Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CtrlAltDel

OpenGL OpenGL vs. DirectX

Recommended Posts

firstly, find the nearest window, open it, and fling yourself through it.
or if you prefer to be dramatic, leave the window closed.
please SEARCH the freaking forums before asking this TIRED question AGAIN.
almost every single time this topic comes up it turnes into a freaking lame ass debate.


-eldee
;another space monkey;
[ Forced Evolution Studios ]


Vash says: eat more donuts, play more games!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by eldee
firstly, find the nearest window, open it, and fling yourself through it.
or if you prefer to be dramatic, leave the window closed.
please SEARCH the freaking forums before asking this TIRED question AGAIN.



I''d say go for the flinging yourself through the window (closed) option.

Make a random number generator. If you get an even, learn DirectX. Odd, OpenGL.

Its as simple as that. If you can''t make a random number generator, you''re not ready for an API.

------------------------------
Simple DirectMedia Layer:

Main Site - (www.libsdl.org)
Cone3D Tutorials- (cone3D.gamedev.net)
GameDev.net''s Tutorials - (Here)

OpenGL:

Main Site - (www.opengl.org)
NeHe Tutorials - (nehe.gamedev.net)
Online Books - (Red Book) (Blue Book)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Andrew Nguyen
Better, yet, jump throught the glass instead. Or mabye we can go over to your house and rip your body to shreds.

I think that was implied by the "window closed" option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really though, in a couple of days there''s going to be a good article about it. When it comes out, you can decide.

------------------------------
Simple DirectMedia Layer:

Main Site - (www.libsdl.org)
Cone3D Tutorials- (cone3D.gamedev.net)
GameDev.net''s Tutorials - (Here)

OpenGL:

Main Site - (www.opengl.org)
NeHe Tutorials - (nehe.gamedev.net)
Online Books - (Red Book) (Blue Book)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by CtrlAltDel
Actaully I did, My main point was which one is easier to learn, and I didn''t see that in any of the previous discussions.


OpenGL is easier : no COM stuff and several wrapper libraries (e.g. GLUT) to take care of the windowing for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a few of the previous debates on this topic. Maybe this will answer your question.

http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=70736
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=51612
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=41610
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=33732
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=23313
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=16371
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=14358
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=18187
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=69298
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=68555
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=68362
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=67101
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=66775
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=65166
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=62875
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=62373
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=61258
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=59551
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=55468
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=50671
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=49972
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=48101
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=47986
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=47679
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=46038
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=45782
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=44371
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=44131
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=42463
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=41580

Anyway I didnt make it 1/3 the way down the search result page and this is what I found. If you are not sure how to use search I am sure someone will explain it. By the way I searched all forums and used the keywords "direcx opengl" and I only pulled the topics with the same name as yours. Good luck

GRELLIN
Don''t sit and complain about a program, make a better one or shut up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627759
    • Total Posts
      2978958
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now