Sign in to follow this  

Connect Centroids / Dynamic Medium

Recommended Posts

 

Hello,

I have been here about 2 months ago with my Dynamic Foam project and got help from a developer but we ran into some problems connecting centroids to establish a network between the 'foam bubbles'. 

Here is some extra information for why those centroids need to be connected and form a network along with the problem explained at the end.

I. Dynamic Medium
II. Fields and Boids
III. From Boids to a PBD Network
IV. From Curling Motion to Strings
V. Position Based Dynamics (PBD)
VI. The Problem

--

I. Dynamic Medium

The goal of this project is to create a kind on a Zero-player game, a bit like Conway's Game of Life, where cells fluctuate based on surrounding cells, and where the goal to generate Knots within a Dynamic Medium.

To get a sense of such a dynamic network think of a foam with bubbles (volumes) where a micro-fluid runs through the edges (currents). These currents move from high to low pressure, forming circuits. The intensity of the fluid passing the bubbles can make the bubbles shrink or expand. Some currents will be able to line up and form closed circuits. 
 
In 2D these structures are simple loops, in 3D these loops can form strings, and in a next step these strings form again closed-circuits -> knots.

foam_network_knots.jpg

--

II. Fields and Boids

One way to get a model of bubbles and currents going was by using Boid-particles and Fields, which was tried in Processing. Here are short clips to show the interaction:

http://imgur.com/a/Mp0SG 
https://vimeo.com/user37290268

A. In the first clip the Fields (red circles) keep their size while the small particles flow in between and form a circuit.

Stable.png

B. In the second version the size of the Fields is influenced by the number of particles within. This gives rise to a dynamic foam with Fields fluctuating. Expand <-> Shrink

chaos.png

--

III. From Boids to a PBD Network

The problem with using Boids is that they have their limitations whereby the quick expansion of Fields causes the particles to be splattered around, interrupting the steady current. (stable flow vs. splashed around)

SteadyWild.png

Keeping the Boid-particles flowing is important, because a flow-circuit gives rise to organisational rules such as flows going against each other block each other, others can go along and strengthen each other, similar to an electronic circuit:

circuit_1.jpg

So to fix these problems a move to PBD was made and hoping to create a network model (nodes/edges) that replaces the small particles.

The flow replaced by edges:

Flow_2.png

Fields expanding and shrinking depending on the amount of flow through the edges:

Flow_1.png

• Having two Fields A.B. and in between from point a. to b. an edge.
• This edges (a.b.) can replace all the boids moving in between (A.B.)
• Edge (a.b.) can represents 1 or 1 million small particles or more, simplification.
• Between Field A. and B. a measurement of tension •-VVVVV-•  (A/B)
• The more tension between (A.B.) the less flow there can be in (a.b.)
• Inverse the more flow there is in (a.b.) the less tension between (A.B.)
• The edge (a.b.) runs through the Fields A. and B, cooling or heating up Fields A. and B.
• Through edge (a.b.) runs a current the larger this current the bigger the Fields A. and B. become, expansion vs. shrinking, hot vs. cold, condense vs. vaporise.

Shrink2.jpg

The inspiration for the move to 'Position Based Dynamics' came from a talk by Jos Stam where he explained a method explicit on position and using springs:

http://www.birs.ca/events/2014/5-day-workshops/14w5147/videos/watch/201402191414-Stam.html
http://www.birs.ca//workshops//2014/14w5147/files/Stam-BIRS-2014.pdf

JosStam_Nucleus_PBD.jpg

--

IV. From Curling Motion to Strings

At the basis of this Dynamic Foam is the idea to get the bubbles moving through the medium based on self regulated currents between the bubbles:

bubble.jpeg

The mechanics are like a sliding-puzzle where the parts can move to where there is space (created):

SlidingPuzzle.jpg

Space can be created by letting the bubbles shrink on one side and expand on the other, so they can move into that created space, and as a result we get fluctuations and a rolling-curling-motion:

Roll_Flow_bubbles.gif

Here is a fun animation that is similar to the idea: 
https://imgur.com/gallery/xIUGOd9

Roll.jpg

But for those lemons the input-force is gravity, in my model it are the micro-fluid-currents that effect the size. If the fluid is colder than the bubble than it will condensate and the field will expand; when it is warmer the field will vaporise and shrink. The dynamic curing motion from above, could also turn around and close-loop into knots:

Curling1.jpg

In 3D the wind up curls would be like these folk dansers waving strings:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvE5yt83WPU (at 1:44)

strings.jpg

These strings can turn into knots etc. etc.

--

V. Position Based Dynamics (PBD)

For a look at the current situation you can check this short clip, where a small network is in place based on centroids, and where the volumes can fluctuate:

http://imgur.com/QSG71hW

Dynamics.jpg

Here is are the project files on GitHub if you would like to have a closer look:
https://github.com/VirtualOrganics/PBD_DynamicFoam_Files
https://github.com/InteractiveComputerGraphics/PositionBasedDynamics (The PDB software)

--

VI. The Problem

We took the PBD software from GitHub and modified the Demo example called 'GenericConstraintsDemos'. All constraints are taken out except the distance constraint , and the simulation is limited to work on a 2D plane with the intention of extending to 3D eventually. Check out the graph:

circles1.jpg

As you can see in the example, there are nine circles. The simulation allows for any number of circles. The green dots represent the centers of the circles; the red dots represent the centroids of the three adjacent/connected circles; the black dots represent some (outer) intersections between circles; and the blue lines connect either centroids with other centroids, or centroids to intersections in a particular pattern. In the simulation, the radii of the circles can change and, since a distance constraint is applied, the varying sizes of the circles causes the locations (and existence) of the dots and lines to change.

The code at this point is able to identify/calculate the locations of the black dots and the red dots, but he had trouble coming up with an algorithm that correctly connects the red and black dots. The diagram above shows the correct connections, but coming up with an algorithm to do this automatically and as the simulation runs stalled our progress.

So I'm now looking for a developer who can take it to the next level. It doesn't necessarily need to be in PBD an other Physics Engine (Bullet?) might do the job, one where on top of the physics-interactions a network-formula can balance out the weights and regulate the system.

All suggestions and questions are more than welcome!

Best,
m.

Edited by Chelle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628647
    • Total Posts
      2984034
  • Similar Content

    • By AtherKhan
      Hi guys,
      So I have an AI game in mind and I was wondering what are the best ways or techniques to sell my idea of my prototype and proof of concept. Should I make a trailer? Should make a magazine style book? Should I make a video in talking about my game like they do in Kickstarter campaigns? Any feedback would be highly appreciated!
    • By Luqman Ibrahim
      Hello guys, I just registered this site and heard from my lecturer that this a good site to talk about certain topics since my research topic are mostly programmer who are experienced with AI can answer the survey.
       
      The reason of the survey below is to understand which is suitable solution for 2d platformer pathfinding for AI and which one is easier to implement for 2D platformer. 
       
      I would appreciate if you guys give your responses for the survey link shared and thank you for spending time answering the survey. Sorry if the survey is a bit hard to understand, I tried to make it understandable as best as I can. Again, thank you!
       
      https://goo.gl/forms/S0etAlAAHL6S5kTI2
    • By karthikaqpt
      NVIDIA has developed a new machine learning methodology for generating unique and realistic looking faces using GAN i-e Generative Adversarial Network. The GAN is not a new technology, but where NVIDIA differentiates is through the progressive training method it developed. The key idea is to grow both the generator and discriminator progressively: starting from a low resolution, they add new layers that model increasingly fine details as training progresses. This both speeds the training up and greatly stabilizes it, allowing them to produce images of unprecedented quality. NVIDIA took a database of photographs of famous people and used that to train its system. By working together, the neural networks were able to produce fake images that are nearly indistinguishable from real human photographs.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2edOMMREazo
    • By turanszkij
      Hi,
      Tile based renderers are quite popular nowadays, like tiled deferred, forward+ and clustered renderers. There is a presentation about GPU based particle systems from AMD. What particularly interest me is the tile based rendering part. The basic idea is, that leave the rasterization pipeline when rendering billboards and do it in a compute shader instead, much like Forward+. You determine tile frustums, cull particles, sort front to back, then render them until the accumulated alpha value is below 1. The performance results at the end of the slides seems promising. Has anyone ever implemented this? Was it a success, is it worth doing? The front to back rendering is the most interesting part in my opinion, because overdraw can be eliminated for alpha blending.
      The demo is sadly no longer available..
    • By CanisTk
      Hi everyone, I'm new to learning AI pathfinding, although R&D for 3 month... so here is the problem that I had, hope there are someone can give me some advice.
      I was trying to develop my Flight Agent in 3D space. and store all the obstacles reference into octree.
      so I got the space & obstacle distribution represent in octree already, however I wanted to implement
      1) Navigation network graph region (to define the space in region)
      2) HPA* , to implement the high level path finding based on simplify network graph
      the major issue : 
      I know how to collect all remain space from octree node, but I didn't know how to segment the space, and build up a network graph based on it.
       
       
  • Popular Now