• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Deriving L_o for directional light

This topic is 827 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I've been reading some ray-tracing book and stumbled upon something that really intrugued me. The author derives the simple dot(N, L) equation for an ideal directional light (assume white light (1,1,1)).

But let's start from the top. The direct illumination formula is this:



The final formula for L_o is:


(where l is light'd direction)


The author states that in order for the equation to end up like this, L_i must be:



I was curious enough to verify it and indeed:

A is cos(theta_l), B is phi_l. Note that I skipped BRDF f function.


Now my simple question is: why is L_i the way it is? How was it derived?

Edited by maxest

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement