Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Alundra

Moment Shadow Maps for Single Scattering, Soft Shadows and Translucent Occluders - i3D 2016

This topic is 993 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi,

here a video about the update of the MSM shadowing technique :

I remember MJP did an article about it and said EVSM still the best, is it always the case ?

Thanks

Edited by Alundra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

It's important to note this paper, which is here: http://cg.cs.uni-bonn.de/aigaion2root/attachments/MSMBeyondHardShadows.pdf

 

Concerns itself with filtering shadows for use in light scattering, aka: https://graphics.tudelft.nl/Publications-new/2014/KSE14/KSE14.pdf

Things like this, or Nvidia's hacky tessellation based god rays, are fine, but most people use something like: http://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2015/Frostbite%20PB%20and%20unified%20volumetrics.pptx

Which can support multiple lights easier, support visible fog volumes, and even do stuff like volumetric clouds: http://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2015/The%20Real-time%20Volumetric%20Cloudscapes%20of%20Horizon%20-%20Zero%20Dawn%20-%20ARTR.pdf , all potentially faster than the previous.

That being said you can still use the moment shadow mapping stuff for filtering, and the video/paper you're interested in seems to make the pre-filtered single scattering more efficient.

 

The paper you mention is also used to filter translucent occluders and soft shadows, aka something like: http://www.crytek.com/download/Playing%20with%20Real-Time%20Shadows.pdf  Both are nice to have if you can afford it.

 

But to get this long winded reply summed up, for filtering shadows you can still use exponential variance shadow mapping, which is still better looking for relatively the same speed as moment shadow mapping. Or, for say, filtering shadows specifically for atmospheric scattering/shadows on particles/etc. you can just use normal variance shadow mapping, and hope users don't notice the light leak because it's just atmospheric scattering/particles.

Edited by Frenetic Pony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!