Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
DaOnlyOwner

OpenGL Question about Epic's course notes about Physically based rendering.

This topic is 812 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,
I know there were a lot of talks about this topic, but there are still some things I don't really understand.
 
My goal is to implement Image based lighting and physically based shading.
 
To do this I have to solve the lighting integral.
I am following the Epic Games course notes, but one thing bothers me:

They apply a ME to the equation using Importance sampling. So far so good.
Then they split the sum into two sums and multiply them together so they can be precomputed. This is an approximation however.
 
Why can't you just calculate so that you end up with:
[attachment=33361:CodeCogsEqn.gif]
(Essentially splitting the integral around the sum.)
The first Integral can be precalculated with Spherical harmonics (to which I have a question too, but I might ask that in another post) and is exactly the same as in Epic's presentation.
The second Integral differs from Epic's course notes in that it has Li(l) in it. But that shouldn't be a problem because fspec depends on l too, so it doesn't add up to the dependency count.
In the fragment shader you just look up both textures with the appropriate values and add them together.

Can somebody please help me who had only experience with Phong shaders and OpenGL 2.0 in the past? I don't seem to understand and why it seems so complicated in my eyes.
Thank you very much. DaOnlyOwner
 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Hi,

 

It's impractical to use SH for high freq IBL, as you need a crazy amount of terms. Additionally, Brian's split sum approximation splits the radiance integral into two parts - one which can be stored in a cube map and second which can be stored in a small 2D texture (this is why there is no L(i) term in the second equation). Anyway, I'm not sure what are you trying to calculate here, as your equations look quite strange - e.g. f(l,v) term is missing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!