• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Normalized Blinn Phong

This topic is 745 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

In the 3rd edition of Real-time rendering, the authors base the specular reflectance off roughness and the fresnel effect:

 

(m+8)/(8pi) * R_F(a_h)cos^m(t_h)

 

 

It seems that for a really large m and where the normal and half vector are close to each other, the result of the above expression will be a large number much greater than 1.  

 

Won't this amplify the amount of reflected specular light?  It's not making sense to me because then won't the reflected light be greater than the incoming light?  How is that possible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
You should read through the section called "BRDF Characteristics" in chapter 7, specifically the part where they cover directional-hemispherical reflectance. This value is the "area under the function" that Hodgman is referring to, and must be <= 1 in order for a BRDF to obey energy conservation. As Hodgman mentioned a BRDF can still return a value > 1 for a particular view direction, as long as the result is still <= 1 after integrating about the hemisphere of possible view directions. Edited by MJP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement