Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
TheInfernalCow

OpenGL OpenGL Efficient Rendering of 2D Sprites

This topic is 919 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi, 

 

It's my first post here so sorry if this is in the wrong place. I am currently trying to make a basic 2D game in c++ and opengl, to help familiarise myself with using opengl practically (putting it into an object orientated context). My current rendering system (which I implemented yesterday, so it is very easy to remove/modify) involves a 'Sprite' class which holds a position, a texture and a texture rectangle, and whenever one of these are modified, I generate the new vertex data:

GLfloat vertices[] = {
     mPosition.x, mPosition.y, (mTextureRect.x)/mTexture->getWidth(), (mTextureRect.y)/mTexture->getHeight(),
    mPosition.x + mTextureRect.width, (mTextureRect.x + mTextureRect.width)/mTexture->getWidth, mTextureRect.y/mTexture->getHeight()

    //And so on for all 6 points (2 triangles) that make up the texture rectangle. (first two vertices are the position, second two are the UV coordinates).
}

and stick it in a VAO which the sprite owns. Basically this means that whenever the sprites position changes, I have to update the vertex array. The renderer class then just binds the vao, draws the texture and unbinds the vao.

 

Now this is working fine at the moment, but in terms of performance when I've got 30+ sprites on the screen which positions are constantly being updated, then I feel this method may be too slow. Another thing I don't like about this implementation is that the sprite has a position attribute, but without this I would have to update the VAO every draw call which kinda defeats the whole point. Obviously my implementation is nowhere near optimal, and I'm not looking for insane performance, but I feel like there are methods which are just as easy to implement yet would yield lots better performance.

 

What I'm asking is what alternative methods are there to rendering 2D sprites efficiently, and does anyone have any examples of 2D rendering systems (or 3D ones that are fairly simple - most 3D examples that I've looked at seem very complicated and way out of the scope of my little 2d game). Sorry if this isn't formatted right, in wrong place or doesn't really make sense, just ask if you need clarification on what I'm asking.

 

Thanks in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

and stick it in a VAO which the sprite owns

...

I've got 30+ sprites on the screen which positions are constantly being updated,

Means you're issuing draw call on every sprite?

It should be much faster to upload data from all visible sprites into single vertex buffer and draw it.

Even if that buffer will be rebuilt from scratch every frame.

Just make sure you're not updating same buffer, that would stall cpu, since it will have to wait until gpu finished rendering.

Best would be to have 2 buffers. While one buffer is being rendered, you're filling data in next buffer, then swap them.

 

 

 


Another thing I don't like about this implementation is that the sprite has a position attribute, but without this I would have to update the VAO

It's totally ok to continuously update data in vbo. You're not changing vao, you're only updating data in vbo that is already part of vao.

There's no overheads related to vao in that way.

 

Also you can split your scene in few chunks, either by sprite position or by movement update frequency, and update only those chunks that has sprites moved.

Edited by vstrakh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply. Firstly, yes, my current implementation does involve a draw call for every single sprite. So, if I've understood correctly, I should only need one VAO which is owned by the renderer, and in the draw method instead of directly drawing to the screen, get the vertex data from the sprite and stick it into a vbo. Then, after this has been done for every sprite, send this data over to the GPU. 

 

Now, how would I go about binding different textures throughout all of this? Currently my draw call looks something like this:

 

void Renderer::draw(Sprite sprite)
{
    mShader.enable();


    sprite.getTexture()->bind();
    glBindVertexArray(sprite.mVAO);
    glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 6);
    sprite.getTexture()->unbind();


}

So how would the renderer know which texture to bind for different vertex data? Sorry if these questions seem trivial, im just trying to wrap my head around this stuff. Also, do you know any simple examples of 2D renderers which I could at for reference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look up texture atlases - there's plenty of information on them, and they're one way of solving your problem.

 

A related tip - that unbind is wasteful.  You frequently see it in tutorials, but it doesn't actually achieve anything useful, and if you end up rendering two or more sprites with the same texture you'll only end up losing more performance by introducing unnecessary state changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for the reply, texture atlases seem to be the kind of thing I'm looking for. I found a nice thread on stackexchange here which seems to outline what I'm looking for: http://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/30362/drawing-lots-of-tiles-with-opengl-the-modern-way

 

One more quick question - I feel like packing every single sprite in the game into one texture atlas is going to get very messy, especially if I choose to change the atlas or add a new texture later. Would it be worth having a few atlases, for example, one for the tiled background, one for the player, and one for other entities (enemies etc)?

 

EDIT: Further researching and people are suggesting TEXTURE_2D_ARRAY as an alternative to texture atlases - is this a good idea?

Edited by TheInfernalCow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is that it's usually not too bad with a drawcall for each sprite unless you have on the order of at least several thousand. GL draw-calls are pretty fast, assuming you still use a texture-atlas and don't switch textures for each one (+ sort by texture either way, even with the atlas).

It's uncommon that sprites have any other bottle-neck than fillrate, unless you do something like very many small particles. If your sprites are reasonably large, then sorting by texture or even area of a texture to improve cache usage can give much more benefit in itself than every possible optimization of the vertices does.

 

When sprites are sorted by texture then changing textures won't matter too much, so several atlases isn't a bad idea, and if you have sprites with many animation frames you will probably end up with one texture per sprite for the animated ones to fit all the frames.

Count the number of texture switches, if you only save a few texture switches by combining an atlas with another then it probably isn't worth it, but if you need to switch atlas between every other sprite then combining them has a large benefit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is that it's usually not too bad with a drawcall for each sprite unless you have on the order of at least several thousand. GL draw-calls are pretty fast, assuming you still use a texture-atlas and don't switch textures for each one (+ sort by texture either way, even with the atlas).

It's uncommon that sprites have any other bottle-neck than fillrate, unless you do something like very many small particles. If your sprites are reasonably large, then sorting by texture or even area of a texture to improve cache usage can give much more benefit in itself than every possible optimization of the vertices does.

 

When sprites are sorted by texture then changing textures won't matter too much, so several atlases isn't a bad idea, and if you have sprites with many animation frames you will probably end up with one texture per sprite for the animated ones to fit all the frames.

Count the number of texture switches, if you only save a few texture switches by combining an atlas with another then it probably isn't worth it, but if you need to switch atlas between every other sprite then combining them has a large benefit.

Ok thanks for the reply - my current thought is to use 3 texture atlases and vbos - one for each of : the player (dynamic), the tilemap (static), and miscellaneous objects such as enemies and moving platforms ( dynamic - cant put moving platforms into the tilemap vbo as the platforms' positions will be constantly updated). This way there is only 3 texture switches and 3 vbo switches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have a look at the batch renderer article that I published here: http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/_/technical/opengl/opengl-batch-rendering-r3900

Basically when I want to render sprites, I send them down to the batch renderer. It is responsible for grouping the vert's into buckets and when I'm ready to render my frame, it just empties all the render buckets that it has stored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the batch renderer article that I published here: http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/_/technical/opengl/opengl-batch-rendering-r3900

Basically when I want to render sprites, I send them down to the batch renderer. It is responsible for grouping the vert's into buckets and when I'm ready to render my frame, it just empties all the render buckets that it has stored.

Ahh thankyou that is also of some use to me. Ill look into batching techniques and see how I could implement them in my renderer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bindless would make this whole texture atlas thing wholly unnecessary, but we're getting into very sophisticated (and audience-limited) uses of OpenGL that are probably not needed. I stream my 2D vertices into persistent mapped buffers and don't atlas anything, one draw call per element, and it's never been a problem for UI code. Atlases are definitely better, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Similar Content

    • By McGrane
      Hey
      My laptop recently decided to die, so Ive been transferring my project to my work laptop just to get it up to date, and commit it. I was banging my head against the wall all day, as my textures where not displaying in my program- I was getting no errors and no indication of why it was occurring so I have been just trying to figure it out- I know the image loading was working ok, as im using image data elsewhere, I was pretty confident that the code was fine also, as ive never had an issue with displaying textures before, so I thought it might be the drivers on this laptop, (my old one was just using the built in IntelHD, while this laptop has a NVIDIA graphics card) but all seems to be up to date.
      Below are my basic shaders:
      Vertex Shader
      #version 330 core layout(location = 0) in vec3 position; layout(location = 1) in vec3 color; layout(location = 2) in vec3 normal; layout(location = 3) in vec2 texCoord; uniform mat4 Projection; uniform mat4 Model; out vec3 Color; out vec3 Normal; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position = Projection * Model * vec4( position, 1.0 ); Color = color; Normal = normal; TexCoord = vec2( texCoord.x, texCoord.y); } Fragment Shader
      #version 330 core in vec3 Color; in vec3 Normal; in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D textureData; void main() { vec4 textureColor = texture( textureData, TexCoord ); vec4 finalColor = textureColor * vec4( Color, 1.0f); gl_FragColor = finalColor; } Calling Code
      glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textureID); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderID, "textureData"), textureID); Now this is the part i dont understand, I worked through my program, until I got to the above 'Calling Code'. This just displays a black texture.. my original issue. Out of desperation, I just tried changing the name in glGetUniformLocation from "textureData" to "textureData_invalid" to see if my error checks would through up something, but in actual fact, it is now displaying the texture as expected. Can anyone fathom a guess as too why this is occurring.. im assuming the random text is just picking up the correct location by c++ witchcraft, but why is the original one not getting picked up correctly and/or not working as expected
      I realize more code is probably needed to see how it all hangs together.. but it seems to come down to this as the issue
    • By QQemka
      Hello. So far i got decently looking 3d scene. I also managed to render a truetype font, on my way to implementing gui (windows, buttons and textboxes). There are several issues i am facing, would love to hear your feedback.
      1) I render text using atlas with VBO containing x/y/u/v of every digit in the atlas (calculated basing on x/y/z/width/height/xoffset/yoffset/xadvance data in binary .fnt format file, screenshot 1). I generated a Comic Sans MS with 32 size and times new roman with size 12 (screenshot 2 and 3). The first issue is the font looks horrible when rescaling. I guess it is because i am using fixed -1 to 1 screen space coords. This is where ortho matrix should be used, right?
      2) Rendering GUI. Situation is similar to above. I guess the widgets should NOT scale when scaling window, am i right? So what am i looking for is saying "this should be always in the middle, 200x200 size no matter the display window xy", and "this should stick to the bottom left corner". Is ortho matrix the cure for all such problems?
      3) The game is 3D but i have to go 2D to render static gui elements over the scene - and i want to do it properly! At the moment i am using matrix 3x3 for 2d transformations and vec3 for all kinds of coordinates. In shaders tho i technically still IS 3D. I have to set all 4 x y z w of the gl_Position while it would be much much more conventient to... just do the maths in 2d space. Can i achieve it somehow?
      4) Text again. I am kind of confused what is the reason of artifacts in Times New Roman font displaying (screenshot 1). I render from left to right, letter after letter. You can clearly see that letters on the right (so the ones rendered after ones on the left are covered by the previous one). I was toying around with blending options but no luck. I do not support kerning at the moment but that's definitely not the cause of error. The display of the small font looks dirty aliased too. I am knd of confused how to interpret the integer data and how should be scaled/adapted to the screen view. Is it just store the data as constant size and again - use ortho matrix?
      Thanks in advance for all your ideas and suggestions!
      https://i.imgur.com/4rd1VC3.png
      https://i.imgur.com/uHrSXfe.png
      https://i.imgur.com/xRTffPn.png
    • By plz717
      Hello, everyone! I hope my problem isn't too 'beginnerish'. I'm doing research on motion synthesis now, trying to implement the Deep Mimic paper (DeepMimic) by BINPENG XUE, in this paper, I need to first retarget character A's motion to another character B to make the reference motion clips for character B, since we don't have character B‘s reference motion. The most important thing is that in the paper, the author copied character A's joint's rotation with respective to joint's local coordinate system (not the parent) to character B. In my personal understanding, the joint's rotation with respective to joint's local coordinate system is something like that in the attached photo, where for the Elbow joint, i need to get the Elbow's rotation in the elbow's local coordinate system (i'm very grateful for you to share your ideas if i have misunderstanding about it 🙂)
      I have searched many materials on the internet about how to extract the local joint's information from FBX, the most relative one i found is the pivot rotation( and geometric transformation, object offset transformation). I'm a beginner in computer graphics, and i'm confused about whether the pivot rotation( or geometric transformation, object offset transformation) is exactly the joint's local rotation i'm seeking? I hope someone that have any ideas can help me, I'd be very grateful for any pointers in the right direction. Thanks in advance! 

    • By nOoNEE
      hello guys , i have some questions  what does glLinkProgram  and  glBindAttribLocation do?  i searched but there wasnt any good resource 
    • By owenjr
      Hi, I'm a Multimedia Engineering student. I am about to finish my dergree and I'm already thinking about what topic to cover in my final college project.
      I'm interested in the procedural animation with c++ and OpenGL of creatures, something like a spider for example. Can someone tell me what are the issues I should investigate to carry it out? I understand that it has some dependence on artificial intelligence but I do not know to what extent. Can someone help me to find information about it? Thank you very much.
       
      Examples: 
      - Procedural multi-legged walking animation
      - Procedural Locomotion of Multi-Legged Characters in Dynamic Environments
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm still on my quest to unterstanding the intricacies of HDR and implementing this into my engine. Currently i'm at the step to implementing tonemapping. I stumbled upon this blogposts:
      http://filmicworlds.com/blog/filmic-tonemapping-operators/
      http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2012/09/tech-feature-hdr-lightning.html
      and tried to implement some of those mentioned tonemapping methods into my postprocessing shader.
      The issue is that none of them creates the same results as shown in the blogpost which definitely has to do with the initial range in which the values are stored in the HDR buffer. For simplicity sake i store the values between 0 and 1 in the HDR buffer (ambient light is 0.3, directional light is 0.7)
      This is the tonemapping code:
      vec3 Uncharted2Tonemap(vec3 x) { float A = 0.15; float B = 0.50; float C = 0.10; float D = 0.20; float E = 0.02; float F = 0.30; return ((x*(A*x+C*B)+D*E)/(x*(A*x+B)+D*F))-E/F; } This is without the uncharted tonemapping:
      This is with the uncharted tonemapping:
      Which makes the image a lot darker.
      The shader code looks like this:
      void main() { vec3 color = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = Uncharted2Tonemap(color); //gamma correction (use only if not done in tonemapping code) color = gammaCorrection(color); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } Now, from my understanding is that tonemapping should bring the range down from HDR to 0-1.
      But the output of the tonemapping function heavily depends on the initial range of the values in the HDR buffer. (You can't expect to set the sun intensity the first time to 10 and the second time to 1000 and excpect the same result if you feed that into the tonemapper.) So i suppose that this also depends on the exposure which i have to implement?
      To check this i plotted the tonemapping curve:
      You can see that the curve goes only up to around to a value of 0.21 (while being fed a value of 1) and then basically flattens out. (which would explain why the image got darker.)
       
      My guestion is: In what range should the values in the HDR buffer be which then get tonemapped? Do i have to bring them down to a range of 0-1 by multiplying with the exposure?
      For example, if i increase the values of the light by 10 (directional light would be 7 and ambient light 3) then i would need to divide HDR values by 10 in order to get a value range of 0-1 which then could be fed into the tonemapping curve. Is that correct?
    • By nOoNEE
      i am reading this book : link
      in the OpenGL Rendering Pipeline section there is a picture like this: link
      but the question is this i dont really understand why it is necessary to turn pixel data in to fragment and then fragment into pixel could please give me a source or a clear Explanation that why it is necessary ? thank you so mu
       
       
    • By Inbar_xz
      I'm using the OPENGL with eclipse+JOGL.
      My goal is to create movement of the camera and the player.
      I create main class, which create some box in 3D and hold 
      an object of PlayerAxis.
      I create PlayerAxis class which hold the axis of the player.
      If we want to move the camera, then in the main class I call to 
      the func "cameraMove"(from PlayerAxis) and it update the player axis.
      That's work good.
      The problem start if I move the camera on 2 axis, 
      for example if I move with the camera right(that's on the y axis)
      and then down(on the x axis) -
      in some point the move front is not to the front anymore..
      In order to move to the front, I do
      player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1);
      And I learn that in order to keep the front move, 
      I need to convert (0, 0, 1) to the player axis, and then add this.
      I think I dont do the convert right.. 
      I will be glad for help!

      Here is part of my PlayerAxis class:
       
      //player coordinate float x[] = new float[3]; float y[] = new float[3]; float z[] = new float[3]; public PlayerAxis(float move_step, float angle_move) { x[0] = 1; y[1] = 1; z[2] = -1; step = move_step; angle = angle_move; setTransMatrix(); } public void cameraMoving(float angle_step, String axis) { float[] new_x = x; float[] new_y = y; float[] new_z = z; float alfa = angle_step * angle; switch(axis) { case "x": new_z = addVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); break; case "y": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); new_z = subVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); break; case "z": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); } x = new_x; y = new_y; z = new_z; normalization(); } public void playerMoving(float x_move, float y_move, float z_move) { float[] move = new float[3]; move[0] = x_move; move[1] = y_move; move[2] = z_move; setTransMatrix(); float[] trans_move = transVector(move); position[0] = position[0] + step*trans_move[0]; position[1] = position[1] + step*trans_move[1]; position[2] = position[2] + step*trans_move[2]; } public void setTransMatrix() { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { coordiTrans[0][i] = x[i]; coordiTrans[1][i] = y[i]; coordiTrans[2][i] = z[i]; } } public float[] transVector(float[] v) { return multiplyMatrixInVector(coordiTrans, v); }  
      and in the main class i have this:
       
      public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_ESCAPE) { System.exit(0); //player move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_W) { //front //moveAmount[2] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_S) { //back //moveAmount[2] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, -1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_A) { //left //moveAmount[0] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(-1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_D) { //right //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_E) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 1, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_Q) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, -1, 0); //camera move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_I) { //up player.cameraMoving(1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_K) { //down player.cameraMoving(-1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_L) { //right player.cameraMoving(-1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_J) { //left player.cameraMoving(1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_O) { //right round player.cameraMoving(-1, "z"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_U) { //left round player.cameraMoving(1, "z"); } }  
      finallt found it.... i confused with the transformation matrix row and col. thanks anyway!
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm currently trying to implement an SSAO shader from THIS tutorial and i'm running into a few issues here.
      Now, this SSAO method requires view space positions and normals. I'm storing the normals in my deferred renderer in world-space so i had to do a conversion and reconstruct the position from the depth buffer.
      And something there goes horribly wrong (which has probably to do with worldspace to viewspace transformations).
      (here is the full shader source code if someone wants to take a look at it)
      Now, i suspect that the normals are the culprit.
      vec3 normal = ((uNormalViewMatrix*vec4(normalize(texture2D(sNormals, vTexcoord).rgb),1.0)).xyz); "sNormals" is a 2D texture which stores the normals in world space in a RGB FP16 buffer.
      Now i can't use the camera viewspace matrix to transform the normals into viewspace as the cameras position isn't set at (0,0,0), thus skewing the result.
      So what i did is to create a new viewmatrix specifically for this normal without the position at vec3(0,0,0);
      //"camera" is the camera which was used for rendering the normal buffer renderer.setUniform4m(ressources->shaderSSAO->getUniform("uNormalViewMatrix"), glmExt::createViewMatrix(glm::vec3(0,0,0),camera.getForward(),camera.getUp())//parameters are (position,forwardVector,upVector) ); Though i have the feeling this is the wrong approach. Is this right or is there a better/correct way of transforming a world space normal into viewspace?
    • By HawkDeath
      Hi,
      I'm trying mix two textures using own shader system, but I have a problem (I think) with uniforms.
      Code: https://github.com/HawkDeath/shader/tree/test
      To debug I use RenderDocs, but I did not receive good results. In the first attachment is my result, in the second attachment is what should be.
      PS. I base on this tutorial https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Textures.


  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      631398
    • Total Posts
      2999837
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!