#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

# N-Patches for terrain LOD

This topic is 6128 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

Hi, guys! Is somebody there who can help me ? (I apoligise, my english is probably awful, but I hope you''ll be able to understand me) I plan to implement a simple terrain rendering engine in my spare time with DirectX 8. My idea is to use n-patches for terrain LOD generation. Now, be patient and let me explain what is my problem: Ok, let''s say I know how to load a gray-scale bitmap from a file, generate a terrain mesh from it, and compute a quadtree for my visibility detection algorithm. My problem is how to produce various terrain LOD according to the distance from the camera using n-patches. An obvious solution is for every visible quadtree leaf to determine it''s distance to the observer and then compute the tesslation amount (number of segments) for that node, using a formula like this: NumSegments = ((MaxDistance - Distance) * MaxSegments + (Distance - MinDistance) * MinSegments) / (MaxDistance - MinDistance), where: Distance - the distance from the quadtree node to the camera, MinDistance - the distance to the near plane of my view frustum; MaxDistance - the distance to the far plane of my view frustum; MinSegments - the number of segments at the farthest distance; MaxSegments - the number of segments at the nearest distance. Probably the formula is not correct, but I hope you''ve got the main idea. So, my problem is: when rendering adjacent n-patches tesslated with different number of segments it''s most likely to have noticeable seams between them, but I really have no idea how to avoid these seams. May be there is a better solution than mine. Have you got any ideas? Thank you for any suggestions and ideas!

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
Rutin
18
4. 4
JoeJ
14
5. 5

• 14
• 10
• 23
• 9
• 33
• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
632632
• Total Posts
3007541
• ### Who's Online (See full list)

There are no registered users currently online

×