• Advertisement

3D D3D9 - How to linearize depth buffer obtained from closed source application

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I hope for help on the following problem - hopefully an easy one for you, but I am an absolute beginner...

I want to simulate a Lidar in a closed source D3D9 game (ArmA2-based I think), meaning I want to get the pixel positions in view space. For that I intercept the D3D9 calls (via proxy dll) and retrieve the handle to the depth buffer texture (R32F) which I have identified .  I've attached an example of the contents of this depth buffer (just StretchRect'ed the contents to the back buffer) and the corresponding rendered image.

Now what I am trying to do is transform the depth buffer values to view space but I keep failing on this. I am trying to do it as described in this stackoverflow post (the only change I made after I saw that it does not work is to delete the first line 'z = depth*2.0 - 1.0' and instead directly using the depth value, because as far as I know the projection matrix(from MSDN: https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/windows/desktop/bb147302(v=vs.85).aspx,IC511470.png, Q = Zf/(Zf-Zn) )is already adjusted to output a depth in [0,1] - and thus should also be directly usable in inverted form for the transformatino from clip space to view space)

I should mention that I can query the game API for the view frustum values (left + right angle, top + bottom angle, near and far plane), but as you can see a large part of the depth buffer is black

So here are my questions:

1) What I don't quite understand is that apparently the whole depth buffer value interval is inverted, meaning far objects are dark (a color of (1,1,1,1) is white) . Are there any other projection matrices commonly used together with D3D9, that have this behavior and which I could try?

2) Is the approach shown in the mentioned stackoverflow post a valid one? Especially I'd really like to know if this division by w after applying the inverse projection matrix is correct - I thought, this division is necessary to get from clip space to normalized device coordinates. But why is it necessary here?

3) Is there any other approach I could use to get the pixel positions in view space?

Thanks in advance!



Edited by Apollo13

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Snaked
      Im working in this project for 1 year .... mostly i develop a tool and databases for make the different maps and now i'm doing the client for play the game
      Tell me if you like it......
      this is a capture of how is viewing atm

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By KarimIO
      Hey guys,
      Are lightmaps still the best way to handle static diffuse irradiance, or is SH used for both diffuse and specular irradiance now?
      Also, do any modern games use direct light in lightmaps, or are all direct lighting handled by shadow maps now?
      Finally, how is SH usually baked?
    • By KarimIO
      Hey guys
      So I was wondering how modern terrain and water geometry works both with and without tesselation. Essentially:
      1) Is Geoclipmapping still the best CPU tesselation technique?
      2) Is Geoclipmapping still used with tesselation?
      3) Is non-tesselated water just flat? Is there any other (reasonable) ways to simulate it? Do people use Geoclipmapping for that too?
    • By Atwo Studios
      Hey guys,

      Anthony here from Atwo Studios bringing you some new updates for the new year!
      In this video I go over our game ROY, the new games and some general updates to the company!

      If you have not checked out ROY feel free to give it a try! Many people have said they enjoyed the game thus far!
      ROY: https://goo.gl/o6JJ5P
  • Advertisement