mistake?
Author
if anyone has the book "teach yourself c++ in 21 days - jesse liberty" could you tell me if there is a mistake.....
on pages 26 and 27 look at line 6 of ''listing 2.2'' on page 27 it says that will produce:
The manipulator endl writes a new line to the screen.
however it produces:
The manipulator std::endl writes a new line to the screen.
I just wanna know is the mistake the book or my compiler or what i''m sure it does sound a bit fussy
quote:Original post by garconbifteck
on pages 26 and 27 look at line 6 of 'listing 2.2' on page 27 it says that will produce:
The manipulator endl writes a new line to the screen.
however it produces:
The manipulator std::endl writes a new line to the screen.
That what? There's either a typo in there or English is not your first language, in either case it's ok, I just don't know what you are talking about. If you could be a little more clear about what the problem is I'll try to answer you.
ShadeStorm, the Day_Glo Fish
PS-I'm guessing you are French from the nickname.
Edited by - ShadeStorm on December 28, 2001 5:19:29 PM
Author
hmm, ok.... it says that writing this:
std::cout << "The manipulator std:endl ";
will produce
The manipulator endl
however it produces
The manipulator std::endl
and i think in my own head it is the book writer/publishers mistake... do you get what i mean now?
---
-http://garconbifteck.cjb.net/
-www.pc-gaming.com
Garcon Bifteck
Edited by - garconbifteck on December 28, 2001 5:42:49 PM
std::cout << "The manipulator std:endl ";
will produce
The manipulator endl
however it produces
The manipulator std::endl
and i think in my own head it is the book writer/publishers mistake... do you get what i mean now?
---
-http://garconbifteck.cjb.net/
-www.pc-gaming.com
Garcon Bifteck
Edited by - garconbifteck on December 28, 2001 5:42:49 PM
Darn. They took Teach Yourself C++ in 21 Days off of informit.com''s free library. Oh well...
Anyway, I''m betting that''s just a typo. Doubtlessly, a line as
std::cout << "The manipulator std::endl ";
should be pretty straightforward in its effect. I can''t really tell what you''re asking since you''ve been changing your question and messing up your SRops, but I wouldn''t worry about it too much.
Later,
ZE.
SRops means "scope resolution operators," btw. They look like this:
::
Anyway, I''m betting that''s just a typo. Doubtlessly, a line as
std::cout << "The manipulator std::endl ";
should be pretty straightforward in its effect. I can''t really tell what you''re asking since you''ve been changing your question and messing up your SRops, but I wouldn''t worry about it too much.
Later,
ZE.
SRops means "scope resolution operators," btw. They look like this:
::
Author
typo? publishers mistake? i don''t know what that means
----
This post was officially made by Garcon Bifteck
----
This post was officially made by Garcon Bifteck
Ok, I get it now. Yeah, that''s a typo in the book. Unless one of the characters in question is a backslash, the part in double quotes after the stream insertion operator will come out exactly as typed.
ShadeStorm, the Day_Glo Fish
ShadeStorm, the Day_Glo Fish
Author
Thanks 
thats what i wanted to know , also could you expand on my vocab by telling me what "typo" means!!? :p
thats what i wanted to know , also could you expand on my vocab by telling me what "typo" means!!? :p
A typo is a mistake with typing. If I want to write hello but I write hallo de A is the typo.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
