DX11 HLSL race condition when writing to shared memory passed to function

Recommended Posts

I have code like this:

groupshared uint tempData[ElementsCount];

void CSMain(uint3 gID: SV_GroupID, uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID)
{
tempData[gtID.x] = 0;
}


And it works fine. Now I change it to this:

void MyFunc(inout uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID, inout uint inputData[ElementsCount])
{
inputData[gtID.x] = 0;
}

groupshared uint tempData[ElementsCount];

void CSMain(uint3 gID: SV_GroupID, uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID)
{
MyFunc(gtID, tempData);
}


and I get "error X3695: race condition writing to shared memory detected, consider making this write conditional.". Any way to go around this?

Share on other sites

Based on a quick search I found these:

http://xboxforums.create.msdn.com/forums/t/63981.aspx

Based on those it sounds like there might be a bug in certain versions of the compiler. I'd suggest trying to use either command line fxc.exe or a more recent version of the d3dcompiler dll to see if it makes any difference.

Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I stumbled upon those threads as well and it's not it.

Also, I'm not really sure how to update my d3dcompiler. I'm using Windows 10 so I presume it gets updated automatically. Although I use Visual Studio 2013 so I cannot really be sure if the most up-to-date dll is used.

I found out that the problem appears even in this code:

static const int ElementsCount = 512;

groupshared uint tempData[2 * ElementsCount];

void MyFunc(inout uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID, inout uint inputData[2 * ElementsCount])
{

}

void CSMain(uint3 gID: SV_GroupID, uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID)
{
MyFunc(gtID, tempData);
}


Note that I don't even write anything to tempData in MyFunc.
I also found out the problem goes away if I remove the "inout" modifier but then the array just gets copied probably as the code doesn't work as expected.

Edited by maxest

Share on other sites

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/chuckw/2012/05/07/hlsl-fxc-and-d3dcompile/ explains all the details of how the compiler DLL works.

If you want to check which version of the DLL your program is using, then just pause it in the debugger and look through the modules window for the DLL. I believe the latest version is D3dcompiler_47.dll

Have you tried compiling the shader using fxc.exe?

Share on other sites

Yeah, I have D3dcompiler_47.dll indeed.

I did try. Forgot to mention that in previous post. The same problem persists.

Share on other sites

There is many version of d3dcompiler_47.dll, a very dumb ideaâ€¦

If your shader just compile from visual studio as a hlsl source file, the fxc and dll you use is probably bound to the windows sdk that is setup in your project.

Not saying that getting the latest one would solve this, but you may still run an outdated compiler :)

Share on other sites

I've reproduced the behaviour, and simplified the case that goes wrong. Here's my minimal failing case:

groupshared uint tempData[1];

void MyFunc(inout uint inputData[1])
{
}

void CSMain()
{
MyFunc(tempData);
}


It looks like just passing the argument to the function is enough to make it fail to compile.

Here's a workaround for the problem - don't pass the array as a function argument:

#define ElementsCount 256

groupshared uint tempData[ElementsCount];

void MyFunc(in uint3 gtID)
{
tempData[gtID.x] = 0;
}

void CSMain(uint3 gID: SV_GroupID, uint3 gtID: SV_GroupThreadID)
{
MyFunc(gtID);
}


Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm perfectly aware of that workaround and I do it this way. But because I can't pass a shared memory array to function I can't make the function more general. Instead I need to copy it to a few files I use it in.

Share on other sites

I found a better workaround. So simple I can't imagine how I could had not come up with it before. I just used macro.

Still, would be nice if this bug was fixed. In the meantime I will be using macros on functions getting shared buffers as input.

Share on other sites

In the latest Xbox compiler the alleged race condition is just a warning rather than an error like it is in the 15063 Windows SDK. I've added a bug to make sure it's neither.

Create an account

Register a new account

• Partner Spotlight

• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
627638
• Total Posts
2978327
• Similar Content

• hi,
i have read very much about the binding of a constantbuffer to a shader but something is still unclear to me.
e.g. when performing :   vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer,  slot )
is the buffer bound
or
b. to the VertexShader that is currently set as the active VertexShader
Is it possible to bind a constantBuffer to a VertexShader e.g. VS_A and keep this binding even after the active VertexShader has changed ?
I mean i want to bind constantbuffer_A  to VS_A, an Constantbuffer_B to VS_B  and  only use updateSubresource without using setConstantBuffer command every time.

Look at this example:
perform drawcall       ( buffer_A is used )

perform drawcall   ( buffer_B is used )
perform drawcall   (now which buffer is used ??? )

I ask this question because i have made a custom render engine an want to optimize to
the minimum  updateSubresource, and setConstantbuffer  calls

• I got a quick question about buffers when it comes to DirectX 11. If I bind a buffer using a command like:
IASetVertexBuffers IASetIndexBuffer VSSetConstantBuffers PSSetConstantBuffers  and then later on I update that bound buffer's data using commands like Map/Unmap or any of the other update commands.
Do I need to rebind the buffer again in order for my update to take effect? If I dont rebind is that really bad as in I get a performance hit? My thought process behind this is that if the buffer is already bound why do I need to rebind it? I'm using that same buffer it is just different data

• I am really stuck with something that should be very simple in DirectX 11.
1. I can draw lines using a PC (position, colored) vertices and a simple shader just fine.
2. I can draw 3D triangles using PCN (position, colored, normal) vertices just fine (even transparency and SpecularBlinnPhong shaders).

However, if I'm using my 3D shader, and I want to draw my PC lines in the same scene how can I do that?

If I change my lines to PCN and pass them to the 3D shader with my triangles, then the lighting screws them all up.  I only want the lighting for the 3D triangles, but no SpecularBlinnPhong/Lighting for the lines (just PC).
I am sure this is because if I change the lines to PNC there is not really a correct "normal" for the lines.
I assume I somehow need to draw the 3D triangles using one shader, and then "switch" to another shader and draw the lines?  But I have no clue how to use two different shaders in the same scene.  And then are the lines just drawn on top of the triangles, or vice versa (maybe draw order dependent)?
I must be missing something really basic, so if anyone can just point me in the right direction (or link to an example showing the implementation of multiple shaders) that would be REALLY appreciated.

I'm also more than happy to post my simple test code if that helps as well!

• By Reitano
Hi,
I am writing a linear allocator of per-frame constants using the DirectX 11.1 API. My plan is to replace the traditional constant allocation strategy, where most of the work is done by the driver behind my back, with a manual one inspired by the DirectX 12 and Vulkan APIs.
In brief, the allocator maintains a list of 64K pages, each page owns a constant buffer managed as a ring buffer. Each page has a history of the N previous frames. At the beginning of a new frame, the allocator retires the frames that have been processed by the GPU and frees up the corresponding space in each page. I use DirectX 11 queries for detecting when a frame is complete and the ID3D11DeviceContext1::VS/PSSetConstantBuffers1 methods for binding constant buffers with an offset.
The new allocator appears to be working but I am not 100% confident it is actually correct. In particular:
1) it relies on queries which I am not too familiar with. Are they 100% reliable ?
2) it maps/unmaps the constant buffer of each page at the beginning of a new frame and then writes the mapped memory as the frame is built. In pseudo code:
BeginFrame:
page.data = device.Map(page.buffer)
device.Unmap(page.buffer)
RenderFrame
Alloc(size, initData)
...
memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
Alloc(size, initData)
...
memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
(Note: calling Unmap at the end of a frame prevents binding the mapped constant buffers and triggers an error in the debug layer)
Is this valid ?
3) I don't fully understand how many frames I should keep in the history. My intuition says it should be equal to the maximum latency reported by IDXGIDevice1::GetMaximumFrameLatency, which is 3 on my machine. But, this value works fine in an unit test while on a more complex demo I need to manually set it to 5, otherwise the allocator starts overwriting previous frames that have not completed yet. Shouldn't the swap chain Present method block the CPU in this case ?
4) Should I expect this approach to be more efficient than the one managed by the driver ? I don't have meaningful profile data yet.
Is anybody familiar with the approach described above and can answer my questions and discuss the pros and cons of this technique based on his experience ?
For reference, I've uploaded the (WIP) allocator code at https://paste.ofcode.org/Bq98ujP6zaAuKyjv4X7HSv.  Feel free to adapt it in your engine and please let me know if you spot any mistakes
Thanks
Stefano Lanza

• Hey all. I've been working with compute shaders lately, and was hoping to build out some libraries to reuse code. As a prerequisite for my current project, I needed to sort a big array of data in my compute shader, so I was going to implement quicksort as a library function. My implementation was going to use an inout array to apply the changes to the referenced array.

I spent half the day yesterday debugging in visual studio before I realized that the solution, while it worked INSIDE the function, reverted to the original state after returning from the function.

My hack fix was just to inline the code, but this is not a great solution for the future.  Any ideas? I've considered just returning an array of ints that represents the sorted indices.

• 10
• 12
• 22
• 13
• 34