Opinions and suggestions wanted :)

Recommended Posts

Beacon    127

Hello, I'm in the process of writing down a large project into a mind map (and testing the suitability of these features in Unity) and I would love to hear the views of other people interested in game design and perhaps more experienced in game design than I am. I will keep it short since all the information about the games design is in the mind map, but I just want to mention that it's an "immersive sim survival game" with a high focus on collaboration with NPCs. Small disclaimer, the mind map is rather big, around 8 pages worth of text.

Any feedback on any of the mechanics, suggestions for improvements or additions would be greatly appreciated. Also the issue of death is still something I am not quite sure on how to do, I want something new and novel and not just the same old re-spawn system, the only two alternatives I can come up with is permanent death or that you continue playing as one of the NPCs you have around you when you die, but this feels very lacking since it's a survival game and death should really mean something, does anyone out there have a new and novel way of how to tackle death? :/

This is also meant to be presented to a team of people so if anything is unclear I would be very happy if you told me :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would really like to give you feedback, however, I do not have the time to go through all that document.

I would suggest presenting smaller parts of the game, and starting with summarizing the concept of the game, as this mind map is really big to read, and it would take a really long time to properly get through it to provide you with adapted feedback. 

Additionally, for the presentation, I would suggest writing a word document, that is easier to read and more structured, so that you can introduce the game, and then each system and mechanic one by one.

Finally, I would start by summarizing the concept of the game, and what makes it unique,  into a 1 minute pitch, and once the people are hooked on it, then delve deeper into the details of the gameplay.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Plast    0

Hey! Looked through your mindmap and at a glance I think it sounds really cool. This genre is sorely in need of innovative AI since most survival games are PvP or just mindless monsters and really disconnected friendlies.

I really like how you have thought about the AI system, the relationship-part probably needs some love but the GOP, and the chat system and how you plan to set up all the parameters are really interesting, I hope you continue to post or give a link so we can see how that goes.

Your question about death, I have always felt that either just respawning or hardcore death feels really un-immersive. I'd really like to see something along the way of your respawn is as a lone wanderer coming into the "society" that you as a player has been a part of or perhaps built. Whereas you'd wander upon your old inventory or something like that. But all relashionships should be gone and depending on settings (difficulty or mode) you could be more or less trusted.

Generally it sounds as you have great ideas about movement, damage, hunger, action, crafting al all mechanics. To implement them will be quite the challange but I wish you the best of luck!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beacon    127
23 hours ago, Plast said:

 I'd really like to see something along the way of your respawn is as a lone wanderer coming into the "society" that you as a player has been a part of or perhaps built. Whereas you'd wander upon your old inventory or something like that. But all relashionships should be gone and depending on settings (difficulty or mode) you could be more or less trusted.

That is a great idea :D I never really thought about how much of an impact resetting the relationships would have, and it gives a much more deep and realistic strategy for keeping the society you built together, since if you build a very closed and hostile society to keep yourself safe from other players and other hostile NPC's you'll not be able to get back into the society yourself if you die :) That's  so much cooler than just loosing your inventory, you might literally have created your worst enemy since the society will keep going and if you've created a society bent on "world domination" who go out looking for survivors and keep them as slaves once you die you will be battling that society that you made. Brilliant idea :D

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By JRGarcia
      Hello. I would like to ask you all:
      What are the features that a program/library/module needs to have to be called a 'game engine' I have been working for years on my little and still very incomplete Python 3D engine and I found today that it is not mentioned in any list of engines! While this has the advantage of not adding pressure on me, it still feels a little wrong. I'm thinking that it is ignored because it still lacks something very important that prevent it from being considered a real game engine., but I don't see what. Right now it features:
      Forward Rendering with OpenGL 3.2 GPU Animations Sounds Physics Cross platform windowing Totally incomplete GUI (Panel, Image, Label) Lights Full screen effects system (none included) Plug-in system (None included) The beginning of an Editor What do you think it needs, besides more work on what it already has? Thanks.
    • By ilovegames
      Score points by shooting enemies! Before you is one of the best representatives of the simulator sniper games genre, with stunning graphics, quality effects, and realistic ballistics of bullets. It will not be easy to win for sure. Are you ready? Then take a sniper rifle and fight!

    • By suliman
      I've been making games as a hobby for a long time, but it was some years since I actually finished a project. This is slightly frustrating, and I guess a pretty common problem for someone who isnt pushed by deadlines and economy to finish projects.
      I have typically at least 4 more active projects at any time (and many more games I've started but pretty much never touch any more). My projects are all fairly ambitious (but not impossible to finish, all are 2d for example) as I don't find working on very simple games fun.
      I think projects often loose pace after a while and I just gets fed up with that particular project/setting and it's just more rewarding to start a new one. I have too many ideas I want to realise (or sometimes just prototype). Do you have the same experience? Any advice?
      Thanks a bunch!
    • By greentiger
      Right now I'm designing a fantasy tactical turn based game. Originally the game was inspired by Vandal Hearts ( for reference see ).
      As it was inspired by Vandal Hearts I currently have the class and unit progression using points (damage, for example is the [ unit's Phys.Att. + weapon Phys.Att ] - [ defender's Phys.Def + defender's armor Phys.Def ] = base damage (minimum damage is 0) + 1-6; it has a rock-paper-scissors type class superiority ring.
      The challenge I'm facing is this is extremely difficult for me to balance.
      I've been considering the possibility of changing the character progression system to something along the lines where level/rank unlocks class tree abilities (sort of like a mix of WoW skill trees and X-COM) -- and then having weapons do base damage with variable damage like from Terror from the Deep (damage * (0.5 .. 1.5)); I would like to keep the rock-paper-scissors balance where skills chosen determine the unit's class and access to weapons. -- you know writing it down makes it sound more similar to the modern XCOM system.
      I've already redone spells so that they are more like the modern XCOM's abilities with cooldowns and limited uses per combat session.
      Any suggestions and/or tips would greatly be appreciated! Is the Vandal Hearts point type system a sacred cow or is a more XCOM-ish system workable and fun for a fantasy tactics game? Please reply in-thread as I have it set to receive notifications.
    • By sergamer1
      Hi guys,
      So I've been having some trouble with loading fonts in Android (using the NDK).  I've successfully (I believe) compiled the FreeType library as a shared-object library next to some other libraries I am using plus my game/framework code.  I am using the following commands to get things initialised.
      FT_Library ft; FT_Face face; FT_Init_FreeType(&ft); FT_New_Face(ft, filename.c_str(), 0, &face); This is what the FreeType tutorials (plus other various online pages) suggest using to get things going.  When I run this code on my Linux laptop, it runs fine but if I run it on Android, it fails on the fourth line loading in the font.  So I know the library is probably compiled and linked correctly or it would fail on the first or third line right?
      The other issue is where to put the ttf file.  I've put it in the assets subdirectory, which is again where (almost) everyone online suggests putting it.  Some suggest putting it in assets/fonts sub-directory which I tried (and didn't work) and also res/font (which ndk-build complained about while compiling so definitely doesn't work).  I'm a little stuck now since I feel like I've exhausted all the obvious options so if someone with experience using FreeType on the NDK can tell me the magic formula for getting this to work, I'll be very grateful :-)  .  Thanks
  • Popular Now