• Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By Old Mohave Games Studio
      Bitcoin Survival! An 1-bit graphics charming game made in 5 days for the 2018's Crypto Game Jam. It's a Roguelike Clicker Game in which you must mine bitcoins to buy and upgrade itens in order to survive as long as you can! All assets original made by me. Come play. And, please, share and rate. Any suggestions for the game are welcome too. (ALSO REPORT ME ANY BUGS FOUND)
      DEVLOG. V. 0.2
      - The game has been extensively polished. Many bugs have been fixed and many features have been added to the game. The difficulty has been balanced once again. Maybe I still have to update some things in the tutorial, but that's easy and I will be doing this in the next days. Hope you enjoy the game at this actual stage. It's almost like a new game.
      - It's mobile compatible!
      IF YOU LIKED THE GAME, PLEASE DON'T FORGET TO SHARE AND RATE IT! That would help me a lot.
      https://www.scirra.com/arcade/strategy-games/bitcoin-survival-28765




    • By oranssi
      This is an adult psychedelic fighting game with spirits of the natural elements. 
      Choose your character to represent an anthropomorphic version of the different elements. 
      Earth, fire, air, water and more. There are 28 Archelemental spirits to unlock. 
      Take on challenges to earn more goodies such as sexy content, story modes and even make your own Archelemental to play and to share it with others.
      Download here :
      https://oranssi.itch.io/archelementals-of-eiss

      Trailer :
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmBNu_dPN_Y

    • By Ricardo3Ddev
      Hi guys!
      This is a independent game being produced by me and my brother. We’ve been working on it for about 6 months and we’ve already done a good part of the game. We hope to finalize and make it available on Steam by the end of this year.
      We are using Blender 3D and Gimp software for production.
       
      About the Game: Dongo Adventure will be a 3D platform style game, where the main character (Dongo) is a mouse that ventures through various scenarios (sewers, culverts, streets, electric grid, etc.) and faces several enemies along the way (cockroaches, mosquitoes, spiders, toxic gases, electrical wires, etc.). He carries a basket / backpack with cheeses that he uses to throw and defend himself from enemies, as well as being able to push objects that helps him to overcome obstacles. The ultimate goal will be a surprise!
       
      Now we are developing new scenarios and enemies. We hope to publish news soon...
      Game page on Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/811450/Dongo_Adventure/ - (Teaser UPDATED)
      Dongo Adventure - Indie Game Project (First Teaser) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2nmxtkE0xk
       
      Thanks for following the project!

    • By iradicator
      This is a general question about player controller on a surface that contains geometry (curved roads / slopes, mountains, etc.) and obstacles (walls). The game should simulate a simple physical model (acceleration, collisions, etc.) and the character should navigate convincingly through the terrain. 

      I'm using Unity but I think this is a general question about how to design a character controller.

      I wrote a simple character controller that uses player input to steer the character in the world. wasd keys move forward and turn. Since I'm controlling the character directly, I'm using a kinematic object (I don't even use the rigidbody) and moves it by setting the transform directly to some model I implemented (I have speed, acceleration, mass, etc.)

      Why did I wrote a physical kinematic simulation? I tried to use a rigidbody and apply forces based on player's input directly on it but I found the control felt a little bit "swimmy" and it was hard to tweak (example: the character slammed hard and spun out of control (even when locking xz rotating direction), it took a long time to accelerate, etc.)

      That worked well when during prototyping on a simple plane with no obstacles. Now I have a level with non-even geometry. The problem I have is how to make the players "stick" to the ground when they travel around (Prototype applies movement on the xz plane but doesn't take into account being connected to the floor). Another issue is to set the orientation (up vector) of the player (imagine a vehicle) in a way that looks both smooth and convincing - the vehicle should change its pitch / roll as it's navigating through some slopes. Even the simple example of a  vehicle starting to climb from a plane on a road with a constant slop (say 20 deg) should change the orientation in a convincing manner, i.e. the vehicle should not start to "lift the nose" before touching the ramp, nor should it "sink the nose" colliding into the ramp. Again, this is where the physical engine can come in handy, but when I tried to apply force going up the vehicle slowed down because of friction.

      I also have problems with collisions since I'm moving the character directly by controlling its transform (kinematic), it feels weird and doesn't play well when the physics engine detects collisions and doesn't want to let the character penetrate a wall. It collides well with objects, it just feel very not natural.

      The real questions here are about best approaches to design a character controller (note: that SHOULD be applied also to agents using AI steering algorithms - that also calculates forces or running a model underneath). 

      1. How do you move a character? Are you using the physics engine to do the heavy lifting or you control the character directly like a kinematic object?
      2. If you're using physics, what's the best approach to apply forces? (yes, it depends on the game, but let's say some realistic based physics model with accelerations and forces - let's assume animations don't apply root motion - to simplify) In Unity, there are multiple ways to apply force - relative / non-relative, impulse / continuous etc.
      3, If you're not using physics, how do you make sure that collision detection play nice with your movement algorithms? How do you make collisions look natural and still give the player good control?
      4. Uneven terrain, how do you make the character (let's assume a vehicle - a car - with no complex animations (so no IK in play)) "stick" to the ground while changing its orientation (up vector) in a smooth and convincing manner?
      5. what's the best way to also allow the player to disconnect from the ground? (e.g. either jump or fall off platforms)

      For me, rigidbody vs. kinematic is the key question here. I saw tutorials that use both - but since they were super simple they didn't deal with the problems I mentioned above in depth. I'm wondering what's the best approach for the player controller and would love to hear more points to consider and tips based on your experience. Pseudo code / code samples (in any language / engine) would be much appreciated. Thank you!
    • By FB Fresh
      I would like to know if there are any game developers/ designers who could spare a few minutes for an email/ phone call interview if so please let me know ASAP very much appreciated thank you.
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement

What's missing from TCGs?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement

IMO -- coming from years of MtG and a smattering of digital TCG's -- reduce the luck element. One of my favorite completely unrelated board games is called Dominant Species. It builds out a hex board as the game progresses and there are new cards laid out every round so every game is different, but neither the hexes nor the cards can really provide much of an advantage to any one player.

If you can break through the pattern of just hoping to draw the right cards at the right time, I would be excited to play that game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree! It either makes the game too reliant on luck- though some games like Vanguard cleverly use this as part of their brand- or too reliant on searchers- Yugioh! for example.

 

That said, players WILL abuse a "pick your own" style (nondeckbuilding) TCG, so it's near impossible to design cards in a way that would predict for broken rules. It would certainly require a banlist, which can be unpopular, money-driven, and reactionary.

This is a tough one...

What if players could select from a pool of cards each turn, where near half are visible and the rest aren't?

i.e. each turn the player selects 1 from the top 5 cards where the last 2 are always visible before the selection?

- This would still be luck based but give the player a potential safe option, like walking away with the money you have on a gameshow.

The rest of the cards would be shuffled into the deck, thus shuffling the deck each turn and removing the need for searchers.

- This is because to avoid dead draws or a stacked (players order the deck start to finish as desired, which might be fun as a format) game, you need some randomness. This would also reduce the need for searcher cards.

 

What do you think of that; does it make sense? :)

Thank you Tom and sorry, I'm new to the site. Won't happen again :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a game out there called Spectromancer you may want to take a look at. It's not strictly a TCG; IIRC you always have access to the same pool of cards, but you do build a "deck" of sorts and always have access to your whole deck, then you play cards based on your resources.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelving, I took a look at this and it’s a really interesting design! They really don’t have a hand or graveyard?

 

Tbh I think TCGs will have to evolve by hybridising (like when Conjure TCG added a movement element to the genre), just because of how restrictive the fundamental mechanics can be to both design and the framing device. 

Thats just an opinion though, I want to hear what you think :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are several games out where you build your deck during play from the same pool as your opponent.

Dominion introduced the concept and there have been sequels and competitors since then.(these are no longer TRADING card games)

Eliminating luck, however, in traditional card-games, has always been the job of the deck-builder, often helped by having access to different-but-functionally-the-same cards, hybrid-cards(multiple functions, sometimes one has to be chosen) and search-cards.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always wanted cards that grow with the player. Most TCG games try a leveling system but having cards with a clear advantage over others is always a bad idea.

 

Maybe the cards gain abilities and traits that are equal to starter effects, something like that. Or they lose something when they gain something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For deck building, I would be interested to see digital card games that draw from 'living card games' (LCG) like those that Fantasy Flight have been releasing. This makes the assumption that everyone has access to the same pool of cards during deck building. (They release 20 news cards in affordable packs twice a year, that everyone usually buys).

As for during the game, it's hard to eliminate randomness entirely due to the shuffle -> draw mechanic. 

23 hours ago, Dramolion said:

Eliminating luck, however, in traditional card-games, has always been the job of the deck-builder, often helped by having access to different-but-functionally-the-same cards, hybrid-cards(multiple functions, sometimes one has to be chosen) and search-cards.

I agree here that the deck building portion of games usually helps to mitigate the effects of (bad) luck, but they never quite eliminate it entirely, the deck is still shuffled and drawn.

Strategies to eliminate luck in the core mechanics might include giving all players access to actions relating to deck search and reordering of the draw pile, regardless of the deck they are playing. This would give players more control over what cards they got in their hand and perhaps move the game closer to perfect, albeit partial, information. 

Outside of those thoughts, opening up the mechanics to more hybrid-genre things as mentioned above could work.

Also, I find this of interesting on this topic: http://keithburgun.net/randomness-and-game-design/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Advertisement