and so on.

In other words, it can be super super fast. The driver - and the specific call you're referring to, glBindTexture - is slow. Switch to bindless approaches and you'll see it get much faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused. Is glBindTexture still slow, but not for the reason I thought, and it's been replaced by a different function: a bindless function?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind, it just sunk in. It doesn't seem like that would be the reasons for being so slow, but I don't really understand the hardware.

 

What's the bind-less function thing you're talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind, it just sunk in. It doesn't seem like that would be the reasons for being so slow, but I don't really understand the hardware.
 
What's the bind-less function thing you're talking about?


Modern hardware doesn't bind texture slots. It has a huge giant array of resources. Some hardware uses separate arrays for different kinds of resources while some hardware mixes a certain subset of resources into one array.

Bindless is a feature of very recent OpenGL and Direct3D versions. All that "bindless" means in this case is that you don't have to call the various 'glBind*' functions to swap resources; instead, your shader indexes into these arrays to get at the resources. It's slightly more complicated than that, but not too much.

You may have to use texture arrays to simulate bindless textures for compatibility reasons. If you just google "opengl bindless textures" you'll find plenty of materials on the subject. Google "AZDO OpenGL" (AZDO is an acronym that derives from the name of a presentation from a few years back titled "Approaching Zero Driver Overhead") you'll find materials on both bindless resources and some other modern GPU programming primitives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha, so much has changed since I last wrote an OpenGL program! Thanks for the clarification and insight into the latest generation of graphics acceleration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can have a look at what a typical texture bind involve here :

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/mesa/main/texobj.c

As you can see looking at _mesa_test_texobj_completeness it's far from being trivial.

 

There are also state revalidation involved when a call to glDraw* is issued : texture type must match the one expected by the shader, the driver must add a barrier or a cache flush if the texture was previously used as a result of a draw call or a dma transfer, for instance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement