• Advertisement

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

WGL's

This topic is 6002 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement
WGL is nothing more than a wrapper for the OS specific functionality for OpenGL. You can replace WGL, for example, to XGL to make the same stuff work under UNIX! WGL isn''t a bad thing - it just hides OS specific functionality from the developer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Shag
WGL is nothing more than a wrapper for the OS specific functionality for OpenGL. You can replace WGL, for example, to XGL to make the same stuff work under UNIX! WGL isn''t a bad thing - it just hides OS specific functionality from the developer.

1. There is no XGL. There is a GLX though.
2. Some of the functions you may be able to do that with, but not a lot. GLX has a lot that WGL doesn''t, and vice versa.

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK ... my mistake! lol ... Not being a UNIX programmer I was guessing!

GLX can be used instead og WGL in many circumstances ... I agree that they''re not totally interchangable, but the general idea was right! And this brings me on to my next point - it''s about time that the ARB standardized these functions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Advertisement