Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

HEAD

OpenGL OpenGL and Linux (slackware 8.0)

Recommended Posts

I have been running linux for a while, but I recently became interested (or re-interested) in game programming and the like. I have been looking around and OpenGL seems to be the API I wish to use. I have but one problem: how do I set up everything. I have an nVidia card so I have got the GLX and all that installed but I dont know where to get GLU nor can I find anywhere that mentions what a basic framework for getting a window(or fullscreen) open and OpenGL initialized etc... If anyone can a) tell me where to go or b) help me please do. thanks HEAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should already have GLU (you may need to specify the entire path of the library as a parameter to GCC, I had to for some reason, even if I put the directory it is in as a -L argument). Look at NeHe''s site for ports of his OpenGL tutorials to GLX (or SDL, which is what I use).

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i looked again and is it in /usr/include/GL/ And is it a symlink to some of the X directories.

thanks

HEAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by HEAD
I have been running linux for a while, but I recently became interested (or re-interested) in game programming and the like. I have been looking around and OpenGL seems to be the API I wish to use. I have but one problem: how do I set up everything. I have an nVidia card so I have got the GLX and all that installed but I dont know where to get GLU nor can I find anywhere that mentions what a basic framework for getting a window(or fullscreen) open and OpenGL initialized etc... If anyone can a) tell me where to go or b) help me please do.

thanks

HEAD


As Null and Void already mentionned, go to nehe.gamedev.net and download one of the first three tutorials for Linux( at the end of the page, you''ll find version for most commonly used platform compilers.



"And that''s the bottom line cause I said so!"

Cyberdrek
Headhunter Soft
A division of DLC Multimedia

Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!

"gitty up" -- Kramer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I checked again in the usr/include/GL directory. glu.h is red(using ls in a terminal) and it is apparently a symlink to ../../X11R6/include/GL/glu.h but when I ls in the GL directory glu.h shows up red with a @ after it and shows a link to itself this makes no sense and nothing will compile. What do I do?



HEAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fix the symlinks!!

It makes me wonder why you want to get into programming in linux if you aren't able to do something as important as fixing symlinks!

Also, SDL is a very good API, which uses openGL in the end.
And its also damn easy to use, because you dont really have to worry about creating windows and all that BS. AND you can use the same code in linux, windows, macOS, beOS and others! (maybe you have to change some small portions of code).

http://www.libsdl.org

Edited by - Xetrov on November 15, 2001 9:49:58 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A couple people here mentioned SDL.

I'll have to recommend AllegroGL:

http://www.allegrogl.sourceforge.net

In my opinion it is much cleaner and nicer than SDL. It's also portable to a bunch of platforms.

Edited by - wolfman8k on November 16, 2001 12:30:10 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have used SDL a little but I want openGL because it already has all the 3D stuff implemented (like the triangle and quad code as well as the transformations and lighting etc...) Does anyone know where I can find glu.h by itself or in a tarball. All I can do is find it in rpms and I dont want that.
thx

HEAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3

download the oss-opengl-glu-20000925-1.i386.rpm, i hope you can install rpms on your distro (or at least extract files from them) cause rebuilding the oss-opengl yourself is a bit of a pain in the butt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
Ooops, i didn''t see your new message about no rpm. Get the alien package converter and convert the rpm to a format that works with your distro (including a simple tarball):
http://kitenet.net/programs/alien/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry I was unclear. I can use rpms but I dont like them...I prefer to break things all by myself. Its tarballs for me(when i can get them)

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627738
    • Total Posts
      2978881
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now