Advertisement Jump to content
schneckerstein

DX11 Need help implementing NDF-Filtering + LEAN mapping

This topic is 453 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I manged so far to implement NVIDIA's NDF-Filtering at a basic level (the paper can be found here). Here is my code so far:

//...
// project the half vector on the normal (?)
float3 hppWS = halfVector / dot(halfVector, geometricNormal)
float2 hpp = float2(dot(hppWS, wTangent), dot(hppWS, wBitangent));	

// compute the pixel footprint
float2x2 dhduv = float2x2(ddx(hpp), ddy(hpp));

// compute the rectangular area of the pixel footprint
float2 rectFp = min((abs(dhduv[0]) + abs(dhduv[1])) * 0.5, 0.3);

// map the area to ggx roughness 
float2 covMx = rectFp * rectFp * 2;
roughness = sqrt(roughness * roughness + covMx);
//... 

Now I want combine this with LEAN mapping as state in Chapter 5.5 of the NDF paper.

But I struggle to understand what theses sections actually means in Code: 

Quote

To combine this filtering method with our NDF filtering, we do
the following: We first interpret the first-order moments as a regular
shading normal coming from the normal map and perturb the shading
tangent frame with it.

I suppose the first-order moments are the B coefficent of the LEAN map, however things like

float3 hppWS = halfVector / dot(halfVector, float3(lean_B, 0));

doesn't bring up anything usefull.

Next theres:

Quote

We then compute a covariance matrix SIGMA
of the estimated Beckmann distribution (Eq. 5 in [OB10]) and interpret
this as another kernel filter image.png induced by variations of half
vectors caused by the normal map.

This simply means:

// M and B are the coefficents from the LEAN map
float2x2 sigma_mat = float2x2(
  M.x - B.x * B.x, M.z - B.x * B.y,
  M.z - B.x * B.y, M.y - B.y * B.y);

does it?

Finally:

Quote

Finally, using the convolution formulation of NDF filtering from
Eq. 12, we perform a nested convolution

eq21.png

This is the part confuses me the most: how am I suppose to convolute two matrices? I know the concept of convolution in terms of functions, not matrices. Should I multiple them? That didn't make any usefully output.

I hope someone can help with this maybe too specific question, I'm really despaired to make this work and i've spend too many hours of trial & error...

Cheers,

Julian

Edited by schneckerstein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!