• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Rene

VESA, is it worth learning???

10 posts in this topic

Is it at all worth learning VESA and dos programming since most future software and games will probably be made to windows with DirectX???
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DOS programming meaning "console" programming is worth it, it''s better to learn C/C++ through a console app than a full Windows app. I still use Win32 Console Apps for small test programs and so on, when I don''t care about the interface.

As for Vesa/VGA, I have a lot of knowledge of DOS graphics programming that I''ll probably never really use anymore. The basic concepts are the same, but you might as well learn the actual implementation with DDraw, which really isn''t that hard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DOS is all but dead. With Win 2000 being released this month it''s only a matter of time before it dissappears completely. I wouldn''t worry about programming Vesa at all. That''s what Direct X and OpenGL are for.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DOS is all but dead. With Win 2000 being released this month it''s only a matter of time before it dissappears completely. I wouldn''t worry about programming Vesa at all. That''s what Direct X and OpenGL are for.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I was experimenting with Linux, I discovered that my videocard wasn''t supported. However, it was VESA compliant and I was actually able to get X up and running I guess I was just surprised to hear the name VESA again. So, if you''re a driver developer, then you''d probably be the only one who''d need to know about VESA. But most game programmers build their engines from others drivers now these days.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Although most of you lot wouldn''t ever need it, it is still very useful to be able to use the VESA and EGA/VGA modes.
You will learn from it easily how to use the video buffers (and pages) and how to make damn fast screen refreshes without using any APIs.
It is also fun when playing with boot disks.
And also with many other operating systems (OS2, MacOS, old DOS/Windows systems) being able to use run DOS based programs, it is still useful for cross-compatibility (I just normally port and recompile it to the other OS though).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, i guess it is DirectX i have to learn. What do i need to do that. Can i use DJGPP(gcc) for DirectX or what? Is there good tutorials avaible on the internet or should i go buy a good book???

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is a package out at electronic stores called Game Programming v3.0 you can get it at electronics boutique or whatever game store you have..
It comes with DX6.1, VC++ 6.0 and Genesis 3D engine. You either need Borland C++ builder or Visual C++, I personally recomend Visual C++ because it is easier I think. VESA is a gory pain in the butt and unless you work for a hardware vendor and are creating drivers or if your really interested in knowing the ins and outs of PC''s don''t do it! At age 15 I started trying to develope a DirectX equivalent and oooooooohhhh was I disapointed to support all those cards and the little bugs and tricks with each card is not something any one person can do.

Good luck
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why is evryone so worried about learning DirectX...It is a piece of junk. It alot wiser to learn OpenGL for the simple fact that it is a lot more widely used in games today..not to mention looks a heck of alot nicer... Even John Carmack says it is just not worth wasting his time with... plus if you learn GL then you have something under your belt that is a heck of lot more powerful then the DirectX that you want to learn

--------------
Radiohead
--------------

"For God''s Sake Put Some Pants On!"
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to turn this into a DX vs OGL argument. The reason we keep talk about learning Direct X is because it encompases EVERYTHING.

OpenGL doesn''t take into account Sound, Joysticks, Keyboard Input, Mouse Input, Music, Etc. Also OpenGL hasn''t been officialy updated in a long time while DirectX has a new version offering new options every 6 months.

As far as what Carmack says...It was years ago he made a statement saying why he chose OGL over DirectX. And not once did he say DirectX sucks. He said something to the effect that OGL was easier to learn. Now that he knows OpenGL, it''s pretty pointless to spend his time learning the in''s and outs of Direct3d. If you notice though, Quake 2 and 3 both need the DirectX API installed on your machine for it to work correctly. That''s because Quake 2 and 3 use Direct Input which is part of the DirectX foundation SDK.

You can go on making un-researched comments and keep giving your opinion but that doesn''t make OPENGL or DIRECTX better. Both API''s have advantages and disadvantages, but at least when you say something give a reason other than "it''s a peice of junk". To me that statement just means "I can''t figure Direct X out".
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, just to be accurate, Carmack didn''t say DirectX sucked, but he did say, and I quote, "D3D sucks!". It was a long time ago, and obviously you can''t apply that statement today, because it has gotten much better. They are both pretty equivalent today.

Why does everyone say supporting VESA is a headache because of different cards?? The whole point of VESA is to write one standard interface, and it''ll work on any VESA compatable card. Granted lots of them weren''t fully VESA compliant, but that''s what Scitech was for. It''s not really worth learning anymore (nice to know, but not very helpful), but it was very nice once.

Rock
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites