How powerful/extensible is the godot engine for programmers?

Recommended Posts

After looking around at game engines the other day I came across the godot engine. From what I could gather, it seemed to be the most programmer friendly engine in that it allows you to script natively (GDnative) and even extend engine functionality through C++ 'modules' (as described here). Being a C++ programmer I like to have full control over my game and how it runs but I don't necessarily want to start from scratch and godot seems like a good middle ground. However, when looking at the pros and cons of the godot engine I found this site which lists a con for godot as difficult to optimize since:

Quote

Godot has an OOP architecture. Everything is an object internally and data is spread among many classes, thus it's difficult to optimize (i.e. not cache friendly, difficuly to vectorize or paralellize, etc). Read about "Data Oriented Design" for more info about the problems and solutions.

I'm curios if anyone has any experience creating modules with godot and what exactly their limitations are in regards to optimization/control over your game code. According to godot's author you even have the ability to utilize a different renderer through modules making me believe that even though godot has something resembling an OOP architecture at its core, you can still implement a data oriented render engine if you so pleased. 

 

Edited by boagz57

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I briefly tried to use Godot.

It looks like an interesting attempt at creating a free 3D game engine. It's one of the first to support the modern workflow as pioneered by Unity and Unreal. But I think that that it is it's only strong point: It's free. If this is important to you, then you should look at Godot. A free game engine can solve alot of licensing problems...

At the moment, I did not see it to have any other advantage over Unity and Unreal. If you are content with their licenses, don't bother with Godot (yet). Maybe in the future it will become better.

What type of control are you looking for, that is not provided in your other frameworks, and what are you trying to optimise?

Edited by SillyCow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unity is effectively free. So long as you make less than 100,000 dollars with Unity you can use Personal edition however you want. If you start making over 100k a year with your unity products, that is when you have to buy a license. You aren't going to make this much money with your first game, so you don't have to pay anything. If you do happen to release a major hit for your first game... you just made 100k, so you can definitely afford it. :P It's a good problem to have. 

Give Unity a try. I feel like it's extremely developer friendly.

- Eck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Eck said:

If you start making over 100k a year with your unity products

The new license is different. It basically means that any small company with money needs to get a license. It doesn't matter if your game has made any money or not. This is a pain point for me, because I used to use unity professionally for multimedia demos. I think that any company that does not work out of a garage has 100k in funding or revenue. $100k is less than the average pay for two software developers... So while unity is free for hobbyists (and is awesome!), it is no longer free for any professional dev.

This is especially painful if you plan on making VR prototypes, as unity is great for VR, but VR prototypes rarely generate revenue.

If your company currently makes more than $100k in annual gross revenues or has raised funds in excess of $100k, you are not permitted to use Unity Personal, for prototyping or otherwise, as defined in our EULA Agreement. You may use Unity Plus for up to $200k in annual gross revenues, or Unity Pro with an unlimited revenue or fundraising capacity.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628688
    • Total Posts
      2984243
  • Similar Content

    • By lawnjelly
      It comes that time again when I try and get my PC build working on Android via Android Studio. All was going swimmingly, it ran in the emulator fine, but on my first actual test device (Google Nexus 7 2012 tablet (32 bit ARM Cortex-A9, ARM v7A architecture)) I was getting a 'SIGBUS illegal alignment' crash.
      My little research has indicated that while x86 is fine with loading 16 / 32 / 64 bit values from any byte address in memory, the earlier ARM chips may need data to be aligned to the data size. This isn't a massive problem, and I see the reason for it (probably faster, like SIMD aligned loads, and simpler for the CPU). I probably have quite a few of these, particular in my own byte packed file formats. I can adjust the exporter / formats so that they are using the required alignment.
      Just to confirm, if anyone knows this, is it all 16 / 32 / 64 bit accesses that need to be data size aligned on early android devices? Or e.g. just 64 bit size access? 
      And is there any easy way to get the compiler to spit out some kind of useful information as to the alignment of each member of a struct / class, so I can quickly pin down the culprits?
      The ARM docs (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.faqs/ka15414.html) suggest another alternative is using a __packed qualifier. Anyone used this, is this practical?
    • By Josheir
      In the following code:

       
      Point p = a[1]; center of rotation for (int i = 0; I<4; i++) { int x = a[i].x - p.x; int y = a[i].y - p.y; a[i].x = y + p.x; a[i].y = - x + p.y; }  
      I am understanding that a 90 degree shift results in a change like:   
      xNew = -y
      yNew = x
       
      Could someone please explain how the two additions and subtractions of the p.x and p.y works?
       
      Thank you,
      Josheir
    • By alex1997
      Hey, I've a minor problem that prevents me from moving forward with development and looking to find a way that could solve it. Overall, I'm having a sf::VertexArray object and looking to reander a shader inside its area. The problem is that the shader takes the window as canvas and only becomes visible in the object range which is not what I'm looking for.. 
      Here's a stackoverflow links that shows the expected behaviour image. Any tips or help is really appreciated. I would have accepted that answer, but currently it does not work with #version 330 ...
    • By noodleBowl
      I just finished up my 1st iteration of my sprite renderer and I'm sort of questioning its performance.
      Currently, I am trying to render 10K worth of 64x64 textured sprites in a 800x600 window. These sprites all using the same texture, vertex shader, and pixel shader. There is basically no state changes. The sprite renderer itself is dynamic using the D3D11_MAP_WRITE_NO_OVERWRITE then D3D11_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD when the vertex buffer is full. The buffer is large enough to hold all 10K sprites and execute them in a single draw call. Cutting the buffer size down to only being able to fit 1000 sprites before a draw call is executed does not seem to matter / improve performance.  When I clock the time it takes to complete the render method for my sprite renderer (the only renderer that is running) I'm getting about 40ms. Aside from trying to adjust the size of the vertex buffer, I have tried using 1x1 texture and making the window smaller (640x480) as quick and dirty check to see if the GPU was the bottleneck, but I still get 40ms with both of those cases. 

      I'm kind of at a loss. What are some of the ways that I could figure out where my bottleneck is?
      I feel like only being able to render 10K sprites is really low, but I'm not sure. I'm not sure if I coded a poor renderer and there is a bottleneck somewhere or I'm being limited by my hardware

      Just some other info:
      Dev PC specs: GPU: Intel HD Graphics 4600 / Nvidia GTX 850M (Nvidia is set to be the preferred GPU in the Nvida control panel. Vsync is set to off) CPU: Intel Core i7-4710HQ @ 2.5GHz Renderer:
      //The renderer has a working depth buffer //Sprites have matrices that are precomputed. These pretransformed vertices are placed into the buffer Matrix4 model = sprite->getModelMatrix(); verts[0].position = model * verts[0].position; verts[1].position = model * verts[1].position; verts[2].position = model * verts[2].position; verts[3].position = model * verts[3].position; verts[4].position = model * verts[4].position; verts[5].position = model * verts[5].position; //Vertex buffer is flaged for dynamic use vertexBuffer = BufferModule::createVertexBuffer(D3D11_USAGE_DYNAMIC, D3D11_CPU_ACCESS_WRITE, sizeof(SpriteVertex) * MAX_VERTEX_COUNT_FOR_BUFFER); //The vertex buffer is mapped to when adding a sprite to the buffer //vertexBufferMapType could be D3D11_MAP_WRITE_NO_OVERWRITE or D3D11_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD depending on the data already in the vertex buffer D3D11_MAPPED_SUBRESOURCE resource = vertexBuffer->map(vertexBufferMapType); memcpy(((SpriteVertex*)resource.pData) + vertexCountInBuffer, verts, BYTES_PER_SPRITE); vertexBuffer->unmap(); //The constant buffer used for the MVP matrix is updated once per draw call D3D11_MAPPED_SUBRESOURCE resource = mvpConstBuffer->map(D3D11_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD); memcpy(resource.pData, projectionMatrix.getData(), sizeof(Matrix4)); mvpConstBuffer->unmap(); Vertex / Pixel Shader:
      cbuffer mvpBuffer : register(b0) { matrix mvp; } struct VertexInput { float4 position : POSITION; float2 texCoords : TEXCOORD0; float4 color : COLOR; }; struct PixelInput { float4 position : SV_POSITION; float2 texCoords : TEXCOORD0; float4 color : COLOR; }; PixelInput VSMain(VertexInput input) { input.position.w = 1.0f; PixelInput output; output.position = mul(mvp, input.position); output.texCoords = input.texCoords; output.color = input.color; return output; } Texture2D shaderTexture; SamplerState samplerType; float4 PSMain(PixelInput input) : SV_TARGET { float4 textureColor = shaderTexture.Sample(samplerType, input.texCoords); return textureColor; }  
      If anymore info is needed feel free to ask, I would really like to know how I can improve this assuming I'm not hardware limited
    • By John Mckrugins
      My short-term  goal right now is a job as a Junior Programmer in any game company, just to get my foot int the door and start earning some income.
      My long term goal is to Programme for bigger more established  game companies and help games that interest me.
      Im in semi-fortunate position where i don't have to work a full time job so i have the  learn how to programme.
      i did my research into whats a good beginner way to start,  Unity and C# came up a lot, so i threw my hat in.
      For the past 5 months i've been learning C# and Unity using the udemy tutorials at a slow but steady pace as i come from a 0 maths/ programming background.
      Right now  getting the hang of things , understanding most code and the  unity engine to a point where i feel comfortable at my current level around Beginner/ Intermediate.
      Although im still keen to continue with Unity, I cant help this nagging feeling that(lets say for arguments sake i do actually get a job) if i do peruse this path and end up with a job as a developer for a company that uses Unity or whatever else uses C# . There is going to be a point at however many X years down the line i am, im still using unity,  im going to be in a position where i want to work on bigger more mainstream games that use C++.
      I want to get a job ASAP, i know it will take at the very least another 7 months probably, learning more code, making a portfolio and all the rest, so i dont really want to change and start from scratch again.
      Im not bashing unity but it looks like its main use is mobile games, which would be perfectly fine as a starting point, but not as a long term career. 
      Hypothetically  If i continue to focus on learning C# / Unity to reach my goal, and at some-point i want to move into bigger prospects and learn C++, how screwed would i be if i wanted to transition over.
      Im by no means a  smart guy that picks up things fast, im just willing to put in the time/effort.
      Should i scrap learning C# and unity for C++ / Unreal  or just power on through and transition later down the line after i get some experience first.
      Time is a factor, but i want to make sure im not condemning myself to a path i wont like later down the line...
       
       
  • Popular Now